Advertisement

Advantages and Disadvantages of Traditional Atlantoaxial Fusion Techniques

  • Xuhua Lu
  • Tianming Xu
Chapter
Part of the Translational Medicine Research book series (TRAMERE)

Abstract

For C1–C2 instability, the primary goal of treatment is to reconstruct the normal C1–C2 alignment and achieve solid bone fusion, avoiding deterioration of the neurological function. Conservative management is associated with significant segmental movement at C1–C2 but results in relatively low fusion rates when used alone. Therefore, surgical treatment with internal fixation is generally used to promote higher fusion rates. Anterior and posterior techniques for stabilization of the C1–C2 segments have been developed during the last several decades. C1–C2 fixations from the posterior approach are the mainstays of surgical treatment for atlantoaxial instability. This chapter describes the traditional posterior atlantoaxial fusion techniques and their advantages and disadvantages.

References

  1. 1.
    Mixter SJ, Osgood RB IV. Traumatic lesions of the atlas and axis. Ann Surg. 1910;51:193–207.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gallie W. Fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. Am J Surg. 1939;46:495–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brooks AL, Jenkins EB. Atlanto-axial arthrodesis by the wedge compression method. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:279–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dickman CA, Sonntag VK, Papadopoulos SM, et al. The interspinous method of posterior atlantoaxial arthrodesis. J Neurosurg. 1991;74:190–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Griswold DM, Albright JA, Schiffman E, et al. Atlanto-axial fusion for instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:285–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tucker HH. Technical report: method of fixation of subluxed or dislocated cervical spine below C1–C2. Can J Neurol Sci. 1975;2:381–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Magerl F, Seeman PS. Stable posterior fusion of the atlas by transarticular screw fixation. In: Kehr P, Weidner A, editors. Cervical spine I. New York: Springer; 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paramore CG, Dickman CA, Sonntag VK. The anatomical suitability of the C1–2 complex for transarticular screw fixation. J Neurosurg. 1996;85:221–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goel A, Laheri V. Plate and screw fixation for atlanto-axial subluxation. Acta Neurochir. 1994;129:47–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harms J, Melcher RP. Posterior C1–C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine. 2001;26:2467–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wright NM. Posterior C2 fixation using bilateral, crossing C2 laminar screws: case series and technical note. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17:158–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dickman CA, Crawford NR, Paramore CG. Biomechanical characteristics of C1–2 cable fixations. J Neurosurg. 1996;85:316–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Naderi S, Crawford NR, Song GS, et al. Biomechanical comparison of C1–C2 posterior fixations. Cable, graft, and screw combinations. Spine. 1998;23:1946–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Melcher RP, Puttlitz CM, Kleinstueck FS, et al. Biomechanical testing of posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques. Spine. 2002;27:2435–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Richter M, Schmidt R, Claes L, et al. Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: biomechanical in vitro comparison of six different techniques. Spine. 2002;27:1724–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gorek J, Acaroglu E, Berven S, et al. Constructs incorporating intralaminar C2 screws provide rigid stability for atlantoaxial fixation. Spine. 2005;30:1513–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sim HB, Lee JW, Park JT, et al. Biomechanical evaluations of various C1–C2 posterior fixation techniques. Spine. 2011;36:E401–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wright NM, Lauryssen C. Vertebral artery injury in C1–2 transarticular screw fixation: results of a survey of the AANS/CNS section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves. American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons. J Neurosurg. 1998;88:634–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xuhua Lu
    • 1
  • Tianming Xu
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of OrthopedicsChangzheng HospitalShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of OrthopedicsNo. 455 Hospital of PLAShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations