Advertisement

The Way Forward—Moving Toward Net Zero Energy Standards

  • Adisa Adejare Alawode
  • Priyadarsini Rajagopalan
Chapter
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

Net zero energy building standards have been gaining prominence lately as the next performance target for buildings. However, despite the demonstrated benefits of such building performance across triple bottom-line concepts, Australia is yet to formulate a policy toward adopting a net zero energy building standard. Evidence from various scholars suggests that Australia cannot delay the implementation of deep improvements in energy efficiency in the built environment any longer, as issues of energy security, affordability and increasing greenhouse gas emissions have become critical. This chapter reviews recent advances in the high-performance building standards with emphasis on global developments of net zero energy standards and discusses how Australia is positioned in relation to this standard and the ways Australia might move forward to this standard.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdellah RH, Nasid MA, Chen GK, Mohamed S, Omar R (2017) The potential of net zero energy buildings (nzebs) concept at the design stage of healthcare buildings towards sustainable development. IOP Conference series: Materials Science and Engineering, p 271Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adhikari RS, Aste N, Pero CD, Manfren M (2012) Net zero energy buildings: expense or investment? Energy Procedia 14:1331–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aelenei L, Aelenei D, Cubi E, Musall E, Tae Kim J, Shaan C, Donn M (2017) Net zero energy building design fundamentals. In: Garde F, Ayoub J, Aelenei L, Aelenei D, Scognamiglio A (eds) Solution sets for net zero energy buildings: feedback from 30 net zebs worldwide. Ernst & Sohn, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aelenei L, Aelenei D, Gonçalves H, Lollini R, Musall E, Scognamiglio A, Cubi E, Noguchi M (2013) Design issues for net zero-energy buildings. Open House Int 38:7–14Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Agostino D, Zangheri P, Castellazzi L (2017) Towards nearly zero energy buildings in europe: a focus on retrofit in non-residential buildings. Energies 10:117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aksamija A (2016) Regenerative design and adaptive reuse of existing commercial buildings for net-zero energy use. Sustain Cities Soc 27:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Asbec (2007) Capitalising on the building sector’s potential to lessen the costs of a broad based ghg emissions cut. In: Sydney, C. F. I. E. C. (ed.). ASBEC, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berry S, Davidson K, Saman W (2014) Defining zero carbon and zero energy homes from a performance-based regulatory perspective. Energ Effi 7:303–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berry S, Marker T (2015) Residential energy efficiency standards in australia: where to next? Energ Effi 8:963–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    California Energy Commission (2013) 2013 integrated energy policy report. California Energy Commission, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cellura M, Campanella L, Ciulla G, Guarino F, Brano VL, Cesarini DN, Orioli A (2011) A net zero energy building in Italy: design studies to reach the net zero energy target. In: Proceedings of building simulation, pp 649–655Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Challenge (2017) Us building sector emissions down- the driving force: You! In: 2030, A. (ed)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Da Graça GC, Augusto A, Lerer MM (2012) Solar powered net zero energy houses for southern europe: feasibility study. Sol Energy 86:634–646Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    European Commission (2012) Towards nearly zero energy buildings: definitions of common principles under the epbd-final report. In: Ecofys (ed). European Commission, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    FXFOWLE Architects, Dagher Engineering, Passive House academy, Dharam Consulting, Simpson Gumpertz Heger (2017) Feasibility study to implement the passivhaus standard on tall residential buildings. New York State Research and Development AuthorityGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Garde F, Lenoir A, Scognamiglio A, Aelenei D, Waldren D, Rostvik HN, Ayoub J, Aelenei L, Donn M, Tardif M, Cory S (2014) Design of net zero energy buildings: feedback from international projects. In: The 6th International conference on Applied Energy—ICAE2014. Energy ProcediaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gettler L (2014) Net zero energy buildings: why Australia must get a move on. The Fifth Estate [Online]. Available: http://www.thefifthestate.com.au/innovation/design/net-zero-buildings-why-australia-must-get-a-move-on/58346. Accessed 28 Feb 2017
  18. 18.
    Heechan K (2010) Korean green building code. SERI Q 3(105–111):8Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hootman T (2013) Integrated process. In: Net zero energy design: a guide for commercial architecture. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Horne R, Hayles C, Hes D, Jensen C, Opray L, Wakefield R, Wasiluk K (2005) International comparison of building energy performance standards. Report to Australian Greenhouse Office, Department of Environment and HeritageGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Iea Shc Task 40 (2015) Towards net zero energy solar buildings-shc position paper. In: 52, E. A. (ed). International Energy Agency Solar Heating & Cooling ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jewell C (2016) We can get net zero high-rise resi-with the right support. The Fifth Estate. https://www.thefifthestate.com.au/innovation/building-construction/we-can-get-net-zero-high-rise-resi-with-the-right-support. Last Accessed 18 Jan 2018
  23. 23.
    Keeler M (2016) Net zero energy and renewable energy systems. In: Vaidya P (ed) Fundamentals of integrated design for sustainable building, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kibert CJ, Fard MM (2012) Differentiating among low-energy, low-carbon and net-zero-energy building strategies for policy formulation. Build Res Inf 40:625–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kurnitski J (2013) Nearly zero-energy building’s (nzeb) definitions and assessment boundaries. In: Kurnitski J (ed) Cost optimal and nearly zero-energy buildings (nzeb): definitions, calculation principles and case studies. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kwan Y, Guan L (2015) Design a zero energy house in Brisbane, Australia. In: 9th International Symposium on Heating, Ventilation and Air conditioning (ISHVAC) and the 3rd International Conference on Building Energy and Environment (COBEE), 2015. Elsevier Science Direct, pp 604–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kylili A, Fokaides PA (2015) European smart cities: the role of zero energy buildings. Sustain Cities Soc 15:86–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li DH, Yang L, Lam JC (2013) Zero energy buildings and sustainable development implications—a review. Energy 54:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marszal AJ, Heiselberg P (2011) Life cycle cost analysis of a multi-storey residential net zero energy building in denmark. Energy 36:5600–5609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mccrea A (2013) Renewable energy. Ramsbury, Marlborough, Wiltshire SN8 2HR, The Cromwood Press LtdGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Melbourne Energy Institute (2013) Zero carbon Australia buildings plan. Kindness House, Suite 10 Level 1, 288 Brunswich Street, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Beyond Zero EmissionsGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry (2015) Meti compiles zeh roadmap. In: Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry (ed). Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moore T (2014) Modelling the through-life costs and benefits of detached zero (net) energy housing in Melbourne, Australia. Energy Build 70:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nicholas RB, William MC, Roland RJ (2013) The prospect of zero net energy buildings in the United States. In: Sioshansi FP (ed) Energy efficiency: towards the end of demand growth. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Passive House Institute 2018Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pitt&Sherry (2016) Accelerating net-zero high-rise residential buildings in Australia-final report. City of SydneyGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Powerhouse (2013) Nearly zero energy buildings overview: status, cost optimality and key conditions for nzeb. POWER HOUSE nearly Zero Energy Challenge ReportGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rodriguez-Ubinas E, Montero C, Porteros M, Vega S, Navarro I, Castillo-Cagigal M, Matallanas E, Gutiérrez A (2014) Passive design strategies and performance of net energy plus houses. Energy Build 83:10–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sartori I, Napolitano A, Voss K (2011) Net zero energy buildings: a consistent definition framework. Energy & Buildings 48:220–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schimschar S, Blok K, Boermans T, Hermelink A (2011) Germany’s path towards nearly zero-energy buildings—enabling the greenhouse gas mitigation potential in the building stock. Energy Policy 39:3346–4215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sissine F (2007) Crs report for congress—energy independence and security act of 2007: a summary of major provisions. In: Service, C. R. (ed). CRS, Energy Policy Resources Science and Industry divisionGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Torcellini P, Pless S, Deru M, Crawley D (2006) Zero energy buildings: a critical look at the definition. National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Department of Energy, USGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wang L, Gwilliam J, Jones P (2009) Case study of zero energy house design in UK. Energy Build 41:1215–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wells L, Rismanchi B, Aye L (2017) A review of net zero energy buildings with reflections on the Australian context. Energy BuildGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adisa Adejare Alawode
    • 1
  • Priyadarsini Rajagopalan
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Property Construction and Project ManagementRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Sustainable Building Innovation Laboratory, School of Property Construction and Project ManagementRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations