Adaptive MAC Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks for Disaster Detection

  • Anshu Katiyar
  • Jitendra Kumar
  • Pabitra Mohan Khilar
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 710)

Abstract

The real-time applications of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) make it as a vast area of emerging research. An energy efficient and reliable medium access control (MAC) protocol plays an important role to monitor a natural disaster such as volcano eruptions. Area of interest is to handle the emergency situation when the vibrations from earth surpass a threshold value, reliable and immediate delivery of data is required. To fulfill these dynamic scenarios, Adaptive MAC protocol (A-MAC) is used to give QoS services in normal as well as emergency situations. A-MAC protocol uses the standard IEEE 802.15.4 protocol in normal traffic, while in emergency traffic it uses IEEE 802.15.4 protocol with different backoff mechanism. In the emergency traffic, this mechanism is able to give better results as compared to standard mechanism.

Keywords

IEEE 802.15.4 Adaptive MAC Variable traffic Disaster detection Energy consumption 

References

  1. 1.
    M. A. Hanson, H. C. Powell Jr, A. T. Barth, K. Ringgenberg, B. H. Calhoun, J. H. Aylor, and J. Lach, “Body area sensor networks: Challenges and opportunities,” Computer, vol. 42, no. 1, 2009.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. R. Mendez, M. A. M. Yunus, and S. C. Mukhopadhyay, “A wifi based smart wireless sensor network for an agricultural environment,” in 2011 Fifth International Conference on Sensing Technology, Nov 2011, pp. 405–410.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. D. P. Fei, “Energy-efficient mac protocols for wireless sensor networks,” information and communications technologies, Beihang University, Beijing, vol. 100083, 2009.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Nadeem, M. A. Hussain, O. Owais, A. Salam, S. Iqbal, and K. Ahsan, “Application specific study, analysis and classification of body area wireless sensor network applications,” Computer Networks, vol. 83, pp. 363–380, 2015.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Koubâa, M. Alves, and E. Tovar, “IEEE 802.15.4: a federating communication protocol for time-sensitive wireless sensor networks,” Sensor Networks and Configurations: Fundamentals, Techniques, Platforms, and Experiments, pp. 19–49, 2006.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Koubaa, M. Alves, B. Nefzi, and Y.-Q. Song, “Improving the IEEE 802.15. 4 slotted CSMA/CA MAC for time-critical events in wireless sensor networks,” 2006.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Du, D. Navarro, and F. Mieyeville, “Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.15. 4 sensor networks in industrial applications,” International Journal of Communication Systems, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1657–1674, 2015.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Samal, M. Dash, R. R. Swain, and M. R. Kabat, “A media access control protocol for healthcare sensor networks,” in Next Generation Computing Technologies (NGCT), 2015 1st International Conference on. IEEE, 2015, pp. 331–337.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.-G. Ko, Y.-H. Cho, and H. Kim, “Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4 MAC with different backoff ranges in wireless sensor networks,” in Communication systems, 2006. ICCS 2006. 10th IEEE Singapore International Conference on. IEEE, 2006, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. V. Patil and A. Y. Kazi, “Performance analysis of IEEE 802.15.4 sensor networks,” in 2013 Fourth International Conference on Computing, Communications and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), July 2013, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anshu Katiyar
    • 1
  • Jitendra Kumar
    • 1
  • Pabitra Mohan Khilar
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of TechnologyRourkelaIndia

Personalised recommendations