Research on Hierarchical Aggregation Method for Situation Assessment

  • Xiaoxuan WangEmail author
  • Zhenyi Zhao
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 474)


The issue of the target aggregation is an important function which the situation assessment needed to implement. Because of such a variety of targets, complicated coordinated relationships and fast evolved battlefield situation in joint command and control, it is difficult for commanders to make effective decisions confronted with excessive information. In this paper, an analysis of target aggregation in situation understanding is made, and a mathematic model of the armored targets on the battlefield is built. On this basis, a hierarchical aggregation algorithm is proposed, and the information of operational units is classified in order to form the hypothesis of the military systematic units at relationship level, and to reveal the relationship between situation elements and functions of situation elements. Finally, the feasibility of the algorithm is verified through a situation example, thus laying the foundation for the intention of the target behavior judgment and the enemy combat attempt.


Situation assessment Target grouping Hierarchical aggregation 


  1. 1.
    Liggins, M.E., Hall, D.L., Llinas, J.: Handbook of Multisensor Data Fusion: Theory and Practice, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, London, New York (2008). Foundation of situation and thread assessment, chap. 18 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyacioglu, M.A., Kara, Y., Baykan, O.K.: Predicting bank financial failures using neural networks, support vector machines and multivariate statistical methods: a comparative analysis in the sample of Savings Deposit Insurance Fund (SDIF) Transferred Banks in Turkey. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(2), 3355–3366 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yuan, D., Zheng, J.: Target grouping algorithm based on multiple combat formations. Comput. Sci. 43(2), 235–244 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jain, A.K., Murty, M.N., Flynn, P.J.: Data clustering: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 31, 264–323 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, Y., Lao, S., Liu, G., et al.: Maximum entropy object grouping algorithm based on dissipative structure theory. Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 32(12), 2816–2824 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang, D., Ai, W.: Design and realization of target grouping in situation assessment. Radio Eng. 46(11), 42–46 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, T., Jin, X., Yan, J.: Method for situation calculation service choreography on operational mission requirement. Command Inf. Syst. Technol. 7(5), 25–29 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahuja, S., Waslander, S.L.: Scan registration using region-growing clustering NDT. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, vol. 1, pp. 1–11 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li, Y., Liu, L., Long, T., Dong, W.: Metamodel-based global optimization using fuzzy clustering for design space reduction. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 26(5), 928–939 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bing, F., Cuixia, Z.: Battlefield situation prediction method based on spatial-time dimension analysis. Command Inf. Syst. Technol. 8(1), 59–63 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Science and Technology on Information System Engineering LaboratoryNanjing Research Institute of Electronics EngineeringNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations