Advertisement

The Horizontal Extended Velocity Model of Steam Chamber Front in Dual-Well SAGD Process

  • Shouya Wu
  • Zhaomin Li
  • Teng Lu
  • Shangqi Liu
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering book series (SSGG)

Abstract

The dual-well steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) process could effectively enhance the oil recovery, and the heat transfer on stream chamber front plays the key role on SAGD process efficiency. The expanding velocity of steam chamber front directly characterizes heat transfer efficiency, which is also important index to evaluate SAGD process and to identify effectively development scheme. The existing theoretical model simplifies expansion process as flat propulsion, while the angle could change during the actual process. In this paper, it was assumed that the extension of steam chamber has two patterns: plate expansion process and sector expansion process. The horizontal extended velocity model of plate expansion process and the angular velocity model of sector expansion process were built based on derivation of the heat-transfer mechanism model. These two different velocities could be calculated with the actual data coming from an SAGD process in Xinjiang Oilfield, and the comparable results suggested that the angle change could not be ignored as the difference between these two velocities could be up to 15%.

Keywords

SAGD Dual horizontal wells Stream chamber front Horizontal extended velocity model Heat-transfer mechanism model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial support of the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2016ZX05012002-004).

References

  1. 1.
    Butler RM (1991) Thermal recovery of oil and bitumenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhu L, Zeng F, Huang Y (2015) A correlation of steam chamber size and temperature falloff in the early-period of the SAGD process. Fuel 148:168–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al-Bahlani AM, Babadagli T (2009) SAGD laboratory experimental and numerical simulation studies: a review of current status and future issues. J Petrol Sci Eng 68(3–4):135–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ali SMF (1997) Is there life after SAGD? J Can Pet Technol 36(6):20–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ito Y, Suzuki S (1996) Numerical simulation of the SAGD process in the hanging stone oil sands reservoir. J Can Pet Technol 38(9):27–35Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ito Y, Ipek G (2005) Steam Fingering phenomenon during SAGD process. In: Paper SPE 97729 Presented at the SPE/PS-CIM/CHOA international thermal operations and heavy oil symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 1–3 Nov 2005Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharma J, Gates ID (2011) Convection at the Edge of a steam-assisted-gravity-drainage steam chamber. SPE J 16(3):503–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Irani M, Ghannadi S (2013) Understanding the heat-transfer mechanism in the steam-assisted gravity-drainage (SAGD) process and comparing the conduction and convection flux in bitumen reservoirs. SPE J 18(1):134–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Irani M, Gates ID (2013) Understanding the convection heat-transfer mechanism in steam-assisted-gravity-drainage process. SPE J 18(6):1202–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu M (2015) Temperature distribution ahead of the steam chamber in SAGD. Sci Technol Eng 15(3):71–74Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Petroleum EngineeringChina University of PetroleumBeijingChina
  2. 2.PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and DevelopmentBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations