Advertisement

Sensitivity Analysis of Near-Wellbore Fracture Curving in Horizontal Well

  • Zhiyu Sun
  • Liyang Song
  • Changyin Liu
  • Zhiwen Huang
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering book series (SSGG)

Abstract

A three-dimensional (3D) model is presented for initiation and propagation of hydraulic fracture in near-wellbore region of horizontal well, investigating the sensitivity of fracture curving to relevant mechanical and reservoir properties, far-field stress conditions, operating data and azimuth angle of horizontal wellbore. The new model is based on a fully coupled pressure/deformation extended finite element method (XFEM) capable of activating arbitrarily oriented discontinuities in both displacements and pore pressure, considering the flow of the fracturing fluid that enters and leaks through the fracture surfaces, the flow of the pore fluid within the pores, the rock deformation, and the fracture evolution. Also, the corresponding governing equations for each of the coupled processes, details of 3D model setup, and assumptions involved in near-wellbore hydraulic fracture curving within Abaqus are provided in this paper. Compared to other analytical or 2D numerical solutions, this methodology described here provides a way to quantify the magnitude of fracture radius of curvature and width variation along the turning fracture correlated to controlling parameters. Our results demonstrate that fracture initiates from non-ideal orientation may extends outwards and turns toward its preferred direction relative to the far-field stress as previously published experimental results. It is shown that both maximum horizontal in situ stress contrast and leakoff coefficient of fracture surfaces are negatively correlated to the radius of fracture curvature that as either of them increases, the radius of curvature will decrease. On the contrary, Young’s modulus, fluid viscosity, injection rate, and azimuth angle of horizontal wellbore are positively correlated to the radius of fracture curvature. Among these key parameters, the maximum horizontal in situ stress contrast plays the most important role and compared to viscous fluid, fracture curving is more sensitive to injection rate. The sensitivity of fracture curving radius to various properties obtained in this numerical procedure would allow operators to optimize the treatment design for proper fracture tortuosity remedy in the near-wellbore region of horizontal well in tight oil and gas reservoirs.

Keywords

Sensitivity Near-wellbore Fracture tortuosity Fracture curvature Horizontal well 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development.

References

  1. 1.
    El Rabaa W (1989) Experimental study of hydraulic fracture geometry initiated from horizontal wells. In: Proceedings of the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, San Antonio, paper SPE 19720, 8–11 Oct 1989Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weng X (1993) Fracture initiation and propagation from deviated wellbores. In: Proceedings of the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Houston, 306, paper SPE 26597, Oct 1993Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aud WW, Wright TB, Cipolla CL, Harkrider JD, Hansen JT (1994) The effect of viscosity on near-wellbore tortuosity and premature screenouts. In: Proceedings of the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, New Orleans, paper SPE 28492, 25–28 Sept 1994Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Soliman MY, East L, Adams D (2008) Geomechanics aspects of multiple fracturing of horizontal and vertical wells. SPE Drill Complet 23:217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hallam SD, Last NC (1990) Geometry of hydraulic fractures from modestly deviated wellbores. J Pet Technol 43:742–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang X, Jeffrey RG, Bunger AP, Thiercelin M (2011) Initiation and growth of a hydraulic fracture from a circular wellbore. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 48(6):984–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang G-Q, Chen M (2005) Non planar propagation of hydraulic fracture near horizontal wellbore. Acta Pet Sinica 26(3):95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lecampion B, Abbas S, Prioul R (2013) Competition between transverse and axial hydraulic fractures in horizontal wells. In: Proceedings of SPE hydraulic fracturing technology conference, Woodlands, 4–6 Feb 2013Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sherman CS, Aarons LR, Morris JP, Johnson, Savitski AA, Geilikman MB (2015) Finite element modelling of curving hydraulic fractures and near-wellbore hydraulic fracture complexity. In Proceedings of the 49th US rock mechanics symposium/geomechanics symposium, San Francisco, 28 June–1 July 2015Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stanchits S, Surdi A, Gathogo P, Edelman E, Suarez-Rivera R (2014) Onset of hydraulic fracture initiation monitored by acoustic emission and volumetric deformation measurements. Rock Mech Rock Eng 4(5):1521–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gordeliy E, Detournay E, Napier JAL (2010) Modeling of near-surface bowl-shaped fractures. In: Proceedings of the 44th U.S. rock mechanics symposium and 5th U.S.-Canada rock mechanics symposium, Salt Lake City, 27–30 June 2010Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bunger AP, Gordeliy E, Detournay E (2013) Comparison between laboratory experiment sand coupled simulations of saucer-shaped hydraulic fractures in homogeneous brittle-elastic solids. J Mech Phys Solids 61(7):1636–1654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abaqus User’s Manual (2014) Version 6.14, Dassault Systemes Corp., Providence, RIGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Charlez PA (1997) Rock Mechanics, vol 2. Editions Technip, Petroleum ApplicationsGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (1999) Finite-Deformation Irreversible Cohesive Elements For Three-Dimensional Crack-Propagation Analysis. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng. 44:1267–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bunger AP, Detournay E (2008) Experimental validation of the tip asymptotics for a fluid-driven crack. J Mech Phys Solids 11:3101–3115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hu J, Garagash DL (2010) Plane-Strain propagation of a fluid-driven crack in a permeable rock with fracture toughness. J Eng Mech 136(9):1152–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peirce A, Detournay E (2008) An implicit level set method for modeling hydraulically driven fractures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:2858–2885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Garagash DL, Dctournay E, Adachi JI (2011) Multiscale tip asymptotics in hydraulic fracture with Leak-off. J Fluid Mech 669:260–297MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhiyu Sun
    • 1
  • Liyang Song
    • 1
  • Changyin Liu
    • 1
  • Zhiwen Huang
    • 1
  1. 1.Petroleum Exploration and Production Research InstituteBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations