Advertisement

Impact of Interlayer Distribution on SAGD Performance and Countermeasures in Oil Sands Project

  • Guangyue Liang
  • Shangqi Liu
  • Yu Bao
  • Yanyan Luo
  • Yang Liu
  • Bin Han
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering book series (SSGG)

Abstract

The interlayer tends to reduce vertical permeability of reservoir and interfere with steam and heated oil flow. This issue becomes the key factor impacting SAGD performance of oil sands. The core data of Mackay River oil sands demonstrates that interlayers are distributed with different thickness, extended range, and distribution frequency in the reservoir; the impact of these properties on SAGD performance and steam chamber growth as well as countermeasures remains to be further studied. Four types of SAGD well pairs were divided according to the location and distribution frequency of interlayers. Based on two-dimensional (2D) physical and three-dimensional (3D) numerical simulation, the effect of interlayer location on SAGD performance and steam chamber growth was discussed. On this basis, the feasibility of combining single-well SAGD (SW-SAGD) technology with dual horizontal SAGD wells for type C was evaluated by 2D physical simulation. In addition, the strategy of well pair placement, SAGD well pair with dual-tubing strings, and smart well technology combined with intelligent steam injection strategy was discussed with 3D numerical simulation.

Keywords

Oil sands Interlayer SAGD Steam chamber 

Nomenclature

CSOR

Cumulative steam–oil ratio

SAGD

Steam assisted gravity drainage

KP

Proportional coefficient, kPa/K

KI

Integral coefficient, kPa/(K d)

KD

Derivative coefficient, kPa d/K

Pi+1

Steam injection pressure at (i + 1)th adjustment period, kPa

Pi

Steam injection pressure at ith adjustment period, kPa

ε(t)

The error between injection–production temperature difference and targeted subcool at time t, K

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank RIPED, CNPC for allowing this paper published in the WHOC.

References

  1. 1.
    Chen Q, Gerritsen MG, Kovscek AR (2007) Effects of reservoir heterogeneities on the steam-assisted gravity drainage process. In: SPE 109873, presented at the 2007 SPE annual technical conference and exhibition held in Anaheim, California, U.S.A., 11–14 Nov 2007Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ipek G, Frauenfeld T, Yuan JY (2008) Numerical Study of Shale Issues in SAGD. In: Paper 2008-150, presented for the petroleum society’s 59th annual technical meeting, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 17–19 June 2008Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Le Ravalec M, Morlot C, Marmier R, Foulon D (2009) Heterogeneity impact on SAGD process performance in mobile heavy oil reservoirs. Oil Gas Sci Technol 64:469–476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shin H, Choe J (2009) Shale barrier effects on the SAGD performance. In: SPE 125211, presented at the SPE/EAGE reservoir characterization and simulation conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 19–21 Oct 2009Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang GH, Butler RM (1992) Effects of reservoir heterogeneities on heavy oil recovery by steam-assisted gravity drianage. J Can Petr Technol 31(8):37–43Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guangyue Liang
    • 1
  • Shangqi Liu
    • 1
  • Yu Bao
    • 1
  • Yanyan Luo
    • 1
  • Yang Liu
    • 1
  • Bin Han
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development (RIPED), PetroChinaBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations