Advertisement

Pump Tax, Basin Equity Assessment and Sustainability in Groundwater Management: Orange County Water District Experience

Chapter
Part of the Global Environmental Studies book series (GENVST)

Abstract

The term “sustainable development” has become very popular among researchers, practitioners and policymakers since the 1980s. The sustainability concept is now applied in the field of groundwater management. Excessive groundwater pumping is taking place in many parts of the world and the means to achieve sustainable groundwater management has become an urgent need. The purpose of this paper is to analyze how to promote sustainable groundwater management, with a focus on Orange County Water District (OCWD), California, USA. OCWD faced excessive groundwater pumping in the 1920s. Since then, the district introduced various policies including a pump tax and basin equity assessment to tackle the problem, and continues to use groundwater as the primary supply. Investigation into the factors that enable OCWD to use groundwater continuously provides useful information to policymakers in other areas who are engaged in groundwater management. In addition, policy implications in terms of sustainability are drawn from OCWD’s groundwater management.

Keywords

Common-pool resources Groundwater management Sustainable development Sustainability Pump tax Basin equity assessment Orange County Water District California 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the research project “Human-environmental security in the Asia-pacific ring of fire” (Director Aiko Endo, Associate Professor, Research Institute for Humanity and Nature) under the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature Project and “Fusion of global water resources assessment and social institution studies” (Director Shinjiro Kanae, Professor, Tokyo Institute of Technology), under the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)) grant number 15H04047. Special thanks are due to Mr. Roy L. Herndon, OCWD chief hydro-geologist, for providing the data. The views presented here are those of the author and should be in no way attributed to organization mentioned above. Last, I thank the reviewers for their useful comments. Responsibility for the text rests entirely with the author. We thank Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

References

  1. Barbier EB (1990) Alternative approaches to economic-environmental interactions. Ecol Econ 2:7–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blomquist W (1992) Dividing the waters, governing groundwater in southern California. ICS Press, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  3. Blomquist W, Schlager E, Heikkila T (2004) Common waters, diverging streams: linking institutions and water management in Arizona, California and Colorado. Resources for the Future, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Braadbaart O, Braadbaart F (1997) Policing the urban pumping race: industrial groundwater overexploitation in Indonesia. World Dev 25(2):199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruun E, Givoni M (2015) Six research routes to steer transport policy. Nature 523:29–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. California Department of Water Resources (1959) Santa Ana River investigation (bulletin No.15), SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  7. Crooke HW (1954) Orange County inaugurates first tax for pumping water from underground basin. Western City Magazine, issue of OctoberGoogle Scholar
  8. Crooke HW (1961) Ground water replenishment in Orange County, California. J Am Water Works Assoc 53(7):831–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crooke HW (1963) Financing a ground water replenishment program and ground water basin management in the area of Orange County Water District. In: proceedings, biennial conference on ground water recharge and ground water management, University of California, Berkeley, California, 26–27 June 1963Google Scholar
  10. Daily HE (1995) On Wilfred Beckerman’s critique of sustainable development. Environ Values 4:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dales JH (1968) Land, water and ownership. Can J Econ 1:791–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Lambert DA (1984) District management for California’s groundwater. Ecol Law Quart 11:373–400Google Scholar
  13. Eisler MC, Lee MRF (2014) Steps to sustainable livestock. Nature 507:32–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Endo T (2015) Groundwater management: a search for better policy combinations. Water Policy 17:332–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farmer MC, Randall A (1998) The rationality of a safe minimum standard. Land Econ 74(3):287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Governor’s Commission to Review California Water Rights Law (1978) Final report. SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  17. Green TR, Taniguchi M, Kooi H et al (2011) Beneath the surface of global change: impacts of climate change on groundwater. J Hydrol 405:532–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hardin G (1968) Tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heal G, Schlenker W (2008) Sustainable fisheries. Nature 455:1044–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Herndon RL (2013) Personal interview regarding groundwater management in Orange County Water District, Orange County, California, December 9Google Scholar
  21. Lippincott JB (1925) Report on water conservation and flood control on the Santa Ana river for Orange County, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  22. Lipson AJ (1978) Efficient water use in California: the evolution of groundwater management in southern California. Rand Corporation report no. R-2387/2-CSA/RF, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  23. Littleworth AL, Garner EL (1995) California water. Solano Press Books, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  24. Lorphensri O, Ladawadee A, Dhammasarn S (2011) Review of groundwater management and land subsidence in Bangkok, Thailand. In: Taniguchi M (ed) Groundwater and subsurface environments: human impacts in Asian coastal cities. Springer, Tokyo, pp 127–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Orange County Water District (1970) Orange County Water Disrict (Annual report). Orange County Water District, Orange County, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  26. Orange County Water District (2009) Orange County Water District groundwater management plan update 2009. Orange County Water DistrictGoogle Scholar
  27. Orange County Water District (2015) Orange County Water District groundwater management plan update 2015. Orange County Water District. Available via https://www.ocwd.com/media/3622/groundwatermanagementplan2015update_20150624.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2017
  28. Orange County Water District (2017) 2015–2016 Engineer’s report on groundwater conditions, water supply and basin utilization in the Orange County Water District. Available via https://www.ocwd.com/media/5396/2015-2016-engineers-report.pdf. Accessed 13 July 2017
  29. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons, the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ostrom E, Burger J, Field CB et al (1999) Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science 284:278–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pearce D, Atkinson G (1998) Concept of sustainable development: an evaluation of its usefulness 10 years after Brundtland. Environ Econ Policy Stud 1:95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Randall A, Farmer MC (1995) Benefits, costs, and the safe minimum standard of conservation. In: Bromley DW (ed) The handbook of environmental economics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 26–44Google Scholar
  33. Ruff LE (1970) The economic common sense of pollution. Public Interest 19:69–85Google Scholar
  34. Sampson GS, Sanchirico JN, Roheim CA et al (2015) Secure sustainable seafood from developing countries. Science 348:504–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sandino DA (2005) California’s groundwater management since the Governor’s commission review: the consolidation of local control. McGeorge Law Rev 36(2):484–486Google Scholar
  36. Schuerhoff M, Weikard HP, Zetland D (2013) The life and death of the Dutch groundwater tax. Water Policy 12:1064–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Senate Local Government Committee (2010) What’s so special about special districts? A citizen’s guide to special districts in California (fourth edition). Senate Local Government Committee, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  38. Tarlock AD (1985) An overview of the law of groundwater management. Water Resour Res 21(11):1751–1766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. The World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. Wada Y, van Beek LPH, van Kempen CM et al (2010) Global depletion of groundwater resources. Geophys Res Lett 37:L20402.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044571 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weschler L (1968) Water resources management: the Orange County experience. Institute of Governmental Affairs, University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Sustainable System SciencesOsaka Prefecture UniversitySakai CityJapan

Personalised recommendations