Advertisement

Advanced Technologies in a Modern Risk Society: Role of Resilience-Based Approaches and Public Policy

  • Mika ShimizuEmail author
  • Allen L. Clark
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is a complementary chapter to our discussions on resilience-based approaches/public policy in previous chapters by spotlighting advanced technologies in a modern risk society. Technology advancements are one of the characteristics of a modern risk society which may positively or negatively impact lives, social functions, and coexistence with natural environments. To put it succinctly, technology advancements impact human, social, and natural systems and/or their relationships. Particularly with respect to fostering resilient societies, it is critical to examine the relationship of technologies with resilience and public policy (see Chap.  1). This chapter articulates that the benefits of advanced technology to humans, society, and nature depend on how advanced technologies are utilized and incorporated in the policy formation process, and this relationship is critically linked with resilience-based approaches/public policy. The following section examines how advanced technologies are a core dimension of a modern risk society and a causal element of the need for resilience-based public policy. The examination will be grounded in the context of smart cities and artificial intelligence as emergent and transformational advanced technologies. Based on this analysis, the chapter will conclude with resilience-based policy implications for technology advancements in the context of a modern risk society.

References

  1. Beck, U. (2008). World at risk. Polity.Google Scholar
  2. Bellman, R. (1978). Artificial intelligence: Can computers think?. Thomson Course Technology.Google Scholar
  3. Bowser, A., Solan, M., Michellucci, P., & Pauwels, E. (2017). Artificial intelligence: A policy-oriented introduction. Wilson Center. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/wilson_center_policy_brief_artificial_intelligence.pdf. Accessed March 25, 2018.
  4. Japan Rebuilding Initiative. (2012). Fukushima and nuclear disaster independent investigation committee report (in Japanese). https://www.nirs.org/wp-content/uploads/fukushima/naiic_report.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2018.
  5. Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Meier, P. (2015) Virtual aid to Nepal Foreign Affairs 2015 June.Google Scholar
  7. Nye, J. S., & Donahue, J. D. (Eds.). (2000). Governance in a globalizing world. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  8. Osoba, O. A. & Welser W. IV. (2017). The risks of artificial intelligence to security and the future of work. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE237.html. Accessed March 28, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sengupta, U., Doll, C. N. H., Gasparatos, A., et al. (2017). Sustainable smart cities: Applying complexity science to achieve urban sustainability. UNU-IAS Policy Brief No. 12. https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:6393/UNU-IAS-PB-No12-2017.pdf. Accessed 28, 2018.
  10. Shimizu, M. (2013) Resilience in disaster risk management and public policy: A case study of the Tohoku Disaster. Risks, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 3(4): 44–59.Google Scholar
  11. United Nations. (2017). The new urban agenda. http://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-English.pdf. Accessed April 10, 2018.
  12. Viitanen, J., & Kingston, R. (2014). Smart cities and green growth: Outsourcing democratic and environmental resilience to the global technology sector. Environment and Planning A, 46(4), 803–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.East–West CenterHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations