Advertisement

A Modern Risk Society and Resilience-Based Public Policy: Structural Views

  • Mika ShimizuEmail author
  • Allen L. Clark
Chapter

Abstract

Based on the understandings of scopes of resilience and public policy and their inter-relationship presented in Chap.  1, this chapter demonstrates the linkage of a modern risk society concept, resilience and public policy from structural views to articulate resilience-based public policy. Specifically, this chapter reviews how the risk society concept has evolved in recent years and how the characteristics of a modern risk society are linked with our human, social and natural systems. Then, to present a specific picture of the linkage among a modern risk society linked with human, social and natural systems, resilience and public policy, the subsequent section provides a post-disaster policy formation case (tsunami and seawall construction) after the 2011 Tohoku Disaster in Japan (Great East Japan Earthquake). Thus, the chapter draws a basic outline of resilience-based public policy and “model tools” from a structural perspective.

References

  1. Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dale, A., Kocho-Schellenberg, E., & Patton, E. (2011). Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada’s Arctic. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 995–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, U. (2008). World at risk. Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chia, R. (2008). Enhancing entrepreneurial learning through peripheral vision. In R. Harrison & C. Leitch (Eds.), Entrepreneurial learning: Conceptual frameworks and applications (pp. 27–43). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, A. (2013). 21st century paradigm shifts in the governance and management of disasters. Paper presented at Workshop on Governance Capacity and Natural Disasters, East-West Center Hawaii, 26 August 2013.Google Scholar
  5. Donovan, A., & Oppenheimer, C. (2015). Resilient science: The civic epistemology of disaster risk reduction. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 363–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/srex/SREX_Full_Report.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2017.
  7. Johnston, R. (2008). Introduction to foresight for policy- and decision-making retreat on technology foresight for high-level decision makers, Seville, 14–15 October 2008.Google Scholar
  8. Molarius, R., Wessberg, N., Keränen, J., & Murtonen, M. (2018). Foresight in sight: How to improve urban resilience with collaboration among public authorities? In A. Fekete & F. Fiedrich (Eds.), Urban disaster resilience and security (pp. 397–412). Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Shimizu, M. (2015). Collaborative knowledge creation based resilience. Kyoto: Kyoto University Press. (Japanese).Google Scholar
  10. United Nations. (2016). The world’s cities population. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/urbanization/the_worlds_cities_in_2016_data_booklet.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2017.
  11. Wilbanks, T., Romero Lankao, P., Bao, M., Berkhout, F., Sandy Cairn-cross, S., Ceron, J. P., … Zapata-Marti, R. (2007). Industry, settlement and society. In P. Martin, O. Canziani, J. Palutikof, P. van der Linden, & C. Hanson (Eds.), Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 357–390). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.East–West CenterHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations