Benefit Driven Design Process: An Inclusive and Transdisciplinary Approach Towards Enabling More Resilient and Thriving Outcomes
Around the world there is an increasing number of projects that use the design process to co-create outcomes beyond the provision of physical infrastructure. This chapter explores the role of the design process in supporting developments embedded in social-ecological systems (SES). Two case studies are presented as precedents to explore the Benefit Driven Design Process (BDDP). BDDP is a set of activities that recognise and use their ‘regenerative’ and ‘transformational’ capacity to support collective and individual actions towards more inclusive, resilient and beneficial interactions between the systems that converge in a project. The enabling activities identified in the case studies are then applied and adapted to a project in Nepal. The chapter concludes by discussing the potential of applying BDDPs towards the development of eco-cities.
KeywordsDesign process Mediators Social-ecological system Regenerative development Participation
- Awan, Nishat, Tatjana Schneider, and Jeremy Till. 2011. Spatial Agency: Other Ways of Doing Architecture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Berkes, Fikret, and Carl Folke. 1998. Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- BIAU. 2014. Archivo de La Bienal Iberoamericana de Arquitectura Y Urbanismo [Archive of the Ibero-American Architecture and Urbanism Biennale]. IX -BIAU. http://www.bienalesdearquitectura.es.
- Buchanan, Ash, and Margaret Kern. 2017. The Benefit Mindset: The Psychology of Contribution and Everyday Leadership. International Journal of Wellbeing 7 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar
- Charlesworth, Esther. 2014. Humanitarian Architecture: 15 Stories of Architects Working After Disaster. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- CLEAR. 2016. Lenses Facilitator Manual: How to Create Living Environments in Natural, Social and Economic Systems [Manual]. http://clearabundance.org.
- Colombian Government. 2013. Early Childhood Comprenhensive Care Strategy: Political, Technical and Management Fundamentals “de Cero a Siempre.” Google Scholar
- Downton, Peter. 2013. Design Research Revised. Melbourne: Elizabeth James Productions.Google Scholar
- FONA. 2017. FONA Big Ideas Practical Solutions. Accessed March 8, 2017. https://www.fona.org.au.
- Gill, Tim. 2007. No Fear: Growing up in a Risk Averse Society. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.Google Scholar
- Hes, Dominique, and Chrisna du Plessis. 2015. Designing for Hope. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Impact Design Hub. 2015. The Reality of Building a Social Impact Design Project. https://impactdesignhub.org.
- Our Community Pty Ltd. 2014. The Venny. http://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/aboutmelbourne/projectsandinitiatives/majorprojects/pages/thevenny.aspx.
- Petrescu, Doina. 2005. Losing Control, Keeping Desire. In Architecture and Participation, ed. Peter Blundell-Jones, Doina Petrescu, and Jeremy Till, 43–64. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Schneider, Tatjana, and Jeremy Till. 2009. Beyond Discourse: Notes on Spatial Agency. Footprint: Delft Architecture Theory Journal 4: 97–111.Google Scholar
- Stockholm Resilience Center. 2014. What Is Resilience? An Introduction to Social-Ecological Research. http://www.stockholmresilience.org.
- von der Borch, Danielle. 2011. Memory Needs a Place to Rest. Melbourne Institute for Experimental and Creative Art Therapy.Google Scholar
- Yin, Robert K. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar