Advertisement

Biochar for Effective Cleaning of Contaminated Dumpsite Soil: A Sustainable and Cost-Effective Remediation Technique for Developing Nations

  • Paromita Chakraborty
  • Moitraiyee Mukhopadhyay
  • R. Shruthi
  • Debayan Mazumdar
  • Daniel Snow
  • Jim Jian Wang
Chapter

Abstract

Several studies have reported that open municipal dumpsites in developing countries are acting as a major source for a wide variety of pollutants. In developing nations, many dumpsites are located in the urban centers or even within the residential boundaries. Contaminants released during incomplete combustion of municipal solid waste have profound adverse impact on human health and the environment. Hence there is an urgent need to identify a low-cost technique to decontaminate such heavily polluted sites. In this chapter, we have reviewed several papers and discussed how different types of engineered biochars can be effectively used to adsorb contaminants from dumpsite soil. Biochars are basically carbon-rich solids treated by high-temperature pyrolysis. Biochars are obtained by heating biomass in presence of less oxygen or in anaerobic conditon. Properly pyrolysed mixtures of organic and cellulosic wastes are capable of adsorbing a wide variety of organic contaminants from wastewater, sludge and soil prior to the release or disposal in engineered landfills. Biochar produced from waste organic material such as coconut shells, sugarcane bagasse and straw has been reported with high adsorption capacity. Because locally produced waste organic material can be utilized for production of these low-cost adsorbents, they are especially attractive for remediation and treatment systems in developing countries. Pyrolytic temperature is believed to be the most important factor affecting the sorption capacity of biochar, followed by grinding to increase the surface area. Holding and adsorption capacity of the biochar for treating contaminants in soil could be a limiting factor of these materials. Some studies have shown that less than 5–7% (m/m) mixing of biochar and soil resulted in higher water retention capacity leading to increased potential for biodegradation. We therefore suggest that improved low-cost processing methods should be investigated so that biochar can be exploited as an adsorptive medium for remediating and treating contaminated soils in these regions.

Keywords

Open municipal dumpsites Biochar Pyrolytic temperature Cost-effective Adsorption capacity Incomplete combustion Organic content 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank MoEFCC (Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change) for the project given to Dr. Paromita Chakraborty No. Q-14011/43/2013-CPW (EHC). PC would also like to acknowledge the Water Advanced Research and Innovation (WARI) Fellowship Program supported by the Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL), the Daugherty Water for Food Institute (DWFI) and the Indo-US Science and Technology Forum (IUSSTF).

References

  1. Agrafioti, E., Kalderis, D., & Diamadopoulos, E. (2014). Ca and Fe modified biochars as adsorbents of arsenic and chromium in aqueous solutions. Journal of Environmental Management, 146, 444–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad, M., Lee, S. S., Dou, X., Mohan, D., Sung, J.-K., Yang, J. E., & Ok, Y. S. (2012). Effects of pyrolysis temperature on soybean stover-and peanut shell-derived biochar properties and TCE adsorption in water. Bioresource Technology, 118, 536–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad, M., Rajapaksha, A. U., Lim, J. E., Zhang, M., Bolan, N., Mohan, D., Vithanage, M., Lee, S. S., & Ok, Y. S. (2014). Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: A review. Chemosphere, 99, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexis, M., Rasse, D. P., Rumpel, C., Bardoux, G., Péchot, N., Schmalzer, P., Drake, B., & Mariotti, A. (2007). Fire impact on C and N losses and charcoal production in a scrub oak ecosystem. Biogeochemistry, 82, 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amonette, J. E., & Joseph, S. (2009). Characteristics of biochar: Microchemical properties. In Biochar for environmental management. Science and Technology (p. 33). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  6. Arun, S., Kothari, K., Mazumdar, D., Mukhopadhyay, M., & Chakraborty, P. (2017). Biochar production from domestic sludge: A cost-effective, recycled product for removal of amoxicillin in wastewater. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 225, 012164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrow, C. (2012). Biochar: Potential for countering land degradation and for improving agriculture. Applied Geography, 34, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beesley, L., Moreno-Jiménez, E., & Gomez-Eyles, J. L. (2010). Effects of biochar and greenwaste compost amendments on mobility, bioavailability and toxicity of inorganic and organic contaminants in a multi-element polluted soil. Environmental Pollution, 158, 2282–2287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beesley, L., & Dickinson, N. (2011). Carbon and trace element fluxes in the pore water of an urban soil following greenwaste compost, woody and biochar amendments, inoculated with the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 43, 188–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beesley, L., & Marmiroli, M. (2011). The immobilisation and retention of soluble arsenic, cadmium and zinc by biochar. Environmental Pollution, 159, 474–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beesley, L., Moreno-Jiménez, E., Gomez-Eyles, J. L., Harris, E., Robinson, B., & Sizmur, T. (2011). A review of biochars’ potential role in the remediation, revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils. Environmental Pollution, 159, 3269–3282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boehm, H. (1994). Some aspects of the surface chemistry of carbon blacks and other carbons. Carbon, 32, 759–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buzier, R., Tusseau-Vuillemin, M.-H., dit Meriadec, C. M., Rousselot, O., & Mouchel, J.-M. (2006). Trace metal speciation and fluxes within a major French wastewater treatment plant: Impact of the successive treatments stages. Chemosphere, 65, 2419–2426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cantrell, K. B., Hunt, P. G., Uchimiya, M., Novak, J. M., & Ro, K. S. (2012). Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresource Technology, 107, 419–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cao, X., Ma, L., Gao, B., & Harris, W. (2009). Dairy-manure derived biochar effectively sorbs lead and atrazine. Environmental Science & Technology, 43, 3285–3291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chakraborty, P., Zhang, G., Eckhardt, S., Li, J., Breivik, K., Lam, P. K., Tanabe, S., & Jones, K. C. (2013). Atmospheric polychlorinated biphenyls in Indian cities: Levels, emission sources and toxicity equivalents. Environmental Pollution, 182, 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chakraborty, P., Zhang, G., Li, J., Sivakumar, A., & Jones, K. C. (2015). Occurrence and sources of selected organochlorine pesticides in the soil of seven major Indian cities: Assessment of air–soil exchange. Environmental Pollution, 204, 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chakraborty, P., Khuman, S. N., Selvaraj, S., Sampath, S., Devi, N. L., Bang, J. J., & Katsoyiannis, A. (2016). Polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides in River Brahmaputra from the outer Himalayan Range and River Hooghly emptying into the Bay of Bengal: Occurrence, sources and ecotoxicological risk assessment. Environmental Pollution, 219, 998–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chakraborty, P., Selvaraj, S., Nakamura, M., Prithiviraj, B., Cincinelli, A., & Bang, J. J. (2018). PCBs and PCDD/Fs in soil from informal e-waste recycling sites and open dumpsites in India: Levels, congener profiles and health risk assessment. Science of the Total Environment 621, 930–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen, B., Zhou, D., & Zhu, L. (2008). Transitional adsorption and partition of nonpolar and polar aromatic contaminants by biochars of pine needles with different pyrolytic temperatures. Environmental Science & Technology, 42, 5137–5143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen, B., & Chen, Z. (2009). Sorption of naphthalene and 1-naphthol by biochars of orange peels with different pyrolytic temperatures. Chemosphere, 76, 127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen, B., & Yuan, M. (2011). Enhanced sorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by soil amended with biochar. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 11, 62–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chen, X.-W., Wong, J. T.-F., Ng, C. W.-W., & Wong, M.-H. (2016). Feasibility of biochar application on a landfill final cover—A review on balancing ecology and shallow slope stability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, 7111–7125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Choppala, G. K., Bolan, N., Megharaj, M., Chen, Z., & Naidu, R. (2012). The influence of biochar and black carbon on reduction and bioavailability of chromate in soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, 1175–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chun, Y., Sheng, G., Chiou, C. T., & Xing, B. (2004). Compositions and sorptive properties of crop residue-derived chars. Environmental Science & Technology, 38, 4649–4655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Debela, F., Thring, R., & Arocena, J. (2012). Immobilization of heavy metals by co-pyrolysis of contaminated soil with woody biomass. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 223, 1161–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Downie, A., Crosky, A., & Munroe, P. (2009). Physical properties of biochar. In Biochar for environmental management: Science and technology (pp. 13–32). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  28. Duku, M. H., Gu, S., & Hagan, E. B. (2011). Biochar production potential in Ghana—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 3539–3551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eckel, H., Roth, U., Döhler, H., & Schultheis, U. (2008). Assessment and reduction of heavy metal input into agro-ecosystems. In P. Schlegel & A. W. Durosoy S Jongbloed (Eds.), Trace elements in animal production systems (pp. 33–43). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Fellet, G., Marchiol, L., Delle Vedove, G., & Peressotti, A. (2011). Application of biochar on mine tailings: Effects and perspectives for land reclamation. Chemosphere, 83, 1262–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Feng, Y., Dionysiou, D. D., Wu, Y., Zhou, H., Xue, L., He, S., & Yang, L. (2013). Adsorption of dyestuff from aqueous solutions through oxalic acid-modified swede rape straw: Adsorption process and disposal methodology of depleted bioadsorbents. Bioresource Technology, 138, 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frazzoli, C., Orisakwe, O. E., Dragone, R., & Mantovani, A. (2010). Diagnostic health risk assessment of electronic waste on the general population in developing countries’ scenarios. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30, 388–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gadde, B., Bonnet, S., Menke, C., & Garivait, S. (2009). Air pollutant emissions from rice straw open field burning in India, Thailand and the Philippines. Environmental Pollution, 157, 1554–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Glaser, B., Lehmann, J., Steiner, C., Nehls, T., Yousaf, M., & Zech, W. (2002). Potential of pyrolyzed organic matter in soil amelioration, 12th ISCO conference (pp. 421–427). Beijing.Google Scholar
  35. Gomez-Eyles, J. L., Sizmur, T., Collins, C. D., & Hodson, M. E. (2011). Effects of biochar and the earthworm Eisenia fetida on the bioavailability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and potentially toxic elements. Environmental Pollution, 159, 616–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hameed, B., & El-Khaiary, M. (2008). Malachite green adsorption by rattan sawdust: Isotherm, kinetic and mechanism modeling. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 159, 574–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hartley, W., Dickinson, N. M., Riby, P., & Lepp, N. W. (2009). Arsenic mobility in brownfield soils amended with green waste compost or biochar and planted with Miscanthus. Environmental Pollution, 157, 2654–2662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. He, Z. L., Yang, X. E., & Stoffella, P. J. (2005). Trace elements in agroecosystems and impacts on the environment. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, 19, 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Inanc, B., Idris, A., Terazono, A., & Sakai, S.-i. (2004). Development of a database of landfills and dump sites in Asian countries. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 6, 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Inyang, M., & Dickenson, E. (2015). The potential role of biochar in the removal of organic and microbial contaminants from potable and reuse water: A review. Chemosphere, 134, 232–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Islam, M. T., Abdullah, A., Shahir, S., Kalam, M., Masjuki, H., Shumon, R., & Rashid, M. H. (2016). A public survey on knowledge, awareness, attitude and willingness to pay for WEEE management: Case study in Bangladesh. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 728–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jeong, C. Y., Wang, J. J., Dodla, S. K., Eberhardt, T. L., & Groom, L. (2012). Effect of biochar amendment on tylosin adsorption–desorption and transport in two different soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, 1185–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jiang, J., Xu, R.-k., T-y, J., & Li, Z. (2012a). Immobilization of Cu (II), Pb (II) and Cd (II) by the addition of rice straw derived biochar to a simulated polluted Ultisol. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 229, 145–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jiang, T.-Y., Jiang, J., Xu, R.-K., & Li, Z. (2012b). Adsorption of Pb (II) on variable charge soils amended with rice-straw derived biochar. Chemosphere, 89, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jung, K.-W., Kim, K., Jeong, T.-U., & Ahn, K.-H. (2016). Influence of pyrolysis temperature on characteristics and phosphate adsorption capability of biochar derived from waste-marine macroalgae (Undaria pinnatifida roots). Bioresource Technology, 200, 1024–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kabata-Pendias, A., & Pendias, H. (2001). Trace elements in soils and plants (3rd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  47. Karami, N., Clemente, R., Moreno-Jiménez, E., Lepp, N. W., & Beesley, L. (2011). Efficiency of green waste compost and biochar soil amendments for reducing lead and copper mobility and uptake to ryegrass. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 191, 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kloss, S., Zehetner, F., Dellantonio, A., Hamid, R., Ottner, F., Liedtke, V., Schwanninger, M., Gerzabek, M. H., & Soja, G. (2012). Characterization of slow pyrolysis biochars: Effects of feedstocks and pyrolysis temperature on biochar properties. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, 990–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Korthals, G. W., van de Ende, A., van Megen, H., Lexmond, T. M., Kammenga, J. E., & Bongers, T. (1996). Short-term effects of cadmium, copper, nickel and zinc on soil nematodes from different feeding and life-history strategy groups. Applied Soil Ecology, 4, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lehmann, J., da Silva, J. P., Steiner, C., Nehls, T., Zech, W., & Glaser, B. (2003). Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: Fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant and Soil, 249, 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lehmann, J., Rillig, M. C., Thies, J., Masiello, C. A., Hockaday, W. C., & Crowley, D. (2011). Biochar effects on soil biota–a review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43, 1812–1836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S. (2015). Biochar for environmental management: Science, technology and implementation. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Li, R., Wang, J. J., Zhou, B., Awasthi, M. K., Ali, A., Zhang, Z., Lahori, A. H., & Mahar, A. (2016). Recovery of phosphate from aqueous solution by magnesium oxide decorated magnetic biochar and its potential as phosphate-based fertilizer substitute. Bioresource Technology, 215, 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lu, H., Zhang, W., Yang, Y., Huang, X., Wang, S., & Qiu, R. (2012). Relative distribution of Pb 2+ sorption mechanisms by sludge-derived biochar. Water Research, 46, 854–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Luo, L., Ma, Y., Zhang, S., Wei, D., & Zhu, Y.-G. (2009). An inventory of trace element inputs to agricultural soils in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 2524–2530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ma, J., Wang, H., & Luo, Q. (2007). Movement-adsorption and its mechanism of Cd in soil under combining effects of electrokinetics and a new type of bamboo charcoal. Huan jing ke xue= Huanjing kexue/[bian ji, Zhongguo ke xue yuan huan jing ke xue wei yuan hui “Huan jing ke xue” bian ji wei yuan hui], 28, 1829–1834.Google Scholar
  57. McCarl, B. A., Peacocke, C., Chrisman, R., Kung, C.-C., & Sands, R. D. (2009). Economics of biochar production, utilization and greenhouse gas offsets. In Biochar for environmental management Science and Technology (pp. 341–358). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  58. Méndez, A., Gómez, A., Paz-Ferreiro, J., & Gascó, G. (2012). Effects of sewage sludge biochar on plant metal availability after application to a Mediterranean soil. Chemosphere, 89, 1354–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Minh, N. H., Minh, T. B., Watanabe, M., Kunisue, T., Monirith, I., Tanabe, S., Sakai, S., Subramanian, A., Sasikumar, K., Viet, P. H., Tuyen, B. C., Tana, T. S., & Prudente, M. S. (2003). Open dumping site in Asian developing countries: A potential source of polychlorinated dibenzo-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans. Environmental Science & Technology 37 (8):1493–1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mohan, D., Rajput, S., Singh, V. K., Steele, P. H., & Pittman, C. U., Jr. (2011). Modeling and evaluation of chromium remediation from water using low-cost bio-char, a green adsorbent. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 188, 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mohan, D., Sarswat, A., Ok, Y. S., & Pittman, C. U. (2014). Organic and inorganic contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low-cost and sustainable adsorbent–a critical review. Bioresource Technology, 160, 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mulligan, C., Yong, R., & Gibbs, B. (2001). Remediation technologies for metal-contaminated soils and groundwater: An evaluation. Engineering Geology, 60, 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Namgay, T., Singh, B., & Singh, B. (2010). Plant availability of arsenic and cadmium as influenced by biochar application to soil, 19th world congress of soil science.Google Scholar
  64. Nigam, P., Armour, G., Banat, I., Singh, D., & Marchant, R. (2000). Physical removal of textile dyes from effluents and solid-state fermentation of dye-adsorbed agricultural residues. Bioresource Technology, 72, 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Novak, J. M., Lima, I., Xing, B., Gaskin, J. W., Steiner, C., Das, K., Ahmedna, M., Rehrah, D., Watts, D. W., & Busscher, W. J. (2009). Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Annals of Environmental Science, 3, 195–206.Google Scholar
  66. Olafisoye, O. B., Adefioye, T., & Osibote, O. A. (2013). Heavy metals contamination of water, soil, and plants around an electronic waste dumpsite. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 22, 1431–1439.Google Scholar
  67. Oleszczuk, P., Hale, S. E., Lehmann, J., & Cornelissen, G. (2012). Activated carbon and biochar amendments decrease pore-water concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sewage sludge. Bioresource Technology, 111, 84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Park, J. H., Choppala, G. K., Bolan, N. S., Chung, J. W., & Chuasavathi, T. (2011). Biochar reduces the bioavailability and phytotoxicity of heavy metals. Plant and Soil, 348, 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pignatello, J. J., Kwon, S., & Lu, Y. (2006). Effect of natural organic substances on the surface and adsorptive properties of environmental black carbon (char): Attenuation of surface activity by humic and fulvic acids. Environmental Science & Technology, 40, 7757–7763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pratt, K., & Moran, D. (2010). Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of global biochar mitigation potential. Biomass and Bioenergy, 34, 1149–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Qiu, Y., Zheng, Z., Zhou, Z., & Sheng, G. D. (2009). Effectiveness and mechanisms of dye adsorption on a straw-based biochar. Bioresource Technology, 100, 5348–5351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reddy, K. R., Yargicoglu, E. N., Yue, D., & Yaghoubi, P. (2014). Enhanced microbial methane oxidation in landfill cover soil amended with biochar. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviromental Engineering, 140, 04014047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Robinson, B. H. (2009). E-waste: An assessment of global production and environmental impacts. Science of the Total Environment, 408, 183–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schnoor, J. L., Light, L. A., McCutcheon, S. C., Wolfe, N. L., & Carreia, L. H. (1995). Phytoremediation of organic and nutrient contaminants. Environmental Science & Technology, 29, 318A–323A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Serio, M. A., Chen, Y., Wójtowicz, M., & Suuberg, E. (2000). Pyrolysis processing of mixed solid waste streams. ACS Division of Fuel Chemistry Preprints, 45, 466–474.Google Scholar
  76. Shehzad, A., Bashir, M. J., Sethupathi, S., & Lim, J. W. (2016). An insight into the remediation of highly contaminated landfill leachate using sea mango based activated bio-char: Optimization, isothermal and kinetic studies. Desalination of Water Treatment, 57, 22244–22257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Shih, Y.-H., SJe, K., Tseng, C.-H., Wang, H.-C., Chen, L.-L., & Chang, Y.-M. (2016). Health risks and economic costs of exposure to PCDD/Fs from open burning: A case study in Nairobi, Kenya. Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health, 9, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Someya, M., Ohtake, M., Kunisue, T., Subramanian, A., Takahashi, S., Chakraborty, P., Ramachandran, R., & Tanabe, S. (2010). Persistent organic pollutants in breast milk of mothers residing around an open dumping site in Kolkata, India: Specific dioxin-like PCB levels and fish as a potential source. Environment International, 36, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Song, Y., Wang, F., Bian, Y., Kengara, F. O., Jia, M., Xie, Z., & Jiang, X. (2012a). Bioavailability assessment of hexachlorobenzene in soil as affected by wheat straw biochar. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 217, 391–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Song, Y., Wang, F., Yang, X., Bian, Y., Gu, C., Xie, Z., & Jiang, X. (2012b). Influence and assessment of biochar on the bioavailability of chlorobenzenes in soil. Huan Jing Ke Xue, 33, 169–174.Google Scholar
  81. Spokas, K. A., & Reicosky, D. C. (2009). Impacts of sixteen different biochars on soil greenhouse gas production. Annals of Environmental Science, 3, 179–193.Google Scholar
  82. Sun, K., Gao, B., Ro, K. S., Novak, J. M., Wang, Z., Herbert, S., & Xing, B. (2012). Assessment of herbicide sorption by biochars and organic matter associated with soil and sediment. Environmental Pollution, 163, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sun, Y., Gao, B., Yao, Y., Fang, J., Zhang, M., Zhou, Y., Chen, H., & Yang, L. (2014). Effects of feedstock type, production method, and pyrolysis temperature on biochar and hydrochar properties. Chemical Engineering Journal, 240, 574–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Suppadit, T., Phumkokrak, N., & Poungsuk, P. (2012). The effect of using quail litter biochar on soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) production. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 72, 244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tan, B. H., Teng, T. T., & Omar, A. M. (2000). Removal of dyes and industrial dye wastes by magnesium chloride. Water Research, 34, 597–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tang, J., Zhu, W., Kookana, R., & Katayama, A. (2013). Characteristics of biochar and its application in remediation of contaminated soil. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 116, 653–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tao, S., Xu, F., Wang, X., Liu, W., Gong, Z., Fang, J., Zhu, L., & Luo, Y. (2005). Organochlorine pesticides in agricultural soil and vegetables from Tianjin, China. Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 2494–2499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Thanh, N. P., & Matsui, Y. (2011). Municipal solid waste management in Vietnam: Status and the strategic actions. International Journal of Environmental Research, 5, 285–296.Google Scholar
  89. Thies, J. E., & Rillig, M. C. (2009). Characteristics of biochar: Biological properties. In Biochar for environmental management: Science and Technology (pp. 85–105). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  90. Thitame, S. N., Pondhe, G., & Meshram, D. (2010). Characterisation and composition of municipal solid waste (MSW) generated in Sangamner city, district Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 170, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tong, X.-j., Li, J.-y., Yuan, J.-h., & R-k, X. (2011). Adsorption of Cu (II) by biochars generated from three crop straws. Chemical Engineering Journal, 172, 828–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ubbelohde, A. R., & Lewis, F. A. (1960). Graphite and its crystal compounds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  93. Uchimiya, M., Lima, I. M., Thomas Klasson, K., Chang, S., Wartelle, L. H., & Rodgers, J. E. (2010). Immobilization of heavy metal ions (CuII, CdII, NiII, and PbII) by broiler litter-derived biochars in water and soil. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 58, 5538–5544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wang, H., Lin, K., Hou, Z., Richardson, B., & Gan, J. (2010). Sorption of the herbicide terbuthylazine in two New Zealand forest soils amended with biosolids and biochars. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 10, 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wang, S., Gao, B., & Li, Y. (2016). Enhanced arsenic removal by biochar modified with nickel (Ni) and manganese (Mn) oxyhydroxides. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 37, 361–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Willmott, N., Guthrie, J., & Nelson, G. (1998). The biotechnology approach to colour removal from textile effluent. Coloration Technology, 114, 38–41.Google Scholar
  97. Xu, T., Lou, L., Luo, L., Cao, R., Duan, D., & Chen, Y. (2012). Effect of bamboo biochar on pentachlorophenol leachability and bioavailability in agricultural soil. Science of the Total Environment, 414, 727–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Yang, R.-q., Jiang, G.-b., Zhou, Q.-f., Yuan, C.-g., & Shi, J.-b. (2005). Occurrence and distribution of organochlorine pesticides (HCH and DDT) in sediments collected from East China Sea. Environment International, 31, 799–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Yang, X.-B., Ying, G.-G., Peng, P.-A., Wang, L., Zhao, J.-L., Zhang, L.-J., Yuan, P., & He, H.-P. (2010). Influence of biochars on plant uptake and dissipation of two pesticides in an agricultural soil. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 58, 7915–7921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Yip, K., Wu, H., & D-k, Z. (2007). Effect of inherent moisture in collie coal during pyrolysis due to in-situ steam gasification. Energy & Fuels, 21, 2883–2891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Yu, X.-Y., Ying, G.-G., & Kookana, R. S. (2006). Sorption and desorption behaviors of diuron in soils amended with charcoal. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 54, 8545–8550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Yu, X.-Y., Ying, G.-G., & Kookana, R. S. (2009). Reduced plant uptake of pesticides with biochar additions to soil. Chemosphere, 76, 665–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Yu, X., Wang, D., Mu, C., & Liu, X. (2011). Role of biochar in slow sorption and desorption of diuron in soil. Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 27, 1011–1015.Google Scholar
  104. Zhang, H., Lin, K., Wang, H., & Gan, J. (2010). Effect of Pinus radiata derived biochars on soil sorption and desorption of phenanthrene. Environmental Pollution, 158, 2821–2825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Zhang, X., Wang, H., He, L., Lu, K., Sarmah, A., Li, J., Bolan, N. S., Pei, J., & Huang, H. (2013). Using biochar for remediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals and organic pollutants. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 20, 8472–8483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Zhao, L., Cao, X., Mašek, O., & Zimmerman, A. (2013). Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 256, 1–9.Google Scholar
  107. Zheng, W., Guo, M., Chow, T., Bennett, D. N., & Rajagopalan, N. (2010). Sorption properties of greenwaste biochar for two triazine pesticides. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 181, 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zhou, J., Deng, C., Chen, J., & Zhang, Q. (2008). Remediation effects of cotton stalk carbon on cadmium (Cd) contaminated soil. Ecology and Environment, 17, 1857–1860.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paromita Chakraborty
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Moitraiyee Mukhopadhyay
    • 1
  • R. Shruthi
    • 1
  • Debayan Mazumdar
    • 4
  • Daniel Snow
    • 3
  • Jim Jian Wang
    • 5
  1. 1.Department Of Civil EngineeringSRM Institute of Science and TechnologyKancheepuram districtIndia
  2. 2.SRM Research InstituteSRM Institute of Science and TechnologyKancheepuram districtIndia
  3. 3.Water Science LaboratoryUniversity of NebraskaLincolnUSA
  4. 4.Department of Chemical EngineeringSRM Institute of Science and TechnologyKancheepuram districtIndia
  5. 5.School of Plant, Environmental and Soil SciencesLouisiana State University Agricultural CenterBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations