Ethical Considerations in Photography as a Research Method

Chapter

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of the ethical issues that social researchers might encounter when employing photographic methods. We begin with a discussion dignity as the main ethical foundation of research photography, followed by an examination of the related issues of power and consent. Particular attention is paid to working with vulnerable and groups. The chapter concludes with a discussion of anonymisation. This is particularly difficult problem faced by research photographers who must decide whether protecting the identity of research participants (for example, through pixilation of faces) could be a destruction of their identity thus creating harm in a different way. This chapter provides invaluable insights for social researchers grappling with the ethical dimensions of a research project.

Keywords

Consent Anonymity Recognition Vulnerability Power Intervention 

References

  1. Adler, A. (1996). Photography on trial. Index on Censorship, 25(3), 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldridge, J. (2012). The participation of vulnerable children in photographic research. Visual Studies, 27(1), 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldridge, J. (2014). Working with vulnerable groups in social research: dilemmas by default and design. Qualitative Research, 14(1), 112–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, D. (2002). Research involving vulnerable young people: A discussion of ethical and methodological concerns. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 9(3), 275–283.Google Scholar
  5. Allen, L. (2015). Losing face? Photo-anonymisation and visual research integrity. Visual Studies, 30(3), 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, R. (2011). Sontag’s argument: Photographic interventions, etc. Savage Minds. Retrieved from https://savageminds.org/2011/05/31/sontags-argument-photographic-interventions/.
  7. Banks, M. (2001). Visual methods in social research. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banks, M. (2008). Using visual data in qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Barker, J., & Smith, F. (2012). What’s in focus? A critical discussion of photography, children and young people. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15(2), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barthes, R. (1981). Camera lucida: Reflections on photography. Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Becker, H. S. (1988). Foreword: Images, ethics, and organizations. In Image ethics: The moral rights of subjects in photographs, film, and television. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Benitez, O., Devaux, D., & Dausset, J. (2002). Audiovisual documentation of oral consent: A new method of informed consent for illiterate populations. The Lancet, 359(9315), 1406–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berle, I. (2008). Clinical photography and patient rights: The need for orthopraxy. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(2), 89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bhattacharya, K. (2007). Consenting to the consent form: What are the fixed and fluid understandings between the researcher and the researched? Qualitative Inquiry, 13(8), 1095–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boxall, K., & Ralph, S. (2009). Research ethics and the use of visual images in research with people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 34(1), 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Butler, I. (2002). A code of ethics for social work and social care research. British Journal of Social Work, 32(2), 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Butler, J. (2005). Photography, war, outrage. PMLA, 120(3), 822–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chambers, E. (1997). Tourism and culture: An applied perspective. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  19. Clark, A. (2006). Anonymising Research Data. In: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, (pp. 1–21).Google Scholar
  20. Clark, A. (2013). Haunted by images? Ethical moments and anxieties in visual research. Methodological Innovations Online, 8(2), 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clark, A., Prosser, J., & Wiles, R. (2010). Ethical issues in image-based research. Arts & Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice, 2(1), 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Close, H. (2007). The use of photography as a qualitative research tool: With reference to her own study of children with long-term conditions, Helen Close considers whether photography as a research method can be both valuable and ethical. Nurse Researcher, 15(1), 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Coomber, R. (2002). Signing your life away?: why research ethics committees (REC) shouldn’t always require written confirmation that participants in research have been informed of the aims of a study and their rights-the case of criminal populations. (Commentary). Sociological Research Online, 7(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Corti, L., Day, A., & Backhouse, G. (2000) Confidentiality and informed consent: Issues for consideration in the preservation of and provision of access to qualitative data archives, forum: Qualitative social research. Retrieved (2009, March 12) from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1024/2208.
  25. Cox, S., Drew, S., Guillemin, M., Howell, C., Warr, D., & Waycott, J. (2014). Guidelines for ethical visual research methods. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  26. Creighton, S., Alderson, J., Brown, S., & Minto, C. (2002). Medical photography: ethics, consent and the intersex patient. BJU International, 89(1), 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Davison, J. (2004). Dilemmas in research: Issues of vulnerability and disempowerment for the social worker/researcher. Journal of Social Work Practice, 18(3), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Edwards, E. (2015). Anthropology and photography: A long history of knowledge and affect. Photographies, 8(3), 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Finch, Janet. (1984). “It’s great to have someone to talk to”: The ethics and politics of interviewing women. In Colin Bell & Helen Roberts (Eds.), Social researching: Politics, problems, practice (pp. 70–87). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  30. Fitzgerald, D. W., Marotte, C., Verdier, R. I., Johnson, W. D., & Pape, J. W. (2002). Comprehension during informed consent in a less-developed country. The Lancet, 360(9342), 1301–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fluehr-Lobban, C. (1994). Informed consent in anthropological research: We Are not exempt1. Human Organization, 53(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Foucault M (1977) Discipline and punish (Sheridan a trans). Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  33. Foucault, M. (1980). Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Foucault, M. (2001). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  35. Gallagher, M. (2008). Foucault, power and participation. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 16(3), 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Garland-Thomson, R. (2001). Seeing the disabled: Visual rhetorics of disability in popular photography (pp. 335–374). The new disability history: American perspectives.Google Scholar
  37. Geurts, M. (2015). The Atrocity of representing atrocity-watching kevin carter’s’ struggling girl’. Aesthetic Investigations, 1(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  38. Grinyer, A. (2002). The anonymity of research participants: Assumptions, ethics and practicalities, social research update. Guildford: University of Surrey.Google Scholar
  39. Hannes, K., & Parylo, O. (2014). Let’s play it safe: Ethical considerations from participants in a photovoice research project. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Harley, A. (2012). Picturing reality: Power, ethics, and politics in using photovoice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 320–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hugman, R., Pittaway, E., & Bartolomei, L. (2011). When ‘do no harm’is not enough: The ethics of research with refugees and other vulnerable groups. British Journal of Social Work, 41(7), 1271–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hurdley, R. (2010). In the picture or off the wall? Ethical regulation, research habitus, and unpeopled ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Iqbal, N. (2010). US photographer Steve McCurry: Go with the flow. In The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2010/jun/28/steve-mccurry-photography.
  44. Jacobsen, K., & Landau, L. B. (2003). The dual imperative in refugee research: Some methodological and ethical considerations in social science research on forced migration. Disasters, 27(3), 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Joffe, S., Cook, E. F., Cleary, P. D., Clark, J. W., & Weeks, J. C. (2001). Quality of informed consent: a new measure of understanding among research subjects. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 93(2), 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jones, B. (1994). Ethics, morals and patient photography. Journal of Audiovisual Media in Medicine, 17(2), 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kim, Y. S. (2012). Photographers’ ethical calls may rest on ‘it depends’. Newspaper Research Journal, 33(1), 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kimmel, A. (1988). Ethics and values in applied social research (Vol. 12). London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Langmann, S., & Pick, D. (2014). Dignity and ethics in research photography. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(6), 709–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Larkin, K., & Cooper, M. (2009). Into recession: Vulnerability and resilience in Leeds, Brighton and Bristol. London: Centre for Cities.Google Scholar
  51. Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (1983). The good high school: Portraits of character and culture. Basic Books. Google Scholar
  52. Lickiss, N. (2007). On human dignity: Fragments of an exploration (pp. 27–41). Perspectives on human dignity: A conversation.Google Scholar
  53. Lie, R., & Witteveen, L. (2017). Visual informed consent: Informed consent without forms. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(1), 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Maizland, L. (2013). The lenses of truth: Photographers’ moral responsibility to document injustice in most situations. Retrieved from https://www.american.edu/cas/literature/cwp/upload/WaW-Winning-Essay.pdf.
  55. Marion, G., & Izard, R. (1986). The journalist in life-saving situations: Detached observer or good Samaritan? Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 1(2), 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mehnert, A., Schröder, A., Puhlmann, K., Müllerleile, U., & Koch, U. (2006). Würde in der Begleitung schwer kranker und sterbender Patienten. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz, 49(11), 1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mertens, D. M., & Ginsberg, P. E. (2009). The handbook of social research ethics. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Miller, T., & Bell, L. (2002). Consenting to what? Issues of access, gate-keeping and ‘informed’consent. In T. Miller, M. Birch, M. Mauthner, & J. Jessop (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 61–75). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  59. Moore, L. W., & Miller, M. (1999). Initiating research with doubly vulnerable populations. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30(5), 1034–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pain, H. (2012). A literature review to evaluate the choice and use of visual methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Palmer, D. (2011). In naked repose: The face of candid portrait photography. Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 12(1), 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Papademas, D., & Association, I. V. S. (2009). IVSA code of research ethics and guidelines. Visual Studies, 24(3), 250–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Parsons, S. (2009). Sontag’s lament: Emotion, ethics, and photography. Photography and Culture, 2(3), 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pauwels, L. (2008). Taking and using: Ethical issues of photographs for research purposes. Visual Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pink, S. (2006). Doing visual ethnography: Images, media and representation in research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  66. Pink, S. (2012). Advances in visual methodology. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pittaway, E., Bartolomei, L., & Hugman, R. (2010). ‘Stop stealing our stories’: The ethics of research with vulnerable groups. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2(2), 229–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Plummer, S. (2015). Photography as expanding form: Virtual and actual expansion in the work of Saron Hughes and Martina Corry. Photographies, 8(2), 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Plunkett, R., Leipert, B. D., & Ray, S. L. (2013). Unspoken phenomena: Using the photovoice method to enrich phenomenological inquiry. Nursing Inquiry, 20(2), 156–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Prins, E. (2010). Participatory photography: A tool for empowerment or surveillance? Action Research, 8(4), 426–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Prosser, J. (2000). The moral maze of image ethics situated ethics in educational research (pp. 116–132). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. Prosser, J., Clark, A., & Wiles, R. (2012). Visual research ethics at the crossroads. In J. Hughes (Ed.), SAGE visual methods (Vol. 1, pp. 329–356). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  73. Rhoades, R. E., & Nazarea, V. (2006). Reconciling local and global agendas in sustainable development: Participatory research with indigenous Andean communities. Journal of Mountain Science, 3(4), 334–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Riessman, C. K. (2005). Exporting ethics: A narrative about narrative research in South India. Health, 9(4), 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Roberts, B. (2011). Photographic portraits: Narrative and memory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(2), 1–45.Google Scholar
  76. Rolph, S., Johnson, J., & Smith, R. (2009). Using photography to understand change and continuity in the history of residential care for older people. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(5), 421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Russell, A. C., & Diaz, N. D. (2013). Photography in social work research: Using visual image to humanize findings. Qualitative Social Work, 12(4), 433–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schwarzschild, E. L. (1996). Revising vulnerability: Henry James’s confrontation with photography. Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 38(1), 51–78.Google Scholar
  79. Sempik, J., Aldridge, J., & Becker, S. (2005). Health, well-being, and social inclusion: therapeutic horticulture in the UK. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  80. Sime, D. (2008). Ethical and methodological issues in engaging young people living in poverty with participatory research methods. Children’s geographies, 6(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sin, C. H. (2005). Seeking informed consent: Reflections on research practice. Sociology, 39(2), 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sontag, S. (1977). On photography. Macmillan.Google Scholar
  83. Spencer, S. (2010). Visual research methods in the social sciences: Awakening visions. Routledge.Google Scholar
  84. Stamets, R. S. (1994). Were his priorities out of focus? St. Petersburg Times.Google Scholar
  85. Steel, R. (2003). Brief summary and checklist for researchers, research commissioners and research groups for involving vulnerable and marginalised people (pp. 1–3). Eastleigh: INVOLVE.Google Scholar
  86. Steel, R. (2005). Actively involving marginalized and vulnerable people in research. In L. Lowes & I. Hulatt (Eds.), Involving service users in health and social care research (pp. 18–29). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  87. Suchar, C. S. (1997). Grounding visual sociology research in shooting scripts. Qualitative Sociology, 20(1), 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Supe, A. (2003). Ethical considerations in medical photography. Issues Med Ethics, 11, 83–84.Google Scholar
  89. Sweetman, P. (2009). Just anybody? Images, ethics and recognition. In J Gillett & R. Leino (Eds.), Just anybody (pp. 7–9). Winchester: The Winchester Gallery.Google Scholar
  90. Szto, P., Furman, R., & Langer, C. (2005). Poetry and photography: An exploration into expressive/creative qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work, 4(2), 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tewksbury, R., & Gagné, P. (1997). Assumed and presumed identities: Problems of self-presentation in field research. Sociological Spectrum, 17(2), 127–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Thallon, N.-L. (2004). You Press the Button, I’ll do the rest: A study of participatory photography projects with vulnerable groups. The Photographic, 14, 1–10.Google Scholar
  93. Tinkler, P. (2014a). Ethical issues and legalities. In P. Tinkler (Ed.), Using photographs in social and historical research (pp. 195–208). London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tinkler, P. (2014b). Generating photos: Researchers. In P. Tinkler (Ed.), Using photographs in social and historical research (pp. 124–148). London: Sage Publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Waterhouse, J. (2007). From narratives to portraits: Methodology and methods to portray leadership. The Curriculum Journal, 18(3), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wiles, R., Coffey, A., Robinson, J., & Heath, S. (2012a). Anonymisation and visual images: Issues of respect, ‘voice’and protection. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15(1), 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wiles, R., Coffey, A., Robison, J., & Prosser, J. (2012b). Ethical regulation and visual methods: Making visual research impossible or developing good practice? Sociological Research Online, 17(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wiles, R., Heath, S., Crow, G., & Charles, V. (2005). Informed consent in social research: A literature review. NCRM Methods Review Papers, 1, 1–27.Google Scholar
  99. Wiles, R., Prosser, J., Bagnoli, A., Clark, A., Davies, K., Holland, S., et al. (2008). Visual ethics: Ethical issues in visual research. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.Google Scholar
  100. Williams, L. (1997). The ethics of intervention. In C. Berry, A. Hamilton, & L. Jayamanne (Eds.), Dennis O’Rourke’s The Good Woman of Bangkok. Sydney: Power Publications.Google Scholar
  101. Williams, L. (1999). The ethics of intervention: Dennis O’Rourke’s the good woman of Bangkok. In M. Renov & J. Gaines (Eds.), Collecting visible evidence (pp. 176–189). London, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  102. Witko, C. (2011). Pulitzer prize photograph brings awareness—At a price. e-Vision, 12. Retrieved from https://www.jmu.edu/evision/Volume12/Witko.html.
  103. Woodward, S. (2008). Digital photography and research relationships: Capturing the fashion moment. Sociology, 42(5), 857–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Curtin Business SchoolPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations