Ethical Considerations in Photography as a Research Method
The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of the ethical issues that social researchers might encounter when employing photographic methods. We begin with a discussion dignity as the main ethical foundation of research photography, followed by an examination of the related issues of power and consent. Particular attention is paid to working with vulnerable and groups. The chapter concludes with a discussion of anonymisation. This is particularly difficult problem faced by research photographers who must decide whether protecting the identity of research participants (for example, through pixilation of faces) could be a destruction of their identity thus creating harm in a different way. This chapter provides invaluable insights for social researchers grappling with the ethical dimensions of a research project.
KeywordsConsent Anonymity Recognition Vulnerability Power Intervention
- Allen, D. (2002). Research involving vulnerable young people: A discussion of ethical and methodological concerns. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 9(3), 275–283.Google Scholar
- Anderson, R. (2011). Sontag’s argument: Photographic interventions, etc. Savage Minds. Retrieved from https://savageminds.org/2011/05/31/sontags-argument-photographic-interventions/.
- Banks, M. (2008). Using visual data in qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Barthes, R. (1981). Camera lucida: Reflections on photography. Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Becker, H. S. (1988). Foreword: Images, ethics, and organizations. In Image ethics: The moral rights of subjects in photographs, film, and television. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Chambers, E. (1997). Tourism and culture: An applied perspective. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Clark, A. (2006). Anonymising Research Data. In: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, (pp. 1–21).Google Scholar
- Coomber, R. (2002). Signing your life away?: why research ethics committees (REC) shouldn’t always require written confirmation that participants in research have been informed of the aims of a study and their rights-the case of criminal populations. (Commentary). Sociological Research Online, 7(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Corti, L., Day, A., & Backhouse, G. (2000) Confidentiality and informed consent: Issues for consideration in the preservation of and provision of access to qualitative data archives, forum: Qualitative social research. Retrieved (2009, March 12) from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1024/2208.
- Cox, S., Drew, S., Guillemin, M., Howell, C., Warr, D., & Waycott, J. (2014). Guidelines for ethical visual research methods. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Finch, Janet. (1984). “It’s great to have someone to talk to”: The ethics and politics of interviewing women. In Colin Bell & Helen Roberts (Eds.), Social researching: Politics, problems, practice (pp. 70–87). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Foucault M (1977) Discipline and punish (Sheridan a trans). Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1980). Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (2001). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
- Garland-Thomson, R. (2001). Seeing the disabled: Visual rhetorics of disability in popular photography (pp. 335–374). The new disability history: American perspectives.Google Scholar
- Geurts, M. (2015). The Atrocity of representing atrocity-watching kevin carter’s’ struggling girl’. Aesthetic Investigations, 1(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
- Grinyer, A. (2002). The anonymity of research participants: Assumptions, ethics and practicalities, social research update. Guildford: University of Surrey.Google Scholar
- Iqbal, N. (2010). US photographer Steve McCurry: Go with the flow. In The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2010/jun/28/steve-mccurry-photography.
- Larkin, K., & Cooper, M. (2009). Into recession: Vulnerability and resilience in Leeds, Brighton and Bristol. London: Centre for Cities.Google Scholar
- Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (1983). The good high school: Portraits of character and culture. Basic Books. Google Scholar
- Lickiss, N. (2007). On human dignity: Fragments of an exploration (pp. 27–41). Perspectives on human dignity: A conversation.Google Scholar
- Maizland, L. (2013). The lenses of truth: Photographers’ moral responsibility to document injustice in most situations. Retrieved from https://www.american.edu/cas/literature/cwp/upload/WaW-Winning-Essay.pdf.
- Miller, T., & Bell, L. (2002). Consenting to what? Issues of access, gate-keeping and ‘informed’consent. In T. Miller, M. Birch, M. Mauthner, & J. Jessop (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 61–75). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Pink, S. (2006). Doing visual ethnography: Images, media and representation in research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Prosser, J. (2000). The moral maze of image ethics situated ethics in educational research (pp. 116–132). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Prosser, J., Clark, A., & Wiles, R. (2012). Visual research ethics at the crossroads. In J. Hughes (Ed.), SAGE visual methods (Vol. 1, pp. 329–356). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Roberts, B. (2011). Photographic portraits: Narrative and memory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(2), 1–45.Google Scholar
- Schwarzschild, E. L. (1996). Revising vulnerability: Henry James’s confrontation with photography. Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 38(1), 51–78.Google Scholar
- Sempik, J., Aldridge, J., & Becker, S. (2005). Health, well-being, and social inclusion: therapeutic horticulture in the UK. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
- Sontag, S. (1977). On photography. Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Spencer, S. (2010). Visual research methods in the social sciences: Awakening visions. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Stamets, R. S. (1994). Were his priorities out of focus? St. Petersburg Times.Google Scholar
- Steel, R. (2003). Brief summary and checklist for researchers, research commissioners and research groups for involving vulnerable and marginalised people (pp. 1–3). Eastleigh: INVOLVE.Google Scholar
- Steel, R. (2005). Actively involving marginalized and vulnerable people in research. In L. Lowes & I. Hulatt (Eds.), Involving service users in health and social care research (pp. 18–29). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Supe, A. (2003). Ethical considerations in medical photography. Issues Med Ethics, 11, 83–84.Google Scholar
- Sweetman, P. (2009). Just anybody? Images, ethics and recognition. In J Gillett & R. Leino (Eds.), Just anybody (pp. 7–9). Winchester: The Winchester Gallery.Google Scholar
- Thallon, N.-L. (2004). You Press the Button, I’ll do the rest: A study of participatory photography projects with vulnerable groups. The Photographic, 14, 1–10.Google Scholar
- Wiles, R., Heath, S., Crow, G., & Charles, V. (2005). Informed consent in social research: A literature review. NCRM Methods Review Papers, 1, 1–27.Google Scholar
- Wiles, R., Prosser, J., Bagnoli, A., Clark, A., Davies, K., Holland, S., et al. (2008). Visual ethics: Ethical issues in visual research. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.Google Scholar
- Williams, L. (1997). The ethics of intervention. In C. Berry, A. Hamilton, & L. Jayamanne (Eds.), Dennis O’Rourke’s The Good Woman of Bangkok. Sydney: Power Publications.Google Scholar
- Williams, L. (1999). The ethics of intervention: Dennis O’Rourke’s the good woman of Bangkok. In M. Renov & J. Gaines (Eds.), Collecting visible evidence (pp. 176–189). London, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Witko, C. (2011). Pulitzer prize photograph brings awareness—At a price. e-Vision, 12. Retrieved from https://www.jmu.edu/evision/Volume12/Witko.html.