Surgical Treatments for Adenomyosis

  • Mari KitadeEmail author
  • Makoto Jinushi
  • Shinichiro Ikuma
  • Keisuke Murakami
  • Rie Ozaki
  • Ayako Masuda
  • Keiji Kuroda
  • Jun Kumakiri
Part of the Comprehensive Gynecology and Obstetrics book series (CGO)


The objective of this prospective study performed at Juntendo University School of Medicine was to evaluate a novel method of laparoscopic adenomyomectomy (LA). The subjects were 76 women with adenomyosis who wished to conserve fertility.

Two methods of LA and hysteroplasty were used: wedge resection (WR) and the double flap method (DF). WR was performed on 22 women with exteriorly growing focal adenomyosis close to the serosal membrane, and DF was performed on 54 women with adenomyosis growing interiorly close to the endometrium. WR was performed by making a V-shaped notch to remove the adenomyotic nodule and surrounding serosa with a electric cautery. The remaining muscle layer was sutured so that hysteroplasty could be performed. For the DF procedure, after a transverse incision, the adenomyotic nodule was removed, with the remaining serosal tissue serving as the upper and lower flaps, which were overlapped and sutured.

For the operative outcome in the WR and DF groups, the average surgical duration was 118.6 ± 43.3 min and 144.0 ± 44.5 min, and the estimated blood loss was 172.1 ± 175.2 mL and 245.3 ± 232.3 mL, respectively. The visual analog scale of dysmenorrhea and hypermenorrhea was significantly decreased after surgery, and this trend continued for more than 3 years. Investigation by second-look laparoscopy showed that 3 out of 24 patients (12.5%) had de novo adhesion to the adnexa and 12 patients out of them (50%) had postoperative adhesions to the incision site of the uterus. All patients exhibited tubal patency with an indigo carmine solution used for chromotubation, but wound thinning was observed in only one patient by leakage of it. The postoperative pregnancy rate was 38.8% (12 out of 31 infertile patients), 73.3% (11 out of 15 pregnancies) of which resulted in live births. There were no severe complications during pregnancy and delivery.

In conclusion, LA was found to be safe and useful for minimally invasive surgery to conserve fertility.


Adenomyomectomy · Laparoscopy · Conservative surgery · Focal adenomyosis · Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy 


  1. 1.
    Mochimaru A, Aoki S, Oba MS, Kurasawa K, Takahashi T, Hirahara F. Adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with adenomyosis with uterine enlargement. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(4):529–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reinhold C, Tafazoli F, Wang L. Imaging features of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4(4):337–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Shimanuki H, Kumakiri J, Takeda S. Influencing factors of adhesion development and the efficacy of adhesion-preventing agents in patients undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy as evaluated by a second-look laparoscopy. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(5):1247–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shimanuki H, Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Kumakiri J, Kinoshita K. The effect of vasopressin on local and general circulation during laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13(3):190–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wood C. Surgical and medical treatment of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4(4):323–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morita M, Asakawa Y, Nakakuma M, Kubo H. Laparoscopic excision of myometrial adenomyomas in patients with adenomyosis uteri and main symptoms of severe dysmenorrhea and hypermenorrhea. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11(1):86–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chung YJ, Kang SY, Choi MR, Cho HH, Kim JH, Kim MR. Robot-assisted laparoscopic adenomyomectomy for patients who want to preserve fertility. Yonsei Med J. 2016;57(6):1531–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Shimanuki H, Kumakiri J, Kitano T, et al. Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy and hysteroplasty: a novel method. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13(2):150–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hyams LL. Adenomyosis; its conservative surgical treatment (hysteroplasty) in young women. N Y State J Med. 1952;52(22):2778–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Osada H, Silber S, Kakinuma T, Nagaishi M, Kato K, Kato O. Surgical procedure to conserve the uterus for future pregnancy in patients suffering from massive adenomyosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;22(1):94–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang X, Huang Q, Chen S, Zhang J, Lin K, Zhang X. Efficacy of laparoscopic adenomyomectomy using double-flap method for diffuse uterine adenomyosis. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Takeuchi H, Kuwatsuru R. The indications, surgical techniques, and limitations of laparoscopic myomectomy. JSLS. 2003;7(2):89–95.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Takeuchi H, Shimanuki H, Kobori H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Kinoshita K. Effect of vasopressin on blood flow and RI of the uterine artery during laparoscopic myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(1):10–1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mari Kitade
    • 1
    Email author
  • Makoto Jinushi
    • 1
  • Shinichiro Ikuma
    • 1
  • Keisuke Murakami
    • 1
  • Rie Ozaki
    • 1
  • Ayako Masuda
    • 1
  • Keiji Kuroda
    • 2
  • Jun Kumakiri
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyJuntendo University Faculty of MedicineTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Sugiyama ClinicTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyTokyo Women’s Medical University HospitalTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations