Korean Diaspora and the Moebius Strip: Sung Rno’s Yi Sang Counts to Thirteen and Transnational Avant-Garde Theater
This chapter discusses the production of Yi Sang Counts to Thirteen. The play, written by Korean American playwright Sung Rno, was directed by American director Lee Breuer and produced in Seoul, Korea in 2000. Sung Rno presents a surrealistic play inspired by translations of the poems by Yi Sang, a Korean poet who died in 1937. The production was heralded as a meaningful coming together of three experimental artists of different generations and backgrounds. From Korean American’s perspective, Lee examines the production in the context of Korean as well as transnational avant-garde theater, where Sung Rno creates a theatrical imagination of modern Korea through linguistic and visual poetry onstage.
KeywordsDiaspora Avant-Garde Colonialism Transnationalism Korea
- Kim, M. 2002. Crow’s Eye View: The Infamy of Lee Sang, Korean Poet. Washington, DC: The World Works.Google Scholar
- Kim, K. 2009. Wit and Paradox: Lee Breuer Directs Yi Sang Counts to Thirteen. Performance & Theory 34: 228–235.Google Scholar
- Klasfeld, A. 2001. Yi Sang Counts to 13 and Often I Find That I Am Naked. [online] Available at: http://www.theatermania.com/new-york-city-theater/reviews/08-2001/yi-sang-counts-to-13-and-often-i-find-that-i-am-na_1590.html. Accessed 31 May 2017.
- Lei, D. 2002. Sung Jung Rno. In Asian American Playwrights: A Bio-Bibliographical Critical Sourcebook, ed. M. Liu, 292–297. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
- Lew, W., trans. 1995. Portfolio: Yi Sang (1910–1937). Muae: A Journal of Transcultural Production 71: 74–149.Google Scholar
- Mabu Mimes. Lee Breuer. [online] Available at: http://www.maboumines.org/company/artistic-directors/lee-breuer-2/. Accessed 31 May 2017.
- Parreñas, R., and L. Siu, eds. 2007. Asian Diasporas: New Formations, New Conceptions. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Son, H. 2000. Interview with Playwright Sung Rno, Author of Yi Sang Counts to Thirteen. The Korean Theatre Review 292: 88–89.Google Scholar