Social Welfare and Harmony in East Asia and the Nordic Region

  • Johannes Dragsbaek Schmidt


According to the discourse of elites in East and Southeast Asia, public social policies are supposed to be supportive of a small public sector, free trade and the allocation of growth in the marketplace. This approach relies on a Weberian-type explanation emphasizing values such as hard work, discipline, private enterprise, family, thrift, responsibility and respect for authority. It is furthermore based on a deliberate strategy of not emphasizing any measures of a social welfare state or publicly sanctioned entitlements, as this is supposed to decrease competitiveness in global markets. This approach has recently been challenged by pressures from labor and other societal actors, which in tandem with increased democratization are pressuring the political agenda regarding provisions of welfare and social security. Old-style paternalism and the policy of growth at any cost are being questioned. It seems that one important outcome may create greater demands for public provision of social welfare as a more articulated political expression. An important prospect might be a “soft” restructuring of the present custodian developmental state towards a more redistributive public sector, with characteristics of a social welfare state.

The main purpose of this chapter is to provide a critical assessment of social policies and corporatism in East Asia (Japan, Korea, China and Taiwan) (excluding labor), and compare with the Scandinavian experience with corporatism (including labor). Are there lessons to be learned from successful models of social provisioning, with the ultimate objective of ensuring decent and secure lives for all citizens—particularly the poor, the excluded sectors in society and the unemployed? The East Asia model might offer lessons for the West and vice versa. Mutual learning must be the key for future understanding and co-operation.


  1. Anderson, Benedict (1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised Edition ed. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Arrighi, Giovanni (2007) Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Asher, M. and Amarendu Nandy (2008) Singapore’s policy responses to ageing, inequality and poverty: An assessment, International Social Security Review, Vol. 61, No. 1.Google Scholar
  4. Bienefeld, Manfred (1993) Financial Deregulation: Disarming the Nation State, Studies in Political Economy, 37, Spring.Google Scholar
  5. Carney, Terry (2010) The Future of Welfare Law in a Changing World: Lessons from Australia and Singapore, Sydney Law Review, Vol. 32: No. 193.Google Scholar
  6. Cerny, P. (1990) The Changing Architecture of Politics: Structure, Agency and the Future of the State. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Chang, K. (1997) The Neo-Confucian Right and family politics in Korea: the nuclear family as an ideological construct, Economy and Society, Vol. 26, No. 1.Google Scholar
  8. Danford, A., & Zhao, W. (2012). Confucian HRM or Unitarism with Chinese Characteristics? A Study of Worker Attitudes to Work Reform and Management in Three State-Owned Enterprises. Work, Employment and Society, 26(5). pp. 839–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deyo, Frederick (1989) Beneath the Miracle: Labour Subordination In East Asian Development, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Esping-Andersen, Gösta (ed.) (1996) Welfare States in Transition. National Adaptions in Global Economics, UNRISD and Sage, London.Google Scholar
  11. Frank, A.G. (1998) ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Galbraith, James K. (1997) Preface, New Political Economy, Vol. 2, No. 1.Google Scholar
  13. Green, A. et al. (2009) Regimes of Social Cohesion, Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies, LLAKES Research Paper 1.Google Scholar
  14. Ham, Peter van (2010) Social Power in International Politics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Holden, Chris (2003) Decommodification and the Workfare, State, Political Studies Review, Vol. 1, 303–316.Google Scholar
  16. Hoogvelt, Ankie (1997) Globalization and the Postcolonial World, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Jonasson, Charlotte and Jakob Lauring (2006) Rethinking the Harmonious Family: Processes of Social Organization in a Korean Corporation. Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 24 (2).Google Scholar
  18. Kim P.H. (2010) The East Asian Welfare State Debate and Surrogate Social Policy: An Exploratory Study on Japan and South Korea, Socio-Economic Review, Vol. 8, pp. 411–435.Google Scholar
  19. Koh, Tommy (1998) The Quest for World Order. Perspectives of a pragmatic realist, Singapore: Times Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Korpi, Walter (1980) Social Policy and Distributional Conflict in the Capitalist Democracies: A Preliminary Comparative Framework, West Euroepan Politics, Vol. 3.Google Scholar
  21. Kwon, Keedon (2007) Economic development in East Asia and a critique of the post-Confucian thesis, Theory and Society, Vol. 36.Google Scholar
  22. Mishra, R. (1999) Globalization and the Welfare State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  23. OECD (2011) Society at a Glance 2011 – OECD Social Indicators,
  24. Petersen, Kåre F.V. (1997) “The Danish Model under threat?” in EIROnline: European Industrial Relations Observatory On-line
  25. Park, C.-M. and Lee, S. G. (2007) Are Associations the Schools of Democracy across Asia? Asian Barometer Project Office National Taiwan University and Academia Sinica. Available at
  26. Pascall, Gillian and Sirin Sung (2007) Gender and East Asian Welfare States: from Confucianism to Gender Equality?, Paper for the Fourth Annual East Asian Social Policy research network (EASP) International Conference, 20th–21st October, 2007.Google Scholar
  27. Rodan, Garry (1995) Ideological Convergences Across East and West: The New Conservative Offensive, Development Research Series, Working Paper No. 41, Aalborg, Denmark: Research Center on Development and International Relations.Google Scholar
  28. Sander, A., Schmitt, C., & Kuhnle, S. (2010). Towards a Chinese Welfare State. Tagging the Concept of Social Security in China, The Perspective of the World Review, volume 4, no. 2, August.
  29. Schmidt, J.D. and Hersh J. (2012) The Danish Flexicurity Model in Distress: The Audacity of Austerity, paper for the Panel: “The Global Impact of the Financial Crisis: Social and Political Impacts”, XXII World Congress of Political Science, The International Political Science Association, 8–12 July, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  30. Schmidt, J.D. (2010) A Cacophony of Crises: Systemic Failure and Reasserting People’s Rights, Human Geography, Vol. 3, No. 1, Bolton, MA.Google Scholar
  31. Schmidt, J.D. (2008) ‘China’s Soft Power Diplomacy in Southeast Asia’, Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1.
  32. Schmidt, J.D. (2006) Flexicurity, Casualization and Informalization of Global Labour Markets. In: Globalization and the Third World: A Study of the Negative Consequences. ed. B.N.Ghosh; Halil M.Guven. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. p. 129–147.Google Scholar
  33. Schmidt, J.D. and Hersh J. (2000) Globalization or the Coming-of-age of Capitalism in Schmidt, J.D. and Hersh, J. (eds) Globalization and Social Change, London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Schmidt, J.D. (2000a) Neoliberal Globalization, Social Welfare and Trade Unionism in Southeast Asia, in B. Gills (ed.) Globalization and the Politics of Resistance, London: Macmillan & New York: St. Martins Press.Google Scholar
  35. Schmidt, J.D. (2000b) “Restructuring Social Welfare in East Southeast Asia : Corporatism with or Without Labour” paper for the International Conference of ASEM/World Bank/KSSA, November 30th – December 1st, 2000, Seoul, South Korea: Flexibility vs. Security? Social Policy and the Labour Market in Europe and East Asia.Google Scholar
  36. Shin, Chang-sik and Ian Shaw (2003) Social Policy in South Korea: Cultural and Structural Factors in the Emergence of Welfare, Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 37, No. 4, August.Google Scholar
  37. Unger, D. and Anita Chang (1995) China, Corporatism, and the East Asian Model, The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, No. 33, pp. 29–53.Google Scholar
  38. Wei He (2010) Study on Evaluation of harmonious labor relations of Chinese private enterprises, Paper for the 2010 Second International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Visualization Methods,,
  39. Weir, Margaret and Theda Skochpol (1983) State Structures and Social Keynesianism: Responses to the Great Depression in Sweden and the United States, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, Vol. 24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Dragsbaek Schmidt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations