Advertisement

The Effect of Knowledge Sharing Practices on Employees’ Knowledge and Capabilities in the Hotel Industry in Sri Lanka

  • Chathuri P. DanthanarayanaEmail author
  • P. H. T. Kumara
  • W. G. S. R. Wijesundara
  • J. Sutha
Conference paper
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

The hotel industry is a service-intensive industry in which human resources hold a major place. Employees’ knowledge and capabilities are considered the most critical factors in such an industry. Organizations face negative experiences such as costly information storage systems because employees are reluctant to share their skills, knowledge, and experiences with other employees. Knowledge sharing can be considered an ideal model for conducting operations effectively in hotels. Because of the importance given in the business world in relation to knowledge sharing, limited studies have been conducted in the context of the effect of knowledge sharing on employees’ knowledge and capabilities. Therefore, researchers have explored the gaps by arguing that knowledge sharing combined with employee motivation enables knowledge and capability within organizations. Thus, the study is based on four objectives: First, it aims to identify the existing level of knowledge sharing practices in the hotel industry. Second, the study explores the relationship among knowledge sharing, motivation, and employees’ knowledge and capabilities. Third, it reveals the impact of knowledge sharing on employees’ knowledge, capabilities, and training. Finally, it examines how motivational factors mediate the relationship between knowledge sharing and employees’ knowledge and capabilities. Survey data were collected from two hundred operational level employees from four- and five-star hotels in Colombo. The study used the survey method and measures adopted from past literature. Further, this study used the multistage sampling technique to collect primary data. Data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics, multiple regressions, the coefficient correlation, the Baron and Kenny mediator assessment and the Sobel test. The results of the study indicate that a positive relationship obtained between (1) knowledge sharing and (2) employees’ knowledge and capabilities. In addition, employee motivation was found to significantly and partially mediate the relationship between (1) knowledge sharing and (2) employees’ knowledge and capability (training and capability). The findings of the study suggest that top-level managers in the hotel industry can improve employees’ knowledge and capabilities by enhancing proper implementation of knowledge sharing practices through stimulating intrinsic and extrinsic motivations.

Keywords

Knowledge sharing Human resource practices Employees’ knowledge and capabilities Training Capability Employee motivation 

References

  1. Ajila, C., & Abiola, A. (2004). Influence of rewards on workers performance in an organization. Journal of Social Science, 8, 7.Google Scholar
  2. Argote, L., Mcevily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, R. A. (1983). Behavior in organizations (p. 123). New York: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Baron, R. N., & Kenny, D. K. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 153, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop, J. (1987). The recognition & reward of employee performance. Journal of Labor Economics, 5, S36–S56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouncken, R. (2002). Knowledge management for quality improvement in hotels. In Knowledge management in hospitality and tourism (pp. 25–59). New York: The Haworth Hospitality Press.Google Scholar
  7. Buttle, F. (1986). Hotel and food service marketing: A managerial approach. London: Cassell Educational Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Cabrera, A., Collins, W. C., & Salgado, J. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 515–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carraher, R., Gibson, A., & Carraher, R. (2006). Compensation in the Baltic and the USA. Baltic Journal of Management, 1, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, T. Y., Chang, P. L., & Yen, C. W. A. (2004). Study of career needs, career development programs, job satisfaction and the turnover intensity of R & D personnel. Career Development International, 9, 424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, Y., & Lou, H. (2002). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a groupware application. Journal of End User Computing, 14, 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiaburu, D. S., & Tekleab, A. G. (2005). Individual and contextual influences on multiple dimensions of training effectiveness. Journal of European Industrial Training, 29, 604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 544–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooper, C. (2006). Knowledge management and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 33, 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  17. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A Meta analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.Google Scholar
  18. De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gagné, M. (2009). A model of knowledge sharing motivation. Human Resource Management Review, 48, 571–589.Google Scholar
  20. Goldstein, I. L., & Gilliam, P. (1990). Training system issues in the year 2000. American Psychologist, 45, 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hansen, M. T., Mors, M. L., & Løvås, B. (2005). Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 776–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huber, G. P. (2001). Transfer of knowledge in knowledge management systems: Unexplored issues and suggested studies. European Journal of Information Systems, 10, 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Isabel, M. P. P., Santana, M. P. P., & Sierra, C. M. (2010). Managing knowledge through human resource practices: Empirical examination on the Spanish automotive industry. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 9.Google Scholar
  25. Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Han, K., Hong, Y., Kim, A., & Winkler, A. (2012). Clarifying the construct of human resource systems: Relating human resource management to employee performance. Human Resource Management Review, 22, 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Knapp, E. M. (1998). Knowledge management. Business and Economic Review, 44, 3.Google Scholar
  27. Lang, D. L. (1992). Organizational culture and commitment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 3, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lazarova, M., & Tarique, I. (2005). Knowledge transfer upon repatriation. Journal of World Business, 40, 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mooradian, T., Renzl, B., & Matzler, K. (2006). Who trusts? Personality, trust and knowledge sharing. Management Learning, 37(4), 523–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mottaz, C. J. (1985). The relative importance of intrinsic and extrinsic rewards as determinants of work satisfaction. The Sociological Quarterly, 26, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pinder, C. (1998). Work motivation in organizational behaviour (p. 11). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  33. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Assessing mediation in communication research (pp. 13–54). London: The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research.Google Scholar
  34. Quigley, N. R., Tesluk, P. E., Locke, E. A., & Bartol, K. M. (2007). A multilevel investigation of the motivational mechanisms underlying knowledge sharing and performance. Organization Science, 18, 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rowden, R. W., & Conine, C. T. J. (2005). The impact of workplace learning and job satisfaction in small US commercial banks. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tsai, P., Yen, C. Y., Huang, L., & Huang, I. (2007). A study on motivating employee’s learning commitment in the post-downsizing era: Job satisfaction perspective. Journal of World Business, 42, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chathuri P. Danthanarayana
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. H. T. Kumara
    • 1
  • W. G. S. R. Wijesundara
    • 1
  • J. Sutha
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Public AdministrationUva Wellassa UniversityBadullaSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations