Advertisement

Walking Dysfunction

  • Hyun-Yoon Ko
Chapter

Abstract

Spinal cord injury usually results in conditions that affect motor, sensory, and autonomic functions. In addition to the injuries associated with the musculoskeletal system, these primarily affect the mobility of the patient in the early stages of rehabilitation. During rehabilitation, improvements of motor and sensory deficits are important to maintain independence in activities of daily living such as ambulation. The ability to walk is the ultimate goal of rehabilitation for patients with spinal cord injuries. Ambulation in patients with spinal cord injury is influenced by the level of injury and the different levels of muscle paralysis, sensory impairment, the lack of trunk control, and spasticity. Depending on the level and completeness of the spinal cord injury, the motor function available is the main determinant of waking ability. Several other factors, including muscle tone, proprioception, endurance, age, range of motion, and additional impairments or comorbidities, are also important in determining options available for walking after spinal cord injury.

References

  1. Arazpour M, Bani MA, Mousavi ME, et al. Chapter 10. Orthoses for spinal cord injury patients. In: Fuller H, Gates M, editors. Recovery of motor function following spinal cord injury. London: IntechOpen; 2016. p. 259–76. http://www.intechopen.com/books/recovery-of-motor-function-following-spinal-cord-injury.Google Scholar
  2. Arazpour M, Chitsazan A, Hutchins SW, et al. Design and simulation of a new powered gait orthosis for paraplegic patients. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012;36(1):125–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernardi M, Canale I, Castellano V, et al. The efficiency of walking of paraplegic patients using a reciprocating gait orthosis. Paraplegia. 1995;3(7):409–15.Google Scholar
  4. Bernardi M, Macaluso A, Sproviero E, et al. Cost of walking and locomotor impairment. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1999;9(2):149–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ditunno PL, Ditunno JF Jr. Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II): scale revision. Spinal Cord. 2001;39(12):654–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Esquenazi A, Talaty M, Packel A, et al. The ReWalk powered exoskeleton to restore ambulatory function to individuals with thoracic-level motor-complete spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91(11):911–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Field-Fote EC, Fluet GG, Schafer SD, et al. The spinal cord injury functional ambulatory inventory (SCI-FAI). J Rehabil Med. 2001;33(4):177–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Giszter SF. Spinal cord injury: present and future therapeutic devices and prostheses. Neurotherapeutics. 2008;5(1):147–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hardin EC, Kobetic R, Triolo RJ. Ambulation and spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2013;24:355–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harvey L, Davis G, Smith M, et al. Energy expenditure during gait using the walkabout and isocentric reciprocal gait orthoses in persons with paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(8):945–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harvey LA, Smith MB, Davis GM, et al. Functional outcomes attained by T9-12 paraplegic patients with the walkabout and the isocentric reciprocal gait orthoses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(7):706–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hirokawa S, Grimm M, Solomonow M, et al. Energy consumption in paraplegic ambulation using the reciprocating gait orthosis and electric stimulation of the thigh muscles. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71(9):687–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hornby TG, Zemon DH, Campbell D. Robotic-assisted, body-weight-supported treadmill training in individuals following motor incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2005;85(1):52–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jaspers P, Peeraer L, Van Petegem W, et al. The use of an advanced reciprocating gait orthosis by paraplegic individuals: a follow-up study. Spinal Cord. 1997;35(9):585–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson W, Fatone S, Gard S. Walking mechanics of persons who use reciprocating gait orthoses. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(3):435–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Katz-Leurer M, Weber C, Smerling-Kerem J, et al. Prescribing the reciprocal gait orthosis for myelomeningocele children: a different approach and clinical outcome. Pediatr Rehabil. 2004;7(2):105–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kawashima N, Sone Y, Nakazawa K, et al. Energy expenditure during walking with weight-bearing control (WBC) orthosis in thoracic level of paraplegic patients. Spinal Cord. 2003;41(9):506–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor “recovery” and “compensation” mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(4):313–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Merati G, Sarchi P, Ferrarin M, et al. Paraplegic adaptation to assisted-walking: energy expenditure during wheelchair versus orthosis use. Spinal Cord. 2000;38(1):37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morawietz C, Moffat F. Effects of locomotor training after incomplete spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(11):2297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Motlock WM. Principles of orthotic management for child and adult paraplegia and clinical experience with the isocentric RGO. In: Proceeding of 7th world congress of the international society in prosthetic and orthotics, Chicago, 1992.Google Scholar
  22. Nene A, Hermens H, Zilvold G. Paraplegic locomotion: a review. Spinal Cord. 1996;34(9):507–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rossignol S, Dubuc R. Spinal pattern generation. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1994;4:894–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Swinnen E, Duerinck S, Baeyens JP, et al. Effectiveness of robot-assisted gait training in persons with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(6):520–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sykes L, Edwards J, Powell ES, et al. The reciprocating gait orthosis: long-term usage patterns. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(8):779–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wirz M, Colombo G, Dietz V. Long term effects of locomotor training in spinal humans. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71:93–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suggested Reading

  1. American Spinal Injury Association, editor. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. Revised 2011. Updated 2015 ed. Atlanta: American Spinal Injury Association; 2015.Google Scholar
  2. Bromley I. Tetraplegia and paraplegia: a guide for physiotherapists. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1976.Google Scholar
  3. Buchanan LE, Nawoczenski DA, editors. Spinal cord injury-concepts and management approaches. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1987.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell WW. DeJong’s the neurologic examination. 7th ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1992.Google Scholar
  5. Cardenas DD, Dalal K, editors. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2014.Google Scholar
  6. Cardenas DD, Hooton TM, editors. Medical complications in physical medicine and rehabilitation. New York: Demos Medical Publishing, LLC; 2015.Google Scholar
  7. Chhabra HS, editor. ISCoS textbook on comprehensive management of spinal cord injuries. New Delhi: Wolters Kluwer; 2015.Google Scholar
  8. Green D, editor. Medical management of long-term disability. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1996.Google Scholar
  9. Harrison P. Managing spinal injury: critical care. The international management of people with actual or suspected spinal cord injury in high dependency and intensive care unit. London: The Spinal Injury Association; 2000.Google Scholar
  10. Harvey L. Management of spinal cord injuries: a guide for physiotherapists. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2008.Google Scholar
  11. Jallo J, Vaccaro AR, editors. Neurotrauma and critical care of the spine. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme; 2018.Google Scholar
  12. Kennedy P. The Oxford handbook of rehabilitation psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Somers MF. Spinal cord injury. Functional rehabilitation. 3rd ed. New York: Pearson; 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyun-Yoon Ko
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Rehabilitation MedicineRehabilitation Hospital, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of MedicineYangsanSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations