Advertisement

Functional Outcomes and Mobility

  • Hyun-Yoon Ko
Chapter

Abstract

The functional goal of patients with spinal cord injuries may be influenced by various factors such as age and comorbidity, degree of spasticity, and sociopsychological factors but is largely determined by the neurological level of injury and severity of injury, particularly the state of motor function. Neurological function, particularly motor function, is the main determinant of overall functional outcomes after spinal cord injury. Additional factors such as age, pain, spasticity, comorbid conditions, body habits, and environmental and psychosocial factors can also affect function and play an important role in determining functional outcomes. It should be recognized that these outcomes reflect the level of independence that can be achieved under optimal conditions without considering other personal and environmental factors that can be applied to individual patients.

References

  1. Alexander MS, Anderson KD, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. Outcome measures in spinal cord injury: recent assessments and recommendations for future directions. Spinal Cord. 2009;47(8):582–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AlHuthaifi F, Krzak J, Hanke T, et al. Predictors of functional outcomes in adults with traumatic spinal cord injury following inpatient rehabilitation: a systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2017;40(3):282–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behrman AL, Harkema SJ. Physical rehabilitation as an agent for recovery after spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2007;18:183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Depression following spinal cord injury: clinical practice guideline for health care professionals. Washington, DC: Paralyzed Veterans of America; 1998a.Google Scholar
  5. Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Neurogenic bowel management in adults with spinal cord injury. Clinical practice guideline for health care professionals. Washington, DC: Paralyzed Veterans of America; 1998b.Google Scholar
  6. Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Preservation of upper limb function following spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health care professionals. J Spinal Cord Med. 2005;28(5):434–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gittler MS, McKinley WO, Stiens SA, et al. Spinal cord injury medicine. 3. Rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(3 Suppl 1):S65–71, S90-98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hachem LD, Ahuja CS, Fehlings MG. Assessment and management of acute spinal cord injury: From point of injury to rehabilitation. J Spinal Cord Med. 2017;40(6):665–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Horn SD, Smout RJ, DeJong G, et al. Association of various comorbidity measures with spinal cord injury rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(4 suppl):S75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hussey RW, Stauffer ES. Spinal cord injury: requirements for ambulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1973;54:544–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones ML, Harness E, Denison P, et al. Activity-based therapies in spinal cord injury: clinical focus and empirical evidence in three independent programs. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2012;18(1):34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Paralyzed Veterans of America. Outcomes following traumatic spinal cord injury. Clinical practice guidelines for health care professionals. Washington, DC: Paralyzed Veterans of America; 1999.Google Scholar
  13. Sabharwal S. Essentials of spinal cord medicine. Demos Medical, New York; 2014.Google Scholar

Suggested Reading

  1. Bromley I. Tetraplegia and paraplegia: a guide for physiotherapists. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1976.Google Scholar
  2. Buchanan LE, Nawoczenski DA, editors. Spinal cord injury-concepts and management approaches. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1987.Google Scholar
  3. Cardenas DD, Hooton TM, editors. Medical complications in physical medicine and rehabilitation. New York: Demos Medical Publishing, LLC; 2015.Google Scholar
  4. Green D, editor. Medical management of long-term disability. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1996.Google Scholar
  5. Harvey L. Management of spinal cord injuries: a guide for physiotherapists. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2008.Google Scholar
  6. Illis LS, editor. Spinal cord dysfunction: assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1988.Google Scholar
  7. Kennedy P, editor. The Oxford handbook of rehabilitation psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  8. Kirshblum S, Campagnolo DI, editors. Spinal cord medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2011.Google Scholar
  9. Somers MF. Spinal cord injury. Functional rehabilitation. 3rd ed. New York: Pearson; 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyun-Yoon Ko
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Rehabilitation MedicineRehabilitation Hospital, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of MedicineYangsanSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations