Advertisement

Conjunctiva and Cornea Exam

  • Jong-Soo LeeEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In most cases, an ophthalmic examination can be performed at the ocular surface, including cornea and conjunctiva. The cornea is arranged into well-organized layers, and each layer plays a significant role in maintaining the transparency and viability of the tissue. The conjunctiva is a thin, translucent membrane lining the anterior part of the sclera and inside of the eyelids. The inflammation of ocular surface can be divided into infectious and noninfectious causes, including allergic, and toxic, as well as immune-mediated diseases. Various ophthalmic examinations of this chapter provide assistance to the diagnosis of the ocular surface disease. In additional, culture or cytology from the ocular surface may provide further information to diagnose of disease or to guide therapy.

Suggested Reading

  1. Arita R, Suehiro J, Haraguchi T, et al. Topical diquafosol for patients with obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(6):725–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benson WH, Lanier JD. Comparison of techniques for culturing corneal ulcers. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:800–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourne WM, Kaufman HE. Specular microscopy of human corneal endothelium in vivo. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976;81(3):319–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavanagh HD, Shields W, Jester JV, et al. Confocal microscopy of the living eye. CLAO J. 1990;16:65–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dingeldein SA, Klyce SD. The topography of normal corneas. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feenstr RPG, Tseng SCG. Comparison of fluorescein and rose Bengal staining. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:605–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foulks GN, Bron AJ. Meibomian gland dysfunction: a clinical scheme for description, diagnosis, classification, and grading. Ocul Surf. 2003;1(3):107–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim J, Foulks GN. Evaluation of the effect of lissamine green and rose Bengal on human corneal epithelial cells. Cornea. 1999;18(3):328–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kitzmann AS, Winter EJ, Nau CB, et al. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell images from a noncontact specular microscope and a scanning confocal microscope. Cornea. 2005;24(8):980–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Klais CM, Buhren J, Kohnen T. Comparison of endothelial cell count using confocal and contact specular microscopy. Ophthalmologica. 2003;217:99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Langston DP, Foulk GN. Cornea and external disease. Boston: Little Brown; 1991.Google Scholar
  12. Maeda N, Klyce SD, Smolek MK, et al. Automated keratoconus screening with corneal topography analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:2749–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mannis MJ, Holland EJ. Cornea. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2005.Google Scholar
  14. Mathers WD, Daley T, Verdick R. Video imaging of the meibomian gland [letter]. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112(4):448–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mishima S. Corneal thickness. Surv Ophthalmol. 1968;13:57–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Nemoto Y, Arita R, Mizota A, et al. Differentiation between chalazion and sebaceous carcinoma by noninvasive meibography. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:1869–75.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Spencer W, Zimmerman L. Conjunctiva. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1985.Google Scholar
  18. Swartz T, Marten L, Wang M. Measuring the cornea: the latest developments in corneal topography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007;18:325–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wise RJ, Sobel RK, Allen RC. Meibography: a review of techniques and technologies. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2012;26(4):349–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyPusan National University School of MedicineBusanSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations