Advertisement

Ocular Alignment and Movement Exam

  • Hye-Shin Jeon
  • Jung-Yul Park
  • Hee-Young ChoiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The target is selected according to the purpose of the test. If it is necessary to test in accommodative environment, a small accommodating target should be used. And a large target or a light source may be used if the accommodation is to be eliminated. In the case of infants, a target that can induce the interest of the infant is used. Cover test can only be performed on patients who have enough visual acuity and concentration ability to look at the target. In addition, the results are inaccurate even when there is an abnormal retinal correspondence and extrafoveal fixation. The eye level of the examinee should be the same as the patient and be careful not to occlude the target by the examiner. Since the head position of the patient may affect the rest position, examination is required at the right head position.

Suggested Reading

  1. Archer SM, Sondhi N, Helveston EM. Strabismus in infancy. Ophthalmology. 1989;96(1):133–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahill AT, Brockenbrough A, Troost BT. Variability and development of a normative data base for saccadic eye movements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;21(1 PT 1):116–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beard C. Ptosis. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1981.Google Scholar
  4. Biedner BZ, Marcus M, Yassur Y, et al. Stereopsis testing: at the beginning or the end of the orthoptic examination. Binoc Vis Q. 1992;7:37–9.Google Scholar
  5. Bixenman WW, Von Noorden GK. Apparent foveal displacement in normal subjects and in cyclotropia. Ophthalmology. 1982;89:58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chung WS, Kim SY. Analysis of the causes of ptosis. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1995;36(10):1649–54.Google Scholar
  7. DeRespinis PA, Naidu E, Brodie SE. Calibration of Hirschberg test photographs under clinical conditions. Ophthalmology. 1989;96(7):944–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guyton DL. Exaggerated traction test for the oblique muscles. Ophthalmology. 1981;88(10):1035–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Helveston E, Bick SE, Ellis FD. Differential intraocular pressure as an indirect measure of generated muscle force. Ophthalmol Surg. 1980;11:386–91.Google Scholar
  10. Hess WR. I. Ein einfaches messendes Verfahren zur Motilitätsprüfung der Augen. Ophthalmologica Journal international d’ophtalmologie International Journal of Ophthalmology Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde. 1916;35:201–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hofmann FB, Bielschowsky A. Die Verwertung der KopfneigungzurDiagnoseder Augenmuskellmungen aus der Heber und Senkergruppe. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1900;51:174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lancaster WB. Terminology in ocular motility and allied subjects. Am J Ophthalmol. 1943;26:122–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lancaster WB. Refraction correlated with optics and physiological optics and motility limited to heterophoria. Springfield: Thomas; 1952.Google Scholar
  14. McCord CD, Tenenbaum M, Nunery WR. Oculoplastic surgery. 3rd ed. New York: Raven Press; 1995. p. 175–220.Google Scholar
  15. Mitchell PR, Wheeler MB, Parks MM. Kestenbaum surgical procedure for torticollis secondary to congenital nystagmus. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1987;24(2):87–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Noorden GKV. Burian-von noordenis binocular vision and ocular motility. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby; 1985.Google Scholar
  17. Paliaga GP. Linear strabismometric methods. Binoc Vis Q. 1992;7:134–54.Google Scholar
  18. Parls MM. Isolated cyclovertical muscle palsy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;24:162–5.Google Scholar
  19. Pensyl CD, Benjamin WJ. Chapter 10: Ocular motility. In: Benjamin WJ, editor. Borish’s clinical refraction. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Butterworth-Heinemann-Elsevier; 2006.Google Scholar
  20. Roper KL, Bannon RE. Diagnostic value of monocular occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol. 1944;31:316–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ruttum MS, Shimshak KJ, Chesner M. Photographic measurement of the angel of strabismus. In: Campos EC, editor. Strabismus and ocular motility disorders. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1990.Google Scholar
  22. Song WS, Lee SJ, Kim YH. Morphologic study of upper contour and functional evaluation of levator palpebrae superioris muscle in adult and young people. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2001;42(11):1523–9.Google Scholar
  23. Striph GG, Miller NR. Disorders of eyelid function caused by systemic disease. In: Bosniak S, editor. Principles and practice of ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1996. p. 72–93.Google Scholar
  24. Tongue AC, Cibis GW. Brückner test. Ophthalmology. 1981;88:1041–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. von Noorden GK, Campos EC. Binocular vision and ocular motility: theory and management of strabismus. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Inc; 2002. p. 168–210.Google Scholar
  26. Von Noorden G, Maumenee A. Atlas of strabismus. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1983.Google Scholar
  27. Worth CA, Chavasse FB. Worth’s squint, or, the binocular reflexes and the treatment of strabismus. London: Baillière, Tindall and Cox; 1939.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyPusan National University HospitalBusanSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of OphthalmologyPusan National University School of MedicineBusanSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations