Advertisement

Valve-In-Valve Therapy

  • Ming-Chon Hsiung
  • Wei-Hsian Yin
  • Fang-Chieh Lee
  • Wei-Hsuan Chiang
Chapter

Abstract

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation is feasible in failing bioprostheses and offers an alternative to reoperative surgical valve replacement for many high-risk patients.

Supplementary material

Video 2.1

(WMV 9028 kb)

Video 2.2a

(WMV 13379 kb)

Video 2.2b

(WMV 5473 kb)

Video 2.3a

(WMV 10161 kb)

Video 2.3b

(WMV 7934 kb)

Video 2.3c

(WMV 10208 kb)

Video 2.3d

(WMV 13145 kb)

Video 2.4a

(WMV 1825 kb)

Video 2.4b

(WMV 1481 kb)

Video 2.4c

(WMV 1340 kb)

Video 2.4d

(WMV 715 kb)

Video 2.5

(WMV 4551 kb)

Video 2.6

(WMV 1762 kb)

Video 2.7

(AVI 155741 kb)

Video 2.8

(AVI 34798 kb)

Video 2.9

(AVI 31031 kb)

Video 2.10

(AVI 50976 kb)

Video 2.11

(AVI 142487 kb)

Video 2.12

(AVI 74559 kb)

Video 2.13

(AVI 33141 kb)

Video 2.14

(AVI 95312 kb)

Video 2.15

(AVI 95297 kb)

Video 2.16

(AVI 95297 kb)

Video 2.17

(AVI 55407 kb)

Video 2.18

(AVI 22361 kb)

Video 2.19

(AVI 6853 kb)

Video 2.20

(AVI 6576 kb)

Video 2.21

(AVI 4182 kb)

Video 2.22

(AVI 6512 kb)

Video 2.23

(AVI 7049 kb)

Video 2.24a

(AVI 1321 kb)

Video 2.24b

(AVI 1335 kb)

Video 2.25a

(AVI 744 kb)

Video 2.25b

(AVI 3100 kb)

Video 2.27

(AVI 12847 kb)

Video 2.28

(AVI 1432 kb)

Video 2.29a

(AVI 11340 kb)

Video 2.29b

(AVI 13126 kb)

Video 2.29c

(AVI 8808 kb)

Video 2.29d

(AVI 3213 kb)

Video 2.30

(AVI 2558 kb)

Video 2.31a

(AVI 9486 kb)

Video 2.31b

(AVI 1233 kb)

Video 2.31c

(AVI 1801 kb)

Video 2.32

(AVI 1463 kb)

Video 2.33

(AVI 13276 kb)

Video 2.35a

(WMV 8247 kb)

Video 2.35b

(WMV 3809 kb)

Video 2.36

(WMV 911 kb)

Video 2.37

(WMV 1145 kb)

Video 2.38a

(WMV 8989 kb)

Video 2.38b

(WMV 2520 kb)

Video 2.39a

(WMV 2333 kb)

Video 2.39b

(WMV 1614 kb)

Video 2.39c

(WMV 1098 kb)

Video 2.40

(WMV 567 kb)

Video 2.41a

(WMV 5903 kb)

Video 2.41b

(WMV 1215 kb)

Video 2.42a

(WMV 864 kb)

Video 2.42b

(WMV 1262 kb)

Video 2.43

(WMV 833 kb)

Video 2.44

(WMV 567 kb)

Video 2.47a

(AVI 11277 kb)

Video 2.47b

(AVI 3152 kb)

Video 2.49

(AVI 1562 kb)

Video 2.50a

(AVI 2126 kb)

Video 2.50b

(AVI 1698 kb)

Video 2.51

(AVI 8045 kb)

Video 2.52a

(AVI 4147 kb)

Video 2.52b

(AVI 2041 kb)

Video 2.53

(AVI 965 kb)

Video 2.54a

(AVI 967 kb)

Video 2.54b

(AVI 1010 kb)

Video 2.55

(AVI 1252 kb)

Video 2.56

(AVI 135859 kb)

Video 2.57

(AVI 41423 kb)

Video 2.58

(AVI 29828 kb)

Video 2.59

(AVI 33247 kb)

Video 2.60a

(AVI 135859 kb)

Video 2.60b

(AVI 134203 kb)

Video 2.60c

(AVI 183906 kb)

Video 2.60d

(AVI 61308 kb)

Video 2.61

(AVI 37679 kb)

Video 2.62a

(AVI 28815 kb)

Video 2.62b

(AVI 53194 kb)

Video 2.62c

(AVI 44329 kb)

Video 2.62d

(AVI 31031 kb)

Video 2.63a

(AVI 53194 kb)

Video 2.63b

(AVI 31031 kb)

Video 2.64a

(AVI 46544 kb)

Video 2.64b

(AVI 46544 kb)

Suggested Readings

  1. 1.
    John W, David W, Jian Y, et al. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprosthetic heart valves. Circulation. 2010;121:1848–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anson C, Ronen G, Jian Y, et al. Transcatheter transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantations for a failed bioprosthesis: a case series. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:711–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ronen G, Anson C, Jian Y, et al. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed surgical bioprosthetic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    John C, John W. Structural heart disease interventions. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. Chap. 18–20.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fleur D, Dominique H, Francesco M, et al. Transcatheter valve-in-ring implantation after failure of surgical mitral repair. Eur J of Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2013;44:e8–e15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    John ML, Jason HR. Interventional procedures for adult structural heart disease. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2014. Chap. 13.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Danny D, John W, Sabine B, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves. JAMA. 2014;312(2):162–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manuel W, Konstantin A, Sems MT, et al. Pushing limits- further evolutions of transcatheter valve procedures in the mitral position, including valve-in-valve, valve-in-ring, and valve-in-native-ring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:210–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jean-Michel P, Maria DT, Rishi P, et al. Transcatheter valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring for treating aortic and mitral surgical prosthetic dysfunction. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;66:2019–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liam M, Robert G, Siobhan L, et al. First reported use of the repositionable Lotus valve system for a failing surgical aortic bioprosthesis. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(2):e19–20.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nicolas A, Aurelie V, Jean-François P, et al. Combined structural heart disease interventions to treat a failed bioprosthesis: the Janus procedure. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1968–9.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Andreas S, Thomas KJ, Elizabeth P, et al. Two-in-one using 3D: mitral paravalvular leakage closure with concomitant transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016. pii: S1053-0770(16)30379-2. (In Press).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Joanna C, Nana T, Anelechi CA, et al. Relation of mitral valve surgery volume to repair rate, durability, and survival. JACC: Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;69:2397–406.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ming-Chon Hsiung
    • 1
  • Wei-Hsian Yin
    • 1
  • Fang-Chieh Lee
    • 2
  • Wei-Hsuan Chiang
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of CardiologyCheng Hsin General HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Division of CardiologyCheng-Hsin General HospitalTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations