Advertisement

Boundary of Treaty Interpretation and the Possible Codification

  • Chang-fa LoEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Treaty interpretation is subject to certain theoretical and practical boundaries. This chapter discusses various approaches and schools of treaty interpretation to explain the theoretical boundary. It also explains the internal boundaries (i.e. the constraints imposed by the interpreted treaty) and the external boundaries (i.e. the constraints arising from certain external factors) for treaty interpretation.

References

  1. Allan J (2015) Chapter 6 The activist judges—vanity of vanities. In: Coutinho LP, La Torre M, Smith SD (eds) Judicial activism: an interdisciplinary approach to the American and European experiences. Springer, Switzerland, pp 71–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aust HP, Rodiles A, Staubach P (2014) Unity or uniformity? Domestic courts and treaty interpretation. Leiden J Int Law 27(1):75–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baofu P (2010) The future of post-human law—a preface to a new theory of necessity, contingency and justice. Cambridge Scholars, NewcastleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cho S (2006) The WTO appellate body strikes down the U.S. zeroing methodology used in antidumping investigations. ASIL Insights, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. Dernbach JC, Prokopchak M (2015) Recognition of environmental rights for Pennsylvania citizens: a tribute to chief justice castille. Duquesne Law Rev 53:335–369Google Scholar
  6. Fitzmaurice G (1955–1956) The law and procedure of the international court of justice, 1951–1954: points of substantive lawGoogle Scholar
  7. Gorbylev S (2013) The use of ICJ case law in investment treaty arbitration. Arbitration 79(4):349–356Google Scholar
  8. International Court of Justice (1952) ReportsGoogle Scholar
  9. International Judicial Monitor. Treaty Interpretation. http://www.judicialmonitor.org/archive_0906/generalprinciples.html. Accessed 8 Aug 2017
  10. Kmiec KD (2004) the origin and current meaning of “judicial activism”. Calif Law Rev 92:1441–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Legal Information Institute of Cornell University Law School. Stare Decisis. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/stare_decisis. Accessed 8 Aug 2017
  12. Tumonis V (2012) Judicial creativity an constraint of legal rules: dueling cannons of international law. Univ Miami Int Comp Law Rev 20:93–133Google Scholar
  13. United States, Negotiations on Improvements and Clarifications of the Dispute Settlement Understanding—Further Contribution of the United states on Improving Flexibility and Member Control in WTO Dispute Settlement, Addendum. https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/asset_upload_file777_10410.pdf. Accessed 8 Aug 2017
  14. USLegal. Jurisprudence Constante Law and Legal Definition. https://definitions.uslegal.com/j/jurisprudence-constante/. Accessed 8 Aug 2017
  15. World Trade Organization. Legal Effect of Panel and Appellate Body Reports and DSB Recommendations and Rulings. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/disp_settlement_cbt_e/c7s2p1_e.htm. Accessed 8 Aug 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Judicial YuanConstitutional CourtTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations