Advertisement

Some Other Supplementary Interpretation Principles and the Possible Codification

  • Chang-fa LoEmail author
Chapter
  • 436 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter further elaborates some other principles serving as supplementary means of interpretation. The principle of maximum effectiveness, the principle of in dubio mitius and some other Latin maxims are the commonly cited principles for treaty interpretation. But are only supplementary means and can only help confirm the meaning resulting from the application of Article 31 or determine the meaning of the interpreted term when the interpretation according to Article 31 could still leave the meaning ambiguous or obscure.

References

  1. Conrad CR (2011) Processes and production methods (PPMs) in WTO law: interfacing trade and social goals. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Crema L (2010) Disappearance and new sightings of restrictive interpretation(s). http://ejil.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/3/681.full. Accessed 21 Aug 2017
  3. Feichtner I (2012) The law and politics of waivers—stability and flexibility in public international law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Fellmeth AX, Horwitz M (2011) Guide to latin in international law. http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195369380.001.0001/acref-9780195369380-e-1303. Accessed 21 Aug 2017
  5. Fitzmaurice GG (1951) The law and procedure of the international court of justice: treaty interpretation and certain other treaty points. Br Yearb Int Law 28:1–28Google Scholar
  6. Holzapfel H, Werner G (2009) Interpreting exceptions in intellectual property law. In: Prinz zu Waldeck und Pyrmont W, Adelman MJ, Brauneis R, Drexl J, Nack R (eds) Patents and technological progress in a globalized world: Liber Amicorum Joseph Straus. Springer, Berlin, pp 99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Larouer CJ (2009) In the Name of Sovereignty? The Battle over in Dubio Mitius Inside and Outside the Courts. In: Paper presented at Cornell law school inter-University graduate student conference papers. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1050&context=lps_clacp. Accessed 21 Aug 2017
  8. Stern B (2006) DS 58: United States—import prohibition of certain Shrimp and Shrimp products. In: Stern B, Fabri HR (eds) The case-law of the WTO: 1998-2. Springer, Leiden, pp 64–105Google Scholar
  9. Treaty Interpretation. http://www.judicialmonitor.org/archive_0906/generalprinciples.html. Accessed 21 Aug 2017
  10. Van Damme I (2009) Treaty interpretation by the WTO appellate body. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Judicial YuanConstitutional CourtTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations