Advertisement

Background: Multiple Units in Oral Drug Delivery

  • Amit Kumar NayakEmail author
  • Md Saquib Hasnain
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)

Abstract

The broad range of effectual drug candidates available in the present day is one of the best triumphs of the drug discovery research (Ansari et al. in Elixir Pharm 47:8821–8827, 2012; Hirani et al. in Trop J Pharm Res 8:161–172, 2009; Nayak and Manna in J Pharm Educ Res 2:24–38, 2011).

References

  1. S.A. Agnihotri, S.S. Jawalkar, T.M. Aminabhavi, Controlled release of cephalexin through gellan gum beads: Effect of formulation parameters on entrapment efficiency, size, and drug release. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 63, 249–261 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. R. Al-Kassas, O.M.N. Al-Gohary, M.M. Al-Fadhel, Controlling of systemic absorption of gliclazide through incorporation into alginate beads. Int. J. Pharm. 341, 230–237 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. A.K. Anal, W.F. Stevens, Chitosan-alginate multilayer beads for controlled release of ampicillin. Int. J. Pharm. 290, 45–54 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. T. Ansari, M.S. Hasnain, N. Hoda, A.K. Nayak, Microencapsulation of pharmaceuticals by solvent evaporation technique: a review. Elixir. Pharm. 47, 8821–8827 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. A. Assifoui, O. Chambin, P. Cayot, Drug release from calcium and zinc pectinate beads: Impact of dissolution medium composition. Carbohydr. Polym. 85, 388–393 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. R.J. Babu, S. Sathigrahi, M.T. Kumar, J.K. Pandit, Formulation of controlled release gellan gum macro beads of amoxicillin. Curr. Drug Deliv. 7, 36–43 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. S. Beg, A.K. Nayak, K. Kohli, S.K. Swain, M.S. Hasnain, Antibacterial activity assessment of a time-dependent release bilayer matrix tablet containing amoxicillin trihydrate. Brazilian J. Pharm. Sci. 48, 265–272 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. H. Bera, S. Boddupalli, S. Nandikonda, S. Kumar, A.K. Nayak, Alginate gel-coated oil-entrapped alginate–tamarind gum–magnesium stearate buoyant beads of risperidone. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 78, 102–111 (2015a)Google Scholar
  9. H. Bera, S. Boddupalli, A.K. Nayak, Mucoadhesive-floating zinc-pectinate-sterculia gum interpenetrating polymer network beads encapsulating ziprasidone HCl. Carbohydr. Polym. 131, 108–118 (2015b)Google Scholar
  10. H. Bera, S.G. Kandukuri, A.K. Nayak, S. Boddupalli, Alginate-sterculia gum gel-coated oil-entrapped alginate beads for gastroretentive risperidone delivery. Carbohydr. Polym. 120, 74–84 (2015c)Google Scholar
  11. N. Biswas, R.K. Sahoo, Tapioca starch blended alginate mucoadhesive-floating beads for intragastric delivery of metoprolol tartrate. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 83, 61–70 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. S. Chakraborty, M. Khandai, A. Sharma, N. Khanam, C.N. Patra, S.C. Dinda, K.K. Sen, Preparation, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of algino-pectinate bioadhesive microspheres: an investigation of the effects of polymers using multiple comparison analysis. Acta Pharm. 60, 255–266 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. Y.N. Chein, Controlled- and modulated-release drug delivery systems, in Encyclopaedia of pharmaceutical technology, ed. J. Swarbrick, J.C. Baylan, Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, 1990), pp. 281–333Google Scholar
  14. J.T. Chung, Z. Zhang, Mechanical characterization of calcium pectinate hydrogel for controlled drug delivery. Chem. Ind. 57, 611–616 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. Y.N. Dai, P. Lin, J.P. Zhang, A.Q. Wang, Q. Wei, Swelling characteristics and drug delivery properties of nifedipine-loaded pH-sensitive alginate-chitosan hydrogel beads. J. Biomed. Mater Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater 86B, 493–500 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. N.G. Das, S.K. Das, Controlled-release of oral dosage forms. Formul Fill & Finish 10–16 (2003)Google Scholar
  17. M.K. Das, P.C. Senapati, Furosemide-loaded alginate microspheres prepared by ionic cross-linking technique: morphology and release characteristics. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 70, 77–84 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. S. Das, A. Chaudhury, K.-Y. Ng, Preparation and evaluation of zinc-pectin-chitosan composite particles for drug delivery to the colon: Role of chitosan in modifying in vitro and in vivo drug release. Int. J. Pharm. 406, 11–20 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. B. Das, S. Dutta, A.K. Nayak, U. Nanda, Zinc alginate-carboxymethyl cashew gum microbeads for prolonged drug release: development and optimization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 70, 505–515 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. B. Das, S.O. Sen, R. Maji, A.K. Nayak, K.K. Sen, Transferosomal gel for transdermal delivery of risperidone. J. Drug. Deliv. Sci. Technol. 38, 59–71 (2017)Google Scholar
  21. V.N. Deshmukh, D.M. Sakarkar, R.D. Wakade, Formulation and evaluation of controlled release alginate microspheres using locust bean gum. J. Pharm. Res. 2, 258–261 (2009a)Google Scholar
  22. V.N. Deshmukh, J.K. Jadhav, V.J. Masirkar, D.M. Sakarkar, Formulation, optimization and evaluation of controlled release alginate microspheres using synergy gum blends. Res. J. Pharm. Tech. 2, 324–327 (2009b)Google Scholar
  23. K.G.H. Desai, Preparation and characteristics of high-amylose corn starch/pectin blend microparticles: a technical note. AAPS PharmSciTech 6, article 30 (2005)Google Scholar
  24. I. El-Glibaly, Oral delayed-release system based on Zn-pectinate gel (ZPG) microparticles as an alternative carrier to calcium pectinate beads for colonic drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 232, 199–221 (2001)Google Scholar
  25. A.H. El-Kamel, O.M.N. Al-Gohary, E.A. Hosny, Alginate-diltiazem beads: optimization of formulation factors, in vitro and in vivo bioavailability. J. Microencapsul. 20, 211–225 (2003)Google Scholar
  26. E.M. Elmowafy, G.A.S. Awad, S. Mansour, A.E.-H.A. El-Shamy, Ionotropically emulsion gelled polysaccharide beads: Preparation, in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Carbohydr. Polym. 75, 135–142 (2009)Google Scholar
  27. D. Getsios, J.J. Caro, K.J. Ishak, W. El-Hadi, K. Payne, M. O’Connel, D. Albrecht, W. Feng, D. Dubois, Oxybutynin extended release and tolterodine immediate release: a health economic comparison. Clin. Drug. Invest. 24, 81–88 (2004)Google Scholar
  28. M.L. González-Rodríguez, M.A. Holgado, C. Sánchez-Lafuente, A.M. Rabasco, A. Fini, Alginate/chitosan particulate systems for sodium diclofenac release. Int. J. Pharm. 232, 225–234 (2002)Google Scholar
  29. P.R. Guru, H. Bera, M. Das, M.S. Hasnain, A.K. Nayak, Aceclofenac-loaded Plantago ovata F. husk mucilage-Zn+2-pectinate controlled-release matrices. Starch-Stärke 70, 1700136 (2018)Google Scholar
  30. P.R. Guru, A.K. Nayak, R.K. Sahu, Oil-entrapped sterculia gum-alginate buoyant systems of aceclofenac: development and in vitro evaluation. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerf. 104, 268–275 (2013)Google Scholar
  31. M.S. Hasnain, A.K. Nayak, Alginate-inorganic composite particles as sustained drug delivery matrices, in Applications of Nanocomposite materials in drug delivery, ed. A.A.M. Inamuddin, A. Mohammad (A volume in Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials, Elsevier Inc., 2018a), pp. 39–74Google Scholar
  32. M.S. Hasnain, A.K. Nayak, Chitosan as responsive polymer for drug delivery applications, in Stimuli responsive polymeric Nanocarriers for drug delivery applications, ed. A.S.H. Makhlouf, Abu-Thabit N.Y. (Volume 1, Types and Triggers, Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials, Elsevier Ltd., 2018b), pp. 581–605Google Scholar
  33. M.S. Hasnain, A.K. Nayak, Nanocomposites for improved orthopedic and bone tissue engineering applications, in Applications of Nanocomposite materials in orthopedics, ed. A.A.M. Inamuddin, A. Mohammad (A volume in Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials, Elsevier Inc., 2019), pp. 145–177Google Scholar
  34. M.S. Hasnain, A.K. Nayak, M. Singh, M. Tabish, M.T. Ansari, T.J. Ara, Alginate-based bipolymeric-nanobioceramic composite matrices for sustained drug release. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 83, 71–77 (2016)Google Scholar
  35. M.S. Hasnain, P. Rishishwar, S. Rishishwar, S. Ali, A.K. Nayak, Isolation and characterization of Linum usitatisimum polysaccharide to prepare mucoadhesive beads of diclofenac sodium. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 116, 162–172 (2018)Google Scholar
  36. J.J. Hirani, D.A. Rathod, K.R. Vadalia, Orally disintegrating tablets: a review. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 8, 161–172 (2009)Google Scholar
  37. S. Jana, N. Maji, A.K. Nayak, K.K. Sen, S.K. Basu, Development of chitosan-based nanoparticles through inter-polymeric complexation for oral drug delivery. Carbohydr. Polym. 98, 870–876 (2013a)Google Scholar
  38. S. Jana, A. Saha, A.K. Nayak, K.K. Sen, S.K. Basu, Aceclofenac-loaded chitosan-tamarind seed polysaccharide interpenetrating polymeric network microparticles. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerf. 105, 303–309 (2013b)Google Scholar
  39. S. Jana, S.A. Ali, A.K. Nayak, K.K. Sen, S.K. Basu, Development and optimization of topical gel containing aceclofenac-crospovidone solid dispersion by “Quality by Design” approach. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 92, 2095–2105 (2014)Google Scholar
  40. S. Jana, A. Gangopadhaya, B.B. Bhowmik, A.K. Nayak, A. Mukhrjee, Pharmacokinetic evaluation of testosterone-loaded nanocapsules in rats. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 72, 28–30 (2015a)Google Scholar
  41. S. Jana, A. Samanta, A.K. Nayak, K.K. Sen, S. Jana, Novel alginate hydrogel core–shell systems for combination delivery of ranitidine HCl and aceclofenac. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 74, 85–92 (2015b)Google Scholar
  42. A.K. Jha, A. Bhattacharya, Preparation and in vitro evaluation of sweet potato starch blended sodium alginate microbeads. Adv. Nat. Appl. Sci. 2, 122–128 (2008)Google Scholar
  43. R.R. Krishna, T.E.G.K. Murthy, Preparation and evaluation of mucoadhesive microcapsules of glipizide formulated with gum: In vitro and in vivo. Acta. Pharm. Sci. 52, 335–344 (2010)Google Scholar
  44. G.T. Kulkarni, K. Gowthamarajan, R.R. Dhobe, F. Yohanan, B. Suresh, Development of controlled release spheroids using natural polysaccharide as release modifier. Drug. Deliv. 12, 201–206 (2005)Google Scholar
  45. M.A. Longer, J.R. Robinson, Sustained-release drug delivery systems, in Remington’s pharmaceutical sciences, 18th edn., ed. by A.R. Gennaro (Mark Easton Publishing Company, New York, 1990), p. 1676Google Scholar
  46. J. Malakar, A.K. Nayak, Theophylline release behavior for hard gelatin capsules containing various hydrophilic polymers. J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 3, 10–16 (2012a)Google Scholar
  47. J. Malakar, A.K. Nayak, Formulation and statistical optimization of multiple-unit ibuprofen-loaded buoyant system using 23-factorial design. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 9, 1834–1846 (2012b)Google Scholar
  48. J. Malakar, A.K. Nayak, Floating bioadhesive matrix tablets of ondansetron HCl: optimization of hydrophilic polymer-blends. Asian J. Pharm. 7, 174–183 (2013)Google Scholar
  49. J. Malakar, P.K. Datta, S. Dey, A. Gangopadhyay, A.K. Nayak, Proniosomes: a preferable carrier for drug delivery system. Elixir. Pharm. 40, 5120–5124 (2011)Google Scholar
  50. J. Malakar, A. Gangopadhyay, A.K. Nayak, Transferosome: an opportunistic carrier for transdermal drug delivery system. Int. Res. J. Pharm. 3, 35–38 (2012a)Google Scholar
  51. J. Malakar, A. Ghosh, A. Basu, A.K. Nayak, Nanotechnology: a promising carrier for intracellular drug delivery system. Int. Res. J. Pharm. 3, 36–40 (2012b)Google Scholar
  52. J. Malakar, S.O. Sen, A.K. Nayak, K.K. Sen, Formulation, optimization and evaluation of transferosomal gel for transdermal insulin delivery. Saudi. Pharm. J. 20, 355–363 (2012c)Google Scholar
  53. J. Malakar, A.K. Nayak, D. Pal, Development of cloxacillin loaded multiple-unit alginate-based floating system by emulsion–gelation method. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 50, 138–147 (2012d)Google Scholar
  54. J. Malakar, A.K. Nayak, A. Das, Modified starch (cationized)-alginate beads containing aceclofenac: formulation optimization using central composite design. Starch-Stärke. 65, 603–612 (2013a)Google Scholar
  55. J. Malakar, A.K. Nayak, P. Jana, D. Pal, Potato starch-blended alginate beads for prolonged release of tolbutamide: development by statistical optimization and in vitro characterization. Asian J. Pharm. 7, 43–51 (2013b)Google Scholar
  56. J. Malakar, A. Basu, A.K. Nayak, Candesartan cilexetil microemulsions for transdermal delivery: Formulation, in-vitro skin permeation and stability assessment. Curr. Drug Deliv. 11, 313–321 (2014a)Google Scholar
  57. J. Malakar, P. Dutta, S.D. Purokayastha, S. Dey, A.K. Nayak, Floating capsules containing alginate-based beads of salbutamol sulfate: in vitro-in vivo evaluations. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 64, 181–189 (2014b)Google Scholar
  58. J. Malakar, K. Das, A.K. Nayak, In situ cross-linked matrix tablets for sustained salbutamol sulfate release - formulation development by statistical optimization. Polym. Med. 44, 221–230 (2014c)Google Scholar
  59. D.P. Maurya, Y. Sultana, M. Aquil, D. Kumar, K. Chuttani, A. Ali, A.K. Mishra, Formulation and optimization of alkaline extracted ispaghula husk microparticles of isoniazid – in vitro and in vivo assessment. J. Microencapsul. 28, 472–482 (2011)Google Scholar
  60. X. Meng, P. Li, Q. Wei, H.-X. Zhang, pH sensitive alginate-chitosan hydrogel beads for carvedilol delivery. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 16, 22–28 (2011)Google Scholar
  61. N. Mennini, S. Furlanetto, F. Maestrelli, S. Pinzauti, P. Mura, Response surface methodology in the optimization of chitosan-Ca pectinate bead formulations. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 35, 318–325 (2008)Google Scholar
  62. M.M. Morshad, J. Mallick, A.K. Nath, M.Z. Uddin, M. Dutta, M.A. Hossain, M.H. Kawsar, Effect of barium chloride as a cross-linking agent on the sodium alginate based diclofenac sodium beads. Bangladesh. Pharm. J. 15, 53–57 (2012)Google Scholar
  63. J. Malakar, S.O. Sen, A.K. Nayak, K.K. Sen, Development and evaluation of microemulsion for transdermal delivery of insulin. ISRN Pharm 2011, Article ID 780150 (2011)Google Scholar
  64. R.H. Muller, C. Jacobs, O. Kayser, Nanosuspensions as particulate drug formulation therapy: rational for development and what we can expect for the future. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 47, 3–19 (2001)Google Scholar
  65. R. Maji, B. Das, A.K. Nayak, S. Ray, Ethyl cellulose microparticles containing metformin HCl by emulsification-solvent evaporation technique: effect of formulation variables. ISRN Polym Sci 2012, Article ID 801827 (2012)Google Scholar
  66. M. Narkar, P. Sher, A. Pawar, Stomach-specific controlled release gellan beads of acid-soluble drug prepared by ionotropic gelation method. AAPS PharmSciTech. 11, 267–277 (2010)Google Scholar
  67. A.K. Nayak, Advances in therapeutic protein production and delivery. Int. J. Pharm. Pharmaceut. Sci. 2, 1–5 (2010)Google Scholar
  68. A.K. Nayak, Controlled release drug delivery systems. Sci. J. UBU 2, 1–8 (2011)Google Scholar
  69. A.K. Nayak, S. Jana, A solid self-emulsifying system for dissolution enhancement of etoricoxib. J. PharmSciTech. 2, 87–90 (2013)Google Scholar
  70. A.K. Nayak, J. Malakar, Formulation and in vitro evaluation of gastroretentive hydrodynamically balanced system for ciprofloxacin HCl. J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 1, 65–68 (2010)Google Scholar
  71. A.K. Nayak, J. Malakar, Formulation and in vitro evaluation of hydrodynamically balanced system for theophylline delivery. J. Basic Clin. Pharm. 2, 133–137 (2011)Google Scholar
  72. A.K. Nayak, K. Manna, Current developments in orally disintegrating tablet technology. J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2, 24–38 (2011)Google Scholar
  73. A.K. Nayak, D. Pal, Development of pH-sensitive tamarind seed polysaccharide-alginate composite beads for controlled diclofenac sodium delivery using response surface methodology. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 49, 784–793 (2011)Google Scholar
  74. A.K. Nayak, D. Pal, Blends of jackfruit seed starch-pectin in the development of mucoadhesive beads containing metformin HCl. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 62, 137–145 (2013a)Google Scholar
  75. A.K. Nayak, D. Pal, Ionotropically-gelled mucoadhesive beads for oral metformin HCl delivery: formulation, optimization and antidiabetic evaluation. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 72, 15–22 (2013b)Google Scholar
  76. A.K. Nayak, D. Pal, Formulation optimization of jackfruit seed starch-alginate mucoadhesive beads of metformin HCl. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 59, 264–272 (2013c)Google Scholar
  77. A.K. Nayak, D. Pal, Chitosan-based interpenetrating polymeric network systems for sustained drug release, in Advanced theranostics materials, ed. by A. Tiwari, H.K. Patra, J.-W. Choi (WILEY-Scrivener, USA, 2015), pp. 183–208Google Scholar
  78. A.K. Nayak, D. Pal, Sterculia gum-based hydrogels for drug delivery applications, in Polymeric Hydrogels as smart Biomaterials, ed. by S. Kalia (Springer Series on Polymer and Composite Materials, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2016), pp. 105–151Google Scholar
  79. A.K. Nayak, K.K. Sen, Hydroxyapatite-ciprofloxacin implantable minipellets for bone delivery: Preparation, characterization, in vitro drug adsorption and dissolution studies. Int. J. Drug. Dev. Res. 1, 47–59 (2009)Google Scholar
  80. A.K. Nayak, A. Bhattacharya, K.K. Sen, Hydroxyapatite-antibiotic implantable minipellets for bacterial bone infections using precipitation technique: Preparation, characterization and in-vitro antibiotic release studies. J. Pharm. Res. 3, 53–59 (2010a)Google Scholar
  81. A.K. Nayak, B. Mohanty, K.K. Sen, Comparative evaluation of in vitro diclofenac sodium permeability across excised mouse skin from different common pharmaceutical vehicles. Int. J. PharmTech Res. 2, 920–930 (2010b)Google Scholar
  82. A.K. Nayak, R. Maji, B. Das, Gastroretentive drug delivery systems: a review. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 3, 2–10 (2010c)Google Scholar
  83. A.K. Nayak, J. Malakar, K.K. Sen, Gastroretentive drug delivery technologies: current approaches and future potential. J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 1, 1–12 (2010d)Google Scholar
  84. A.K. Nayak, A. Bhattacharyya, K.K. Sen, In vivo ciprofloxacin release from hydroxyapatite-ciprofloxacin bone-implants in rabbit tibia. ISRN Orthop 2011, Article ID 420549 (2011a)Google Scholar
  85. A.K. Nayak, B. Laha, K.K. Sen, Development of hydroxyapatite-ciprofloxacin bone-implants using “Quality by Design”. Acta Pharm. 61, 25–36 (2011b)Google Scholar
  86. A.K. Nayak, S. Khatua, M.S. Hasnain, K.K. Sen, Development of alginate-PVP K 30 microbeads for controlled diclofenac sodium delivery using central composite design. DARU J. Pharm. Sci. 19, 356–366 (2011c)Google Scholar
  87. A.K. Nayak, B. Das, R. Maji, Calcium alginate/gum Arabic beads containing glibenclamide: Development and in vitro characterization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 51, 1070–1078 (2012)Google Scholar
  88. A.K. Nayak, M.S. Hasnain, J. Malakar, Development and optimization of hydroxyapatite-ofloxacin implants for possible bone-implantable delivery in osteomyelitis treatment. Curr. Drug Deliv. 10, 241–250 (2013a)Google Scholar
  89. A.K. Nayak, B. Das, R. Maji, Gastroretentive hydrodynamically balanced system of ofloxacin: formulation and in vitro evaluation. Saudi. Pharm. J. 21, 113–117 (2013b)Google Scholar
  90. A.K. Nayak, S. Kalia, M.S. Hasnain, Optimization of aceclofenac-loaded pectinate-poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) beads by response surface methodology. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 62, 194–202 (2013c)Google Scholar
  91. A.K. Nayak, D. Pal, J. Malakar, Development, optimization and evaluation of emulsion-gelled floating beads using natural polysaccharide-blend for controlled drug release. Polym. Eng. Sci. 53, 338–350 (2013e)Google Scholar
  92. A.K. Nayak, D. Pal, J. Pradhan, M.S. Hasnain, Fenugreek seed mucilage-alginate mucoadhesive beads of metformin HCl: design, optimization and evaluation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 54, 144–154 (2013f)Google Scholar
  93. A.K. Nayak, D. Pal, K. Santra, Tamarind seed polysaccharide-gellan mucoadhesive beads for controlled release of metformin HCl. Carbohydr. Polym. 103, 154–163 (2014a)Google Scholar
  94. A.K. Nayak, D. Pal, K. Santra, Development of pectinate-ispagula mucilage mucoadhesive beads of metformin HCl by central composite design. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 66, 203–221 (2014b)Google Scholar
  95. A.K. Nayak, D. Pal, K. Santra, Ispaghula mucilage-gellan mucoadhesive beads of metformin HCl: development by response surface methodology. Carbohydr. Polym. 107, 41–50 (2014c)Google Scholar
  96. A.K. Nayak, D. Pal, K. Santra, Artocarpus heterophyllus L. seed starch-blended gellan gum mucoadhesive beads of metformin HCl. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 65, 329–339 (2014d)Google Scholar
  97. A.K. Nayak, D. Pal, K. Santra, Swelling and drug release behavior of metformin HCl-loaded tamarind seed polysaccharide-alginate beads. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 82, 1023–1027 (2016)Google Scholar
  98. A.K. Nayak, D. Pal, K. Santra, Development of calcium pectinate-tamarind seed polysaccharide mucoadhesive beads containing metformin HCl. Carbohydr. Polym. 101, 220–230 (2014a)Google Scholar
  99. A.K. Nayak, D. Pal, K. Santra, Plantago ovata F. Mucilage-alginate mucoadhesive beads for controlled release of glibenclamide: development, optimization, and in vitro-in vivo evaluation. J. Pharm. 2013, Article ID 151035 (2013g)Google Scholar
  100. A.K. Nayak, D. Pal, Natural starches-blended ionotropically-gelled micrparticles/beads for sustained drug release, in Handbook of composites from renewable materials, ed. V.K. Thakur, M.K. Thakur, M.R. Kessler (Volume 8, Nanocomposites: Advanced Applications, Wiley-Scrivener, USA 2017), pp. 527–560Google Scholar
  101. A.K. Nayak, K.K. Sen, Bone-targeted drug delivery systems, in Bio-Targets & Drug Delivery Approaches, ed. S. Maiti, K.K. Sen (CRC Press, 2016), pp. 207–231Google Scholar
  102. A.K. Nayak, A.A. Syed, S. Beg, T.J. Ara, M.S. Hasnain, Drug delivery: present, past and future of medicine, in Applications of Nanocomposite materials in drug delivery, ed. A.A.M. Inamuddin, A. Mohammad (A volume in Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials, Elsevier Inc., 2018a) 255–282Google Scholar
  103. A.K. Nayak, S. Beg, M.S. Hasnain, J. Malakar, D. Pal, Soluble starch-blended Ca2+-Zn2+-alginate composites-based microparticles of aceclofenac: formulation development and in vitro characterization. Future J. Pharm. Sci. 4, 63–70 (2018b)Google Scholar
  104. A.K. Nayak, B. Das, Introduction to polymeric gels, in Polymeric gels characterization, properties and biomedical applications, ed. K. Pal, I. Bannerjee (A volume in Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials, Elsevier Ltd., 2018c), pp. 3–27Google Scholar
  105. A.K. Nayak, T.J. Ara, M.S. Hasnain, N. Hoda, Okra gum-alginate composites for controlled releasing drug delivery, in Applications of Nanocomposite materials in drug delivery, ed. A.A.M. Inamuddin, A. Mohammad (A volume in Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials, Elsevier Inc., 2018d), pp. 761–785Google Scholar
  106. A.K. Nayak, M.S. Hasnain, D. Pal, Gelled microparticles/beads of sterculia gum and tamarind gum for sustained drug release, in Handbook of springer on polymeric gel, ed. V.K. Thakur, M.K. Thakur (Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2018e), pp. 361–414Google Scholar
  107. D. Pal, A.K. Nayak, Alginates, blends and microspheres: controlled drug delivery, in Encyclopedia of biomedical polymers and polymeric biomaterials, ed. M. Mishra (Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY 10017, U.S.A., Vol. I, 2015a), pp. 89–98Google Scholar
  108. D. Pal, A.K. Nayak, Interpenetrating polymer networks (IPNs): Natural polymeric blends for drug delivery, in Encyclopedia of biomedical polymers and polymeric biomaterials, ed. M. Mishra (Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY 10017, U.S.A., Vol. VI, 2015b), pp. 4120–4130Google Scholar
  109. Y.L. Patel, P. Sher, A.P. Pawar, The effect of drug concentration and curing time on processing and properties of calcium alginate beads containing metronidazole by response surface methodology. AAPS PharmSciTech 7, Article 86 (2006)Google Scholar
  110. D. Pal, A.K. Nayak, Plant polysaccharides-blended ionotropically-gelled alginate multiple-unit systems for sustained drug release, in Handbook of composites from renewable materials, ed. V.K. Thakur, M.K. Thakur, M.R. Kessler (Volume 6, Polymeric Composites, WILEY-Scrivener, USA, 2017), pp. 399–400Google Scholar
  111. D. Pal, A.K. Nayak, Development, optimization and anti-diabetic activity of gliclazide-loaded alginate-methyl cellulose mucoadhesive microcapsules. AAPS PharmSciTech. 12, 1431–1441 (2011)Google Scholar
  112. D. Pal, A.K. Nayak, Novel tamarind seed polysaccharide-alginate mucoadhesive microspheres for oral gliclazide delivery. Drug. Deliv. 19, 123–131 (2012)Google Scholar
  113. D. Pal, A.K. Nayak, S. Saha, Interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels of chitosan: applications in controlling drug release, in Cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels, polymers and polymeric composites: a reference series, ed. by I.H. Mondal (Springer, Cham, 2018), pp. 1–41Google Scholar
  114. G. Pasparakis, N. Bouropoulos, Swelling studies and in vitro release of verapamil from calcium alginate-chitosan beads. Int. J. Pharm. 323, 34–42 (2006)Google Scholar
  115. P. Patil, D. Chavanke, M. Wagh, A review on ionotropic gelation method: Novel approach for controlled gastroretentive gelispheres. Int. J. Pharm. Pharmaceut. Sci. 4, 27–32 (2012)Google Scholar
  116. H. Pawar, D. Douroumis, J.S. Boateng, Preparation and optimization of PMMA-chitosan-PEG nanoparticles for oral drug delivery. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerf. 90, 102–108 (2012)Google Scholar
  117. T. Pongjayakul, S. Puttipipatkhachorn, Xanthan-alginate composite gel beads: molecular interaction and in vivo characterization. Int. J. Pharm. 331, 61–71 (2007)Google Scholar
  118. V.U. Rao, M. Vasudha, K. Bindu, S. Samanta, P.S. Rajinikanth, B. Mishra, J. Balasubhramaniam, Formulation and in vitro characterization of sodium alginate-gellan beads of glipizide. Acta Pharm. Sin. 49, 13–28 (2007)Google Scholar
  119. S.N. Rath Adhikari, B.S. Nayak, A.K. Nayak, B. Mohanty, Formulation and evaluation of buccal patches for delivery of atenolol. AAPS PharmSciTech 11, 1034–1044 (2010)Google Scholar
  120. S. Ray, P. Sinha, B. Laha, S. Maiti, U.K. Bhattacharyya, A.K. Nayak, Polysorbate 80 coated crosslinked chitosan nanoparticles of ropinirole hydrochloride for brain targeting. J. Drug. Deliv. Sci. Technol. 48, 21–29 (2018)Google Scholar
  121. N.K. Sachan, A. Bhattyacharya, Evaluation of Assam Bora rice starch as a possible natural mucoadhesive polymer in the formulation of microparticulate controlled drug delivery systems. J. Assam. Sci. Soc. 47, 34–41 (2006)Google Scholar
  122. N.K. Sachan, A. Bhattyacharya, Feasibility of Assam bora rice based matrix microdevices for controlled release of water insoluble drug. Int. J. Pharm. Pharmaceut. Sci. 1, 96–102 (2009)Google Scholar
  123. V.K. Sharma, A. Bhattacharya, Release of metformin hydrochloride from ispaghula-sodium alginate beads adhered on cock intestinal mucosa. Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 42, 365–372 (2008)Google Scholar
  124. H.K. Sharma, B. Sarangi, S.P. Pradhan, Preparation and in vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive microbeads containing timolol maleate using mucoadhesive substances of Dellinia india L. Arch. Pharm. Res. 1, 181–18 (2009)Google Scholar
  125. J. Siepmann, F. Siepmann, The modified-release drug delivery landscape: academic viewpoint, in Modified release drug delivery technology, 2nd edn., ed. by M.J. Rathbone, J. Hadgraft, M.S. Roberts, M.E. Lane (Informa Healthcare Inc., USA, New York, 2008), pp. 17–34Google Scholar
  126. B. Singh, V. Sharma, D. Chauhan, Gastroretentive floating sterculia-alginate beads for use in antiulcer drug delivery. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 88, 997–1012 (2010)Google Scholar
  127. P. Sinha, U. Ubaidulla, M.S. Hasnain, A.K. Nayak, B. Rama, Alginate-okra gum blend beads of diclofenac sodium from aqueous template using ZnSO4 as a cross-linker. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 79, 555–563 (2015)Google Scholar
  128. P. Smrdel, M. Bogataj, A. Mrhar, The influence of selected parameters on the size and shape of alginate beads prepared by ionotropic gelation. Sci. Pharm. 76, 77–89 (2008)Google Scholar
  129. G.A. Soares, A.D. de Castro, B.S.F. Cury, R.C. Evangelista, Blends of cross-linked high amylase starch/pectin loaded with diclofenac. Carbohydr. Polym. 91, 135–142 (2013)Google Scholar
  130. P. Sriamornsak, J. Nunthanid, K. Cheewatanakornkool, S. Manchun, Effect of drug loading method on drug content and drug release from calcium pectinate gel beads. AAPS PharmSciTech. 11, 1315–1319 (2010)Google Scholar
  131. A. Srinatha, J.K. Pandit, S. Singh, Ionic cross-linked chitosan beads for extended release of ciprofloxacin: in vitro characterization. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 70, 16–21 (2008)Google Scholar
  132. R. Tiwari, G. Tiwari, A.K. Rai, Controlled drug delivery. Indian Pharmacist 8, 29–34 (2009)Google Scholar
  133. M.L. Torre, P. Giunchedi, L. Maggi, R. Stefli, E.O. Mechiste, U. Conte, Formulation and characterization of calcium alginate beads containing ampicillin. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 3, 193–198 (1998)Google Scholar
  134. J. Varshosaz, N. Tavakoli, M. Minayian, N. Rahdri, Applying the Taguchi design for optimized formulation of sustained release gliclazide chitosan beads. An in vitro/in vivo study. AAPS PharmSciTech. 10, 158–165 (2009)Google Scholar
  135. M.V.S. Verma, A.M. Kaushal, A. Garg, S. Garg, Factors affecting mechanism and kinetics of drug release from matrix-based oral controlled drug delivery systems. Am. J. Drug. Deliv. 2, 43–57 (2004)Google Scholar
  136. A. Verma, J. Dubey, N. Verma, A.K. Nayak, Chitosan-hydroxypropyl methylcellulose matrices as carriers for hydrodynamically balanced capsules of moxifloxacin HCl. Curr. Drug Deliv. 14, 83–90 (2017)Google Scholar
  137. S.P. Vyas, R.K. Khar, Essentials of controlled drug delivery, in Controlled drug delivery. Concepts and advances (1st edn, Delhi, India, Vallabh Prakashan, 2006), pp. 1–53Google Scholar
  138. S. Wittaya-areekul, J. Kruenate, C. Prahsarn, Preparation and in vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of alginate/chitosan microparticles containing prednisolone. Int. J. Pharm. 312, 113–118 (2006)Google Scholar
  139. B.A. Yegin, B. Moulari, N.T. Durlu-Kandilci, P. Korkusuz, Y. Pellequer, A. Lamprecht, Sulindac loaded alginate beads for a mucoprotective and controlled drug release. J. Microencapsul. 24, 371–382 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PharmaceuticsSeemanta Institute of Pharmaceutical SciencesMayurbhanjIndia
  2. 2.Department of PharmacyShri Venkateshwara UniversityAmrohaIndia

Personalised recommendations