Advertisement

The Relationship Between Self-efficacy (Online Version) and 3 m Golf Putting Distance: A Pilot Study

  • Mazlan Ismail
Conference paper

Abstract

The aim of this pilot study is to determine the relationship between self-efficacy and putting performance of the golfers. Hundred and twenty-two male golfers participated in this study in three different selected golf clubs. The online version of golf putting self-efficacy was developed in this study based on the written version created by the previous study. The 3 m distance was used as a measure in this study. To achieve the objective of this study, the golfers were required to rate their belief right before the putting test. The results showed no significant relationship between self-efficacy and putting performance from the 3 m distance. Contrary to the previous research where golfers perceived shorter distance is the hardest to perform psychologically. Future research should compare between short- and long-distance putting, if there is any association between distance and self-efficacy of the golfers.

Keywords

E-putting self-efficacy 3 m distance Golf putting 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Healthy Generation Malaysia, the golf clubs involved, the coaches and players for the support and cooperation in completing this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Ismail, M., & Ramlee, W. (2016). The relationship between self-efficacy and 6 feet golf putting distance. In S. I. Ismail et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Colloquium on Sports Science, Exercise, Engineering and Technology 2015 (Icosseet 2015) (pp. 247–252). Singapore: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978981287691126.
  2. 2.
    Cooke, A., Kavussanu, M., McIntyre, D., & Ring, C. (2010). Psychological, muscular, and kinematic factors mediate performance under pressure. Psychophysiology, 47, 1109–1118.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.2010.01021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hayslip, B., Petrie, T. A., MacIntire, M. M., & Jones, G. M. (2010). The influences of skill level, anxiety, and psychological skills use on amateur golfers’ performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 22, 123–133.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200903554281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roberts, R., & Turnbull, O. H. (2010). Putts that get missed on the right: In vestigating lateralized attentional biases and the nature of putting errors in golf. Journal of Sport Science, 28, 369–374.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410903536467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hung, G. K. (2003). Effect of putting grip on eye and head movements during the golf putting stroke. The Scientific World Journal, 3, 122–137.  https://doi.org/10.1100/2003.14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clark, R. D. I. I. I. (2004). Streakiness among professional golfers: Fact or fiction? International Journal Sport Psychology, 34, 63–79.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ismail, M. (2014). Golf putting: Shorter putts are easier, is this really true. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Educational Development, 2, 22–27.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feltz, D. L., Short, S. E., & Sullivan, P. J. (2008). Self-efficacy in sport; research and strategies for working with athletes, teams, and coaches. United States: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bandura, A. (Ed.). (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ismail, M. (2014). Practice in mind: Help to improve golf putting from the hardest distance. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Educational Development, 2, 7–12.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith, D., Wright, C. J., & Cantwell, C. (2008). Beating the bunker: The effect of PETTLEP imagery on golf bunker shot performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 385–391.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith, D., & Holmes, P. (2004). The effect of imagery modality on golf putting performance. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moritz, S. E., Feltz, D. L., Fahrbach, K. R., & Mack, D. E. (2000). The relation of self-efficacy measures to sport performance: A meta analytic review. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 280–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cumming, J., Nordin, S. M., Horton, R., & Reynolds, S. (2006). Examining the direction of imagery and self talk on dart—Throwing performance and self-efficacy. The Sport Psychologist, 20, 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nordin, S. M., & Cumming, J. (2005). Professional dancers describe their imagery: Where, when, what, why, and how. The Sport Psychologist, 19, 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Short, S. E., Bruggeman, J. M., Engel, S. G., Marback, T. L., Wang, A. W., & Short, M. W. (2002). The effect of imagery function and imagery direction on self-efficacy and performance on a golf putting task. The Sports Psychologists, 16, 48–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramsey, R., Cumming, J., & Edwards, M. G. (2008). Exploring a modified conceptualization of imagery direction and golf putting performance. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6, 207–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lane, A. M., & Jarrett, H. (2005). Mood changes following golf among senior recreational players. Journal of Sport Science and Medicine, 4, 47–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Sports Science and RecreationUniversiti Teknologi MARA Negeri SembilanKuala PilahMalaysia

Personalised recommendations