Advertisement

Deep Sociology

  • John Clammer
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter addresses the crucial question of whether in fact sociology actually answers the questions that it purports to and suggests that in much of its present form the subject is still trapped in a framework of Eurocentric and Cartesian assumptions that would be greatly modified and deepened by considering alternative ways of conceptualizing the social world. The chapter attempts to offer exactly such a fresh viewpoint by investigating alternative sources of sociological insight, including those that might arise from Buddhism, significant thinkers left outside the canon of mainstream sociology, ecology and feminism. The notion of “deep sociology” has obvious analogies with “deep ecology”, and the chapter argues that by exploring that analogy new forms of sociology and social theory can be conceived that open up basic existential questions which, while in some sense implied in conventional sociology, need to be foregrounded. While these include the crucial issue of ecology, they also include such topics as death, love, illness and the body. The chapter provides a sketch of potential new forms of social analysis, which, while it does not deny the concept of the ‘social’, attempts to recast it in creative ways.

Keywords

Cartesianism Ecology Buddhism Process Existence 

References

  1. Alvarez, A. (1974). The Savage God: A Study of Suicide. London and New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  2. Arnason, J. (1989). Culture and Imaginary Significations. Thesis Eleven, 22, 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Athanasiou, T. (1996). Divided Planet: The Ecology of Rich and Poor. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
  4. Badiou, A. (2004). Infinite Thought: Truth and the Return of Philosophy. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  5. Bauman, Z. (1999). Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, E. (1971). The Lost Science of Man. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  7. Berry, T. (1999). The Great Work: Our Way into the Future. New York: Bell Tower.Google Scholar
  8. Bhaskar, R. (2002). Reflections on Meta-Reality: Transcendence, Emancipation and Everyday Life. Thousand Oaks, CA and London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Calasso, R. (1995). The Ruin of Kasch. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  10. Clammer, J. (1995). Difference and Modernity: Social Theory and Contemporary Japanese Society. London and New York: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
  11. Clammer, J. (2000). Cultural Studies/Asian Studies: Alternatives, Intersections and Contradictions in Asian Social Science. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 21(1), 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clammer, J. (2005). Beyond Power: Alternative Conceptions of Being and the (Asian) Reconstruction of Social Theory. Asian Journal of Social Science, 33(1), 62–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clammer, J., Poirier, S., & Schwimmer, E. (Eds.). (2004). Figured Worlds: Ontological Obstacles in Intercultural Relations. Toronto and London: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dunn, R. G. (1998). Identity Crises: A Social Critique of Post-Modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  15. Enright, D. J. (2003). Injury Time. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  16. Ezzy, D. (2004). Old Traditions and New Ages: Religions and Environments. In R. White (Ed.), Controversies in Environmental Sociology (pp. 8–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fuchs, M. (2004). Articulating the World: Social Movements, the Self-Transcendence of Society and the Question of Culture. In A. K. Giri (Ed.), Creative Social Research: Rethinking Theories and Methods (pp. 37–56). Lanham, MD and Oxford: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  18. Hassan, I. (2002). Queries for Postcolonial Studies. In R. Araeen, S. Cubitt, & Z. Sardar (Eds.), The Third Text Reader on Art, Culture and Theory (pp. 232–243). London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  19. Heilman, S. (1984). The Gate Behind the Wall. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Heywood, I. (1997). Social Theories of Art: A Critique. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. International Shinto Foundation. (1995). Shinto to Nihon Bunka [Shinto and Japanese Culture]. Tokyo: International Shinto Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. Kappen, M. (Ed.). (1990). Gandhi and Social Action Today. New Delhi and Bangalore: Sterling Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Keightley, A. (1986). Into Every Life a Little Zen Must Fall. London: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Lockie, S. (2004). Social Nature: The Environmental Challenge to Mainstream Social Theory. In R. White (Ed.), Controversies in Environmental Sociology (pp. 26–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loy, D. R. (2003). The Great Awakening: A Buddhist Social Theory. Boston, MA: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Murphy, R. F. (1987). The Body Silent. London: Phoenix House.Google Scholar
  27. Myerson, G. (2001). Ecology and the End of Postmodernity. Cambridge: Icon Books.Google Scholar
  28. Naess, A. (1973/1995). The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movements, Inquiry 16 (Oslo) reprinted in George Sessions, ed., Deep Ecology for the 21st Century: Readings on the Philosophy and Practice of the New Environmentalism. Boston, MA and London: Shambhala, 151–155.Google Scholar
  29. Naess, A. (1988/1995). Self-Realization: An Ecological Approach to Being in the World. In G. Sessions (Ed.), Deep Ecology for the 21st Century: Readings on the Philosophy and Practice of the New Environmentalism (pp. 225–239). Boston, MA and London: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  30. Overing, J., & Passes, A. (Eds.). (2000). The Anthropology of Love and Anger: The Aesthetics of Conviviality in Native Amazonia. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Phillips, D. Z. (1979). Alienation and the Sociologizing of Meaning. The Aristotelian Society Supplementary, LIII, xxxx.Google Scholar
  32. Pieris, A. (1992). An Asian Theology of Liberation. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
  33. Queen, C., Prebish, C., & Keown, D. (Eds.). (2003). Action Dharma: New Studies in Engaged Buddhism. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
  34. Qutb, S. (2000). Social Justice in Islam. Oneonta, NY: Islamic Publications International.Google Scholar
  35. Sahlins, M. (1996). The Sadness of Sweetness: The Native Anthropology of Western Cosmology. Current Anthropology, 37(5), 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sessions, G. (Ed.). (1995). Deep Ecology for the 21st Century: Readings in the Philosophy and Practice of the New Environmentalism. Boston and London: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  37. Sri Aurobindo. (1962). Human Cycles. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram.Google Scholar
  38. Stoller, P. (1997). Sensuous Scholarship. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Strathern, M. (1988). The Gender of the Gift: Problems About Society and Problems About Women in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  40. Strathern, M. (1990). The Concept of Society Is Theoretically Obsolete: For the Motion (1). In T. Ingold (Ed.), Group for Debate in Anthropological Theory (p. 2). Manchester: Department of Social Anthropology, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  41. Thich, N. H. (1998). Interbeing: Fourteen Guidelines for Engaged Buddhism. Berkeley, CA: Parallax Press.Google Scholar
  42. Thomas, N. (1997). Collectivity and Nationality in the Anthropology of Art. In M. Banks & H. Morphy (Eds.), Rethinking Visual Anthropology (pp. 256–275). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Touraine, A. (1981). The Voice and the Eye: An Analysis of Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Touraine, A. (1985). An Introduction to the Study of Social Movements. Social Research, 52(4), 749–787.Google Scholar
  45. Unger, R. M. (2001). False Necessity: Anti-Necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  46. Weiner, J. F. (2001). Tree Leaf Talk: A Heideggerian Anthropology. Oxford and New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  47. Wilfred, F. (2003). Asian Dreams and Christian Hope. Delhi: ISPCK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Clammer
    • 1
  1. 1.O.P. Jindal Global UniversitySonipatIndia

Personalised recommendations