Advertisement

Beyond Sociology: Cultivating an Ontological Epistemology of Participation

  • Ananta Kumar Giri
Chapter

Abstract

Sociology is part of the agenda of modernity which privileges epistemology to the neglect of ontological issues. In the modernist mode, sociology was considered only an epistemic project, a project of knowing about the world with proper procedure and scientific method and neglected issues of consciousness, self, relationship of subject and object, and ontological issues of self-nurturance and self-transformation. The neglect of ontology is a crucial gap in modernistic sociology which continues to persist even in contemporary new formulations such as cosmopolitan sociology, offered by Ulrich Beck. For Beck, sociology needs to move from methodological nationalism to methodological cosmopolitanism. But this move is primarily methodological and epistemic and does not address the ontological preparation needed for the transformation of sociology from its contemporary binding in nation-state to a cosmopolitan one. This needs a new self-conception on the part of sociologists, not only as citizens of the nation-state but also as citizens of the world and children of Mother Earth. The later self-conception calls for not only reiteration of self-identity as sociologically constituted but also transcendentally nurtured, urging both the sociologists as well as all human beings to realize that they are not only role occupants but also transcendental selves living in varieties of communities but at the same time transcending these. The chapter explores some of these issues as it puts forward the idea of society as multiple movements of ontological epistemology of participation.

References

  1. Agarwala, B. (2004). Humanities and Social Sciences in the New Millennium: Theorizing in/for Society as Play. In A. K. Giri (Ed.), Creative Social Research: Rethinking Theories and Methods (pp. 253–272). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  2. Ankersmit, F. (2002). Historical Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (2001). Individualized Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U. (2000). The Brave New World of Work. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (2002). The Cosmopolitan Society and Its Enemies. Theory, Culture and Society, 19(1–2), 17–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The Normal Chaos of Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Béteille, A. (2002). Sociology: Essays on Approach and Method. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bhaskar, R. (2002a). Meta-Reality. The Philosophy of Meta-Reality, A Philosophy for the Present. Creativity, Love and Freedom, The Bhaskar Series (Vol. I). New Delhi/Thousand Oaks/London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Bhaskar, R. (2002b). Reflections on Meta-Reality: Transcendence, Everyday Life and Emancipations. New Delhi: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1991a). Epilogue: On the Possibility of a Field of World Sociology. In P. Bourdieu & J. S. Coleman (Eds.), Social Theory for a Changing Society (pp. 373–387). Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1991b). The Political Ontology of Martin Heidegger (Peter Collier, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (2003). Participant Objectivation. Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute, 9, 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Carretto, J. (Ed.). (1999). Religion and Culture by Michel Foucault. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Clammer, J. (2009). Sociology and Beyond: Towards a Deep Sociology. Asian Journal of Social Science, 37(3), 332–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clammer, J., Piorier, S., & Schwimmer, E. (2004). Introduction: The Relevance of Ontologies in Anthropology: Reflections on a New Anthropological Field. In J. Clammer et al. (Eds.), Figured Worlds: Ontological Obstacles in Intercultural Relations (pp. 3–22). Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, A. (1994). Self-Consciousness: An Alternative Anthropology of Identity. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Connolly, W. (2002). The Ethos of Pluralization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dallmayr, F. (1984). Polis and Praxis: Exercises in Contemporary Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dallmayr, F. (1987). Critical Encounters: Between Philosophy and Politics. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  21. Dallmayr, F. (1991). Between Freiburg and Frankfurt: Toward a Critical Ontology. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  22. Dallmayr, F. (1993). The Other Heidegger. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dallmayr, F. (1996). Beyond Orientalism: Essays on Cross-Cultural Encounter. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  24. Dallmayr, F. (2001a). Homelessness and Homecoming: Heidegger on the Road (Manuscript). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  25. Dallmayr, F. (2001b). Resisting Totalizing Uniformity: Marin Heidegger on the Macht and Machenschaft. In F. Dallmayr (Ed.), Achieving Our World: Toward a Global and Plural Democracy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  26. Elias, N. (1991). The Society of Individuals. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Faubion, J. D. (Ed.). (1995). Rethinking the Subject: An Anthology of Contemporary European Social Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  28. Freitag, M. (2001). The Contemporary Social Sciences and the Problem of Normativity. Theses Eleven, 65, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fromm, E. (1950). Man for Himself. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  30. Fuchs, M. (2004). Articulating the World: Social Movements, the Self-Transcendence of Society and the Question of Culture. In A. K. Giri (Ed.), Creative Social Research: Rethinking Theories and Methods. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  31. Giddens, A. (1996). In Defense of Sociology: Essays, Interpretations and Rejoinders. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Giri, A. K. (1998). Self, Other and the Challenge of Culture. In Global Transformations: Postmodernity and Beyond. Jaipur: Rawat.Google Scholar
  33. Giri, A. K. (2002). Conversations and Transformations: Toward a New Ethics of Self and Society. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books and Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  34. Gorz, A. (1999). Reclaiming Work: Beyond the Wage-Based Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  35. Greco, J. (2001). Virtues and Rules in Epistemology. In A. Fairweather & L. Zagzebski (Eds.), Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility (pp. 117–141). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Habermas, J. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  37. Knorr-Cetina, K. (2001). Postsocial Relations: Theorizing Society in a Postsocial Environment. In G. Ritzer & B. Smart (Eds.), Handbook of Social Theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Luhman, N. (2001). Notes on the Project ‘Poetry and Social Theory’. Theory, Culture and Society, 18(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mintz, S. W. (2000). Sow’s Ears and Silver Linings: A Backward Look at Ethnography. Current Anthropology, 41(2), 169–189.Google Scholar
  40. Pillai, P. V. (1985). Hind Swaraj in the Light of Heidegger’s Critique of Modernity. In Hind Swaraj: A Fresh Look. Delhi: Gandhi Peace Foundation.Google Scholar
  41. Pollock, S., et al. (2000). Cosmopolitanisms. Public Culture, 12(3), 577–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Radhakrishnan, R. (2003). Theory in an Uneven World. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shanks, A. (2001). What Is Truth? Towards a Theological Poetics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, A. (1976). A Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Srinivasan, A. (1993). The Subject in Fieldwork: Malinowski and Gandhi. Economic and Political Weekly, 28(5).Google Scholar
  46. Sunder Rajan, R. (1998). Beyond the Crises of European Sciences: New Beginnings. Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
  47. Tagore, R. (1961). On Art and Aesthetics. Calcutta: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
  48. Toulmin, S. (2001). Return to Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Touraine, A. (2000). Can We Live Together? Equality and Difference. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  50. Touraine, A. (2007). Sociology After Sociology. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(2), 184–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Uberoi, J. P. S. (2002). The European Modernity: Truth, Science and Method. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Urry, J. (2000). Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. van Staveren, I. (2001). The Values of Economics: An Aristotelian Perspective. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vattimo, G. (1999). Belief. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  55. Wallerstein, I. (1999). The End of the World as We Know It: Social Science for the Twenty-First Century. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  56. Wallerstein, I., et al. (1996). Open the Social Sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ananta Kumar Giri
    • 1
  1. 1.Madras Institute of Development StudiesChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations