Advertisement

Are Societies with a High Value on the Active Ageing Index More Age Integrated?

  • Pearl A. Dykstra
  • Maria Fleischmann
Chapter

Abstract

Combining round four data from the European Social Survey (ESS) with indicators of Active Ageing, Dykstra and Fleischmann examine conditions conducive to age integration. It uses both a behavioural and an attitudinal measure of age integration: the prevalence of cross-age friendships and low levels of ageism. The analyses focus on both “young” (ages 18–30) and “old” (ages 70–90). Interestingly, high levels of independence, health and security in late life, and greater capacity to actively age rather than high levels of working, volunteering, caring and political engagement among the old create the greatest opportunities for meaningful cross-age interactions. Contrary to public belief, “productive ageing” will, in and of itself, not lead to greater age integration.

References

  1. Ajrouch, K. J., Blandon, A., & Antonucci, T. C. (2005). Social networks among men and women: The effects of age and socioeconomic status. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 60, 311–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Binstock, R. H. (1983). The aged as a scapegoat. The Gerontologist, 23, 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binstock, R. H. (2010). 50th anniversary feature article. From compassionate ageism to intergenerational conflict? The Gerontologist, 50, 574585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, R. N. (1969). Age-ism: Another form of bigotry. The Gerontologist, 9, 243–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, A. L. (2012). Policy makes mass politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coleman, J. S. (1982). The asymmetric society. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Emery, T. (2012). Intergenerational conflict: Evidence from Europe. Journal of Population Ageing, 5, 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gonzales, E., Matz-Costa, C., & Morrow-Howel, N. (2015). Increasing opportunities for the productive engagement of older adults: A response to population aging. The Gerontologist, 55, 252–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grefe, D. (2011). Combating ageism with narrative and intergroup contact: Possibilities of intergenerational connections. Pastoral Psychology, 60, 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hagestad, G. O., & Uhlenberg, P. (2005). The social separation of old and young: A root of ageism. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 343–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hagestad, G. O., & Uhlenberg, P. (2006). Should we be concerned about age segregation? Some theoretical and empirical explorations. Research on Aging, 28, 638–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harwood, J., Hewstone, M., Paolini, S., & Voci, A. (2005). Grandparent-grandchild contact and attitudes toward older adults: Moderator and mediator effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lahey, J. N. (2010). International comparison of age discrimination laws. Research on Aging, 32, 679–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Longman, P. (1986). Age wars: The coming battle between young and old. The Futurist, 20, 8–11.Google Scholar
  16. Mead, M. (1970). Culture and commitment: A study of the generation gap. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). An inconvenienced youth? Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 982–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A metaanalytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Riley, M. W., & Riley, J. W., Jr. (2000). Age integration: Conceptual and historical background. The Gerontologist, 40, 266–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith, K. P., & Christakis, N. A. (2008). Social networks and health. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 405–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith, J. A., McPherson, M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2014). Social distance in the United States: Sex, race, religion, age, and education homophily among confidants, 1985 to 2004. American Sociological Review, 79, 432–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Uhlenberg, P. (2000). Why study age integration? The Gerontologist, 40, 276–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Uhlenberg, P., & De Jong Gierveld, J. (2004). Age-segregation in later life: An examination of personal networks. Ageing and Society, 24, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vanderbeck, R. M. (2007). Intergenerational geographies: Age relations, segregation and re-engagements. Geography Compass, 1/2, 200–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zaidi, A., Gasior, K., Hofmarcher, M. M., Lelkes, O., Marin, B., Rodrigues, R., Schmidt, A., Vanhuysse, P., & Zolyomi, E. (2013). Active Ageing Index 2012: Concept, methodology and final results. EC/UNECE, Active Ageing Index Project, UNECE Grant ECE/GC/2012/003. Vienna: European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research. Retrieved from http://www.euro.centre.org/data/aai/1253897823_70974.pdf

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pearl A. Dykstra
    • 1
  • Maria Fleischmann
    • 2
  1. 1.Erasmus UniversityRotterdamNetherlands
  2. 2.University CollegeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations