Are Societies with a High Value on the Active Ageing Index More Age Integrated?
Combining round four data from the European Social Survey (ESS) with indicators of Active Ageing, Dykstra and Fleischmann examine conditions conducive to age integration. It uses both a behavioural and an attitudinal measure of age integration: the prevalence of cross-age friendships and low levels of ageism. The analyses focus on both “young” (ages 18–30) and “old” (ages 70–90). Interestingly, high levels of independence, health and security in late life, and greater capacity to actively age rather than high levels of working, volunteering, caring and political engagement among the old create the greatest opportunities for meaningful cross-age interactions. Contrary to public belief, “productive ageing” will, in and of itself, not lead to greater age integration.
- Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Coleman, J. S. (1982). The asymmetric society. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
- Longman, P. (1986). Age wars: The coming battle between young and old. The Futurist, 20, 8–11.Google Scholar
- Mead, M. (1970). Culture and commitment: A study of the generation gap. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Zaidi, A., Gasior, K., Hofmarcher, M. M., Lelkes, O., Marin, B., Rodrigues, R., Schmidt, A., Vanhuysse, P., & Zolyomi, E. (2013). Active Ageing Index 2012: Concept, methodology and final results. EC/UNECE, Active Ageing Index Project, UNECE Grant ECE/GC/2012/003. Vienna: European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research. Retrieved from http://www.euro.centre.org/data/aai/1253897823_70974.pdf