Advertisement

Organizing the Informal Economy in Senegal

  • Thomas Greven
Chapter

Abstract

The power resources theory of labour is currently a popular instrument for the analysis of workers’ organizing efforts in developed economies with formalized labour markets. As it asks questions about the structural, organizational, institutional and societal (discursive) power resources of labour, it can be applied to the analysis of organizing efforts in economies with high levels of informal employment as well. Using the example of the informal economy in Senegal and specifically the organizing experience of the Confédération Générale des Travailleurs de l’Économie Informelle au Sénégal (CGTIS, Senegalese Confederation of Informal Economy Workers), this chapter explores the possibilities and limits of the power resources theory of labour to analyse informal economies and workers. In addition to traditional dependent workers, the Senegalese informal economy is characterized by small businesses and self-employed workers often acting as employers. These diverse actors are able to articulate mutual interests in an effort to establish institutional protections for labour, particularly for social protection. At the same time, they have organized themselves into joint organizations despite the fact that the diversity of their economic interests as business owners, employers and dependent employees cannot be captured by the power resources theory of labour. I find that Gramsci’s theory of hegemony, which highlights the role of identity in the formation of interests, makes it possible to understand that self-organization in the Senegalese informal economy at this time follows identity much more than class, because the diverse actors, regardless of their actual role, all perceive themselves as underprivileged and under-represented ‘workers’.

Keywords

Informal economy Organizing labour Institutions Social protection 

References

  1. Benjamin, Nancy, and Ahmadou Aly Mbaye (with Ibrahima Thione Diop, Stephen S. Golub, Dominique Haughton, and Birahim Bouna Niang). 2012. The Informal Sector in Francophone Africa. Firm Size, Productivity, and Institutions. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and The World Bank.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, Alison. 2015. Claiming the Streets: Property Rights and Legal Empowerment in the Urban Informal Economy. World Development 76: 238–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, Alison, Michal Lyons, and Ibrahima Dankoco. 2010. Street Traders and the Emerging Spaces for Urban Voice and Citizenship in African Cities. Urban Studies 47 (3): 666–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, Alison, Colman Msoka, and Ibrahima Dankoco. 2015. A Refugee in My Own Country: Evictions or Property Rights in the Urban Informal Economy? Urban Studies 52 (12): 2234–2249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cissokho, Sidy. 2014. Les relations de travail dans la gare routière de ‘Pompiers‘ (Sénégal). Représentations spatiales, enjeux hiérarchiques et compétition dans les Interstices. Terrains & travaux 2 (25): 179–197.Google Scholar
  6. Dörre, Klaus, and Stefan Schmalz. 2013. Einleitung: Comeback der Gewerkschaften? Eine Machtsoziologische Forschungsperspektive. In Comeback der Gewerkschaften. Machtressourcen, innovative Praktiken, internationale Perspektiven, ed. Stefan Schmalz and Klaus Dörre, 13–38. Frankfurt am Main/New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  7. Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Greven, Thomas. 2016. Die Transnationalisierung des gewerkschaftlichen Organisationslernens. In Globalisierung analysieren, kritisieren und verändern. Das Projekt Kritische Wissenschaft, ed. Ulrich Brand, Helen Schwenken, and Joscha Wullweber, 189–206. Hamburg: VSA.Google Scholar
  9. International Labor Organization (ILO). 2012. Programme Pays de Promotion du Travail decent au Senegal 2012–2015. Geneva: International Labor Office.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2013. Women and Men in the Informal Economy: A Statistical Picture. 2nd ed. Geneva: International Labor Office.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2015. Recommendation 204 Concerning the Transition from the Informal to the Formal Economy. Adopted by the International Labor Conference at its 104th Session, 12 June, Geneva.Google Scholar
  12. Interview with Ismaila Diack. 2016. Chargé de Programmes, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Dakar, September 6.Google Scholar
  13. Interview with Mamadou Fall. 2016. President of SUDEMS and CGTIS, Dakar, September 22.Google Scholar
  14. Minard, C. Sara L. 2009. Valuing Entrepreneurship in the Informal Economy in Senegal. Social Enterprise Journal 5 (3): 186–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Osei-Boateng, Clara, and Edward Ampartwum. 2011. The Informal Sector in Ghana. Accra: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Ghana Office.Google Scholar
  16. Schmalz, Stefan, and Klaus Dörre. 2014. Der Machtressourcenansatz: Ein Instrument zur Analyse gewerkschaftlichen Handlungsvermögens. Industrielle Beziehungen 21 (3): 217–237.Google Scholar
  17. Silver, Beverly J. 2003. Forces of Labor. Workers’ Movements and Globalization Since 1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Greven
    • 1
  1. 1.John F. Kennedy InstituteFree University of BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations