This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Penrose, in his interesting comparison between the Athenians and Spartans, shows how much more sympathetic the Athenians were, than the Spartans. He argues that ‘…in Sparta, the failure to recognise the disability caused by impairment was a harsh form of prejudice…The Athenians allowed disabled veterans and others to be exempted from military service and to collect a pension, whereas no consistent record of exemption is extant from Sparta’ (Penrose, 2015, p. 522).
- 2.
In the late eighteenth century, the western USA and some northern European countries gave women the vote. The full right to vote in Australia came with Federation in 1901. In the UK, it was not until 1928 that women had the same voting rights as men and in Switzerland, not until 1971. Prior to that age restrictions applied (making their voting numbers smaller than men) and various property or rate paying requirements which prevented their suffrage.
- 3.
Lancet 3 February 1891.
- 4.
BMJ, 4 July 1890.
- 5.
BMJ, 18 March 1893.
References
Abberley, P. (1999, April 15). The significance of work for the citizenship of disabled people. Paper presented at the University College, Dublin. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disabilitystudies/archive/abbarley/sigofwork.pdf
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-III (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-III-R (3rd ed. rev.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-IV (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-IV-TR (4th ed. rev.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-V (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Barnes, C., Oliver, M., & Barton, L. (2002). Disability studies today. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
Barton, (1959). Institutional neurosis. Bristol: Stonebridge Press.
Belanger, H. G., Kretzmer, T., Yoash-Gantz, R., Pickett, T., & Tupler, L. A. (2009). Cognitive sequelae of blast-related versus other mechanisms of brain trauma. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15(01), 1–8.
Blessing, C. J., Golden, T. P., & Bruyère, S. M. (2009). Evolution of disability policies and practices in the United States: Implications for global implementation of person-centered planning. In C. A. Marshall (Ed.), Disabilities: Insights from across fields and around the world (Vol. 3: Responses: Practice, legal, and political frameworks, pp. 1–16). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Boake, C., & Diller, L. (2005). History of rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. In W. M. High (Ed.), Rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury (pp. 3–13). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Bogdan, R. (2014). Freak Show: Presenting human oddities for amusement and profit. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, D. (1993). Handicapism. In M. Nagler (Ed.), Perspectives on disability: Text and readings on disability (2nd ed., pp. 69–76). Palo Alto, CA: Health Markets Research.
Bourdieu, P. (1994). Structures, habitus, power: Basis for a theory of symbolic power. In N. B. Dirks, G. Eley, & S. B. Ortner (Eds.), Culture/power/history: A reader in contemporary social theory (pp. 155–199). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Bracken, P., & Thomas, P. (2001). Postpsychiatry: A new direction for mental health. British Medical Journal, 322, 724–727.
Caldwell, K. (2010). We exist: Intersectional in/visibility in bisexuality and disability. Disability Studies Quarterly, 32(1). doi:10.18061/dsq.v30i3/4.1273
Chappell, A. (1998). Still out in the cold: People with learning difficulties and the social model of disability. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), The disability reader: Social science perspectives (pp. 207–231). London, England: Cassell.
Claeys, G. (2000). The “Survival of the Fittest” and the origins of Social Darwinism. Journal of the History of Ideas, 61(2), 223–240.
Durham, C. (1997). Doing up buttons. Ringwood, Australia: Penguin.
Dykens, E. (2006). Toward a positive psychology of mental retardation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76(2), 176–193.
Felce, D., Grant, G., Todd, S., Ramcharan, P., Beyer, S., McGrath, M., et al. (1998). Towards a full life: Researching policy innovation for people with learning disabilities. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
Finkelstein, V. (1980). Attitudes and disabled people: Issues for discussion. New York, NY: World Rehabilitation Fund.
Finkelstein, V. (1993). The commonality of disability. In J. Swain (Ed.), Disabling barriers: Enabling environments (pp. 9–16). London, England: Sage.
Garland-Thomas, R. (1997). Integrating disability studies into the existing curriculum. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 295–306). New York, NY: Routledge.
Gill, C. (1993). Isolation: Confronting the painful social realities that come with disability. Mainstream, 9(1), 18–25.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation on mental patients and other inmates. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Goodley, D., & Ramcharan, P. (2010). Advocacy, Campaiging and people with learning difficulties. In G. Grant, P. Ramcharan, M. Flynn, & M. Richardson (Eds.), Learning disability: A life cycle approach. London: Open University Press and McGraw-Hill Educational.
Grant, G., & Ramcharan, P. (2007). Valuing people and research: The learning disability research initiative overview report. London: Department of Health.
International Brain Injury Association. (2011). History of IBIA. Retrieved from http://www.internationalbrain.org/?q=history
Jones, E., Fear, N., & Wessely, S. (2007). Shell shock and mild traumatic brain injury: A historical review. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(11), 1641–1645.
Longmore, P. K. (2003). Why I burned my book & other essays on disability. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Mackelprang, R. W., & Salsgiver, R. O. (1999). Disability: A diversity model approach in human service practice. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Masala, C., & Petretto, D. R. (2008). From disablement to enablement: Conceptual models of disability in the 20th century. Disability Rehabilitation, 30(17), 1233–1244. doi:10.1080/09638280701602418.
McClimens, A., & Richardson, M. (2010). Social construction and social model: Disability explained? In G. Grant, P. Ramcharan, M. Flynn, & M. Richardson (Eds.), Learning Disability: A life cycle approach, pp. 19–33. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press and McGraw-Hill Educational.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London and New York: Routledge Classics.
Metzler, I. (2013). A social history of disability in the middle ages: Cultural considerations of physical impairment. New York, NY: Routledge.
Morris, J. (1991). Pride against prejudice: Transforming attitudes to disability. London, England: Women’s Press.
Nielson, K. E. (2012). A disability history of the United States. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2001). Adaptive preference and women’s options. Economics and Philosophy, 17, 67–88.
Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan.
Oliver, M. (2004). If I had a hammer: The social model in action. In J. Swain (Ed.), Disabling barriers: Enabling environments (2nd ed., pp. 7–12). London, England: Sage.
Olkin, R. (1999). What psychotherapists should know about disability. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Penrose, W. D. (2015). The discourse of disability in ancient greece. Classical World, 108(4), 499–523.
Pike, K. L. (1954). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behaviour, Vol. 1. Glendale, CA: Summer Institute of Linguistics (The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton, 1967
Ramcharan, P. (2016).Understanding the NDIS: a history of disability welfare from ‘deserving poor’ to consumers in control, The Conversation, July 6th. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/understanding-the-ndis-a-history-of-disability-welfare-from-deserving-poor-to-consumers-in-control-58069
Ramcharan, P., Roberts, G., Grant, G., & Borland, J. (1996). Empowerment in everyday life: Learning disability. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Richardson, M. (2005) Critiques of Segregation and eugenics. In G. Grant, P. Goward, M. Richardson & P. Ramcharan (Eds) Learning Disability: A life cycle approach to Valuing People. Open University press and McGraw-Hill Educational.
Rollin, H. R. (2003). Psychiatry in Britain one hundred years ago. British Journal of Psychiatry, 183, 292–298.
Schutz, A. & Luckmann, T. (1973). The structures of the life-world. (R.M. Zaner & H. Tristan Englehardt Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Scull, A. T. (1989). Social order/mental disorder: Anglo-American psychiatry in historical perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Shakespeare, T., & Watson, N. (2001). The social model of disability: An outdated ideology? Research in Social Science and Disability, 2, 9–28.
Shakespeare, T. (2006). The social model of disability. The Disability Studies Reader, 2, 197–204.
Sherry, M. (2006). If I only had a brain: Deconstructing brain injury. New York, NY: Routledge.
Smart, J. F. (2009). The power of models of disability. Journal of Rehabilitation, April–June, 1–11.
Stubblefield, A. (2007). Beyond the pale: Tainted whiteness, cognitive disability and eugenic sterilization. Hypatia, 22(2), 162–181. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb00987.
Swain, J., & French, S. (2004). Whose tragedy: Towards a personal non-tragedy view of disability. In J. Swain (Ed.), Disabling barriers: Enabling environments (2nd ed., pp. 34–40). London, England: Sage.
Thompson, M. (2010). Disability, psychiatry and eugenics. In A. Bashford & P. Levine (Eds.), The oxford handbook of the history of eugenics (pp. 116–134). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Treffert, D. A. (2014). Savant Syndrome: Realities, Myths and Misconceptions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 44(3), 564–571.
UPIAS. (1976). Fundamental principles of disability. London, England: Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation.
Wolfensberger, W. (1973). The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto, Canada: York University Campus, National Institute on Mental Retardation.
Wolfensberger, W. (1983). Social role valorization: A proposed new term for the principle of normalization. Mental Retardation, 21(6), 234–239.
World Health Organisation. (1980). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICIDH-2). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
Wortzel, H. S. & Arciniegas, D. B. (n.d.). The DSM-5 approach to evaluating traumatic brain injury. Veterans Affairs and Rocky Mountain MIRECC.
Yudofsky, S. C., & Hales, R. E. (2002). Editorial: Neuoropsychiatry and the future of psychiatry and neurology. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Durham, C., Ramcharan, P. (2018). Understanding the Assumptions of Major Models of Disability Theory. In: Insight into Acquired Brain Injury. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5666-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5666-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5665-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5666-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)