Advertisement

Role of Personal Care Products and Phototoxicity

  • Syed Faiz Mujtaba
  • Ajeet K. Srivastav
  • Shikha Agnihotry
  • Sandeep Negi
  • Jaya Upadhayay
  • Ratan S. Ray
Chapter

Abstract

Cosmetics are chemical substances or products that are used to change the look or fragrance of the human beings. Mostly cosmetics are applied usually on the face and hair area. Sun acts as a natural source of different wavelengths that also contains ultraviolet (UV-A, UV-B, and UV-C) and many other radiations. Many ingredients present in cosmetics show absorption maxima (λmax) under visible light followed by ultraviolet radiation. Photosensitization of cosmetics results in the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), i.e., 1O2 and O2, by the two different photosensitization mechanisms (type-I and type-II). The photosensitization of cosmetic products finally leads to ROS production and photoproduct formation. Oxidative stress mediated damage to biomolecules including DNA, formation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), etc. Various adverse effects of cosmetics are being reported in the research articles that relate to genotoxicity, mutagenicity, photosensitization, skin irritation, acute toxicity, percutaneous absorption, and eye irritation. Endogenous and exogenous antioxidants suppress cosmetic toxicity as well as cellular defense machinery (Keap1/Nrf2 and MAPK) pathways. Phototoxicity of cosmetics may lead to skin and ocular damage as well as immune suppression. India is among the tropical countries, where most of the activities are done by common man in the bright sunlight like agriculture, commerce, sports, etc. Thus, information is needed regarding the cosmetic photoproducts and its phototoxicity for total human safety.

Keywords

Cosmetics Photosensitization Photoproducts UV-R 

References

  1. 1.
    Foley P, Nixon R, Marks R, Frowen K, Thompson S (1993) The frequency of reactions to sunscreens. Results of a longitudinal population based study on the regular use of sunscreen in Australia. Br J Dermatol 128:512–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Linda B, Sedlewiez BS (2005) Cosmetic preservatives: friend or foe? Skinmed 4:8–100Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dogra A, Minocha YC, Kaur S (2003) Adverse reactions to cosmetics. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 69:165–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Center for Disease Control (CDC) (2003) Second national report on human exposure to environmental chemicalsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nohynek GJ, Antignae E, Re T, Toutain H (2010) Safety assessment of personal care products/cosmetics and their ingredients. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 243:239–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bolt HM, Golka K (2007) The debate on carcinogenicity of permanent hair dyes: new insights. Crit Rev Toxicol 37(6):521–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Sanjose S, Benavente y, Nieters A (2006) Association between personal use of hair dyes and lymphoid neoplasms in Europe. Am J Epidemiol 164(1):47–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kornhauser A, Wei RR, Yamaguchi Y, Coelho SG, Kaidbey K, Barton C, Takahashi K, Beer JZ, Miller SA, Hearing VJ (2009) The effects of topically applied glycolic acid and salicylic acid on ultraviolet radiation- induced erythema, DNA damage and sunburn cell formation in human skin. J Dermatol Sci 1:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gonzalez H, Wahlberg NT, Stromdahl B, Juzeniene A, Moan J, Larko O, Rosen A, Wennberg AM (2007) Photostability of commercial sunscreens upon sun exposure and irradiation of ultraviolet lamps. BMC Dermatol 7:1PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schlecht C, Klammer H, Franendorf H, Wuttke W, Jarry H (2008) Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of benzophenone-2 in the rat. Toxicology 245:11–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Fabo EC (2005) Artic stratospheric ozone depletion and UV-B radiation: potential impacts to human health. Int J Circumpolar Health 64:509–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sage E, Guirard PM, Francesconi S (2012) Unravelling, UV-A induced mutagenesis. Photochem Photobiol Sci 11:74–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cadet J, Sage E, Douki T (2005) Ultraviolet radiation- mediated damage to cellular DNA. Mutat Res/Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen 571(1–2):3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Amar SK, Goyal S, Mujtaba SF, Dwivedi A, Kushwaha HN, Verma A, Chopra D, Chaturvedi RK, Ray RS (2015) Role of type I and type II reactions in DNA damage and activation of caspase 3 via mitochondrial pathway induced by photosensitized benzophenone. Toxicol Lett 235:84–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johansen JD, Rastogi SC, Menne T, Johansen JD (1996) Threshold responses in cinnamic-aldehyde- sensitive subjects: results and methodological aspects. Contact Dermatitis 34:165–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aharez-Rivera G, Llompart M, Garcia-Jares C, Lores M (2015) Identification of unwanted photoproducts of cosmetic preservatives in personal care products under ultraviolet- light using solid phase micro extraction and micro- matrix solid phase dispersion. J Chromatogr A 1390:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goyal S, Amar SK, Dubey D, Pal MK, Singh J, Verma A, Kushwaha HN, Ray RS (2015) Involvement of cathepsin B in mitochondrial apoptosis by p-phenylenediamine under ambient UV radiation. J Hazard Mater 300:415–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lewis D, Mama J, Hawkes J (2013) A review of aspects of oxidative hair dye chemistry with special reference to N- nitrosamine formation. Materials 6:517–534PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McArdle F, Rhodes LE, Parslew R, Jack CIA, Friedmann PS, Jackson MJ (2002) UV-R induced oxidative stress in human skin in vivo: effects of oral vitamin c supplementation. Free Rad Biol Med 33(10):1355–1362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Conto AC, Ferreira JD, Rosa ACS, Ponnbo-de-oliveira MS, Koifman S, Brazilian Collaboration study group of infant acute leukemia (2013) Pregnancy, maternal exposure to hair dyes and hair straightening cosmetics and early age leukemia. Chem-Biol Interact 205:46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saitta P, Christopher EC, Jane LM, Ronald B, Benedict CW, Steven KG, Holland J (2013) Is there a true concern regarding the use of hair dye and malignancy development? J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 6(1):39–46PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thyssen JP, Sosted H, Uter W, Schnuch A, Gimenez-Arnan AM, Vigan M, Rustemeyer T, Granum B, McFadded J, White JM, White IR, Goossens A, Menne T, Liden C, Johansen JD (2012) Self testing for contact sensitization to hair dyes-scientific considerations and clinical concerns of an industry-led screening programme. Contact Dermatitis 66(6):300–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Steiling W, Kreutz J, Hofer H (2001) Percutaneous penetration/dermal absorption of hair dyes in vitro. Toxicol In Vitro 15(4–5):565–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Krause M, Klit A, Blomberg Jensen M, Soeborg T, Frederiksen H, Schlumpf M, Lichtensteiger W, Skakkeback NE, Drzewiecki KT (2012) Sunscreens: are they beneficial for health? An overview of endocrine disrupting properties of UV-filters. Int J Androl 35(3):424–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Suzuki T, Kitamura S, Khota R, Sugihara K, Fujimoto N, Ohta S (2005) Estrogenic and antiandrogenic activities of 17 benzophenone derivatives used as UV stabilizers and sunscreens. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 203:9–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Weiqmann HJ, Schanzer S, Antonion C, Sterry W, Lademann J (2010) Influence of the absorption behavior of sunscreens in the short-wavelength UV-range (UV-B) and the long wavelength UV-range (UV-A) on the relation of the UV-B absorption to sun protection factor. J Biomed Opt 15(5):055008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kockler J, Oelgemoller M, Robertson S, Glass BD (2012) Photostability of sunscreens. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 13:91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zakaria A, Bin Yo Y (2015) Heavy metals contamination in lipsticks and their associated health risks to lipstick consumers. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 73(1):191–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hans RK, Agarwal N, Verma K, Misra RB, Ray RS, Farooq M (2008) Assessment of the phototoxic potential cosmetic products. Food Chem Toxicol 46:1653–1658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mohta A (2010) A dangerous cosmetic. Oman J Opthalmol 3(2):100–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jain JP, Raiyani CV, Desai NM, Kashyap SK (1988) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in kajal and surma eye cosmetic preparations. Hum Toxicol 79(2):195–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Patel DK, Prasad S, Tripathi R, Behari JR (2009) The level of Polyaromatic hydrocarbons in kajal and surma of major Indian brands. Int J Cosmet Sci 31:177–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang L, Yan J, Wang S, Cohly H, Fu PP, Hwang HM, Yu H (2004) Phototoxicity and DNA damage induced by the cosmetic ingredient chemical azulene in human Jurkat T-cells. Mutat Res 562(1–2):143–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chequer FMD, Venancio de Paula V, de Souza Prado MR, Cunha Junior LRC, Lizier TM, Zanoni MVB, Burbano RR, Bianchi MLP, Antunes LMG (2015) The cosmetic dye quinoline yellow causes DNA damage in vitro. Mutat Res Genetic Toxicol Environ Mutagen 777:54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kim S, Jin S, Pfeifer GP (2013) Formation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers at dipyrimidines containing 5- hydroxymethylcytosine. Photochem Photobiol Sci 12(8):1409–1415PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Serpone N, Salinaro A, Emeline AV, Horikoshi S, Kidaka H, Zhao JC (2002) An in vitro systematic spectroscopic examination of the photostabilities of a random set of commercial sunscreen lotions and their chemical UVB/UVA active agents. Photochem Photobiol Sci 1:970–981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shaath NA (2010) Ultraviolet filters. Photochem Photobiol Sci 9:464–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vielhaber G, Grether-Beck S, Koch O, Johncock W, Krutmann J (2006) Sunscreens with an absorption maximum of ≥ 360 nm provide optimal protection against UVA1- induced expression of matrix metalloproteinase-1, interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 in human dermal fibroblasts. Photochem Photobiol 5:275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Paris C, Lhianbet-vallet V, Jimenez O, Trullas C, Miranda M (2009) A blocked diketo form of Avobenzone, photostability, photosensitizing properties and triplet quenching by a Triazine-derived UVB filter. Photochem Photobiol 85(1):178–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Seite S, Moyal D, Richard S, de Rigal J, Leveque JL, Hoursean C, Fourtainer A (1998) MexorylSx: a broad absorption UVA filter protects human skin from the effects of repeated suberythemal doses of UVA. J Photochem Photobiol 44(1):69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mitchell SC, Waring RH (2002) Aminophenols. In: Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Wiley-VCH.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007.a02_099
  42. 42.
    Boer J, Jemee GB (2010) Resorcinol peels as a possible self treatment of painful nodules in hidradenitis suppurativa. Clin Exp Dermatol 35(1):36–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Burnett C, Bergfeld W, Velsito D, Klaassen C, Marks J, Shank JR, Slaga T, Snyder P, Andersen F (2010) Final amended report of the safety assessment of Toluene-2,5 diamine, Toluene-2,5 diamine sulfate and Toluene-3,4- diamine as used in cosmetics. Int J Toxicol 29:61S–83SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Inbaraj JJ, Kukielczak BM, Chignell CF (2005) Phloxine B phototoxicity: a mechanistic study using HaCaT keratinocytes. Photochem Photobiol 81(1):81–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zheng H, Pan Y, Xiang X (2007) Oxidation of acidic dye Eosin Y by the solar photo fenton processes. J Hazard Mater 141(3):457–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Paterson I (2003) A dictionary of colour, pp 35, 169, 228, 396Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hanson KM, Enrico G, Christopher JB (2006) Sunscreen enhancement of UV-induced reactive oxygen species in the skin. Free Radic Biol Med 41:1205–1212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Senthilkumaran S, Thirumalaikolundusubramanian P (2015) Acute hair dye poisoning: lurking dangers. J Mahatma Gandhi Inst Med Sci 20(1):33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mckelvey W, Jeffery N, Clark N, Kass D, Parsons (2011) Population based inorganic mercury biomonitoring and the identification of skin care products as a source of exposure in New York city. Environ Health Perspect 119(2):203–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Anonymous (2011) FDA bans skin whitening products due to mercury content. The manila paper, 6 August 2011Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gonzalez H, Farbrot A, Larko O, Wennberg AM (2006) Percutaneous absorption of the sunscreen benzophenone-3 after repeated whole body applications with and without UV-radiation. Br J Dermatol 154:337–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tarras-Wahlberg N, Stenhagen G, Larko O, Rosen A, Wennberg AM, Wennerstrom O (1999) Changes in ultraviolet absorption of sunscreens after ultraviolet irradiation. J Invest Dermatol 113:547–553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Alvarez-Rivera G, Llompart M, Garcia-Jares C, Lores M (2014) Identification of halogenated photoproducts generated after ultraviolet-irradiation of parabens and benzoates in water containing chlorine by solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1349:105–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Allam KV, Kumar GP (2011) Colorants- the cosmetics for the pharmaceutical dosage forms. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 3:13–21Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Darr D, Combs S, Dunston S, Manning T, Pinnell S (1992) Topical vitamin C protects porcine skin from ultraviolet radiation induced. Br J Dermatol 127:247–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Blatt T, Wenck H, Wittern KP (2010) Alterations of energy metabolism in cutaneous aging. In: Farage MA, Miller KW, Maibach HI (eds) Text book of aging skin. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rinnerthaler M, Bischof J, Streubel MK, Trost A, Richter K (2015) Oxidative stress in aging human skin. Biomol Ther 5(2):545–589Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sander CS, Chang H, Salzmann S, Muller CSL, Mudiyanselage SE, Elsner P, Thiele JJ (2002) Photoaging is associated with protein oxidation in human skin in vivo. J Invest Dermatol 118(4):618–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Saha D, Tamrakar A (2011) Xenobiotics, oxidative stress, free radical vs antioxidants: dance of death to heaven’s life. Asian J Res Pharm Sci 1(2):36–38Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Klaunig JE, Kamendulis LM, Hocevar BA (2010) Oxidative stress and oxidative damage in carcinogenesis. Toxicol Pathol 38(1):96–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Lassalle Y, Kinani A, Rifai A, Sonissi Y, Clavaquera C, Bourcier S, Jaber F, Bouchonnet S (2014) UV-visible degradation of boscalid- structural characterization of photoproducts and potential toxicity using in silico tests. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 28(10):1153–1163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sinha RP, Hader DP (2002) UV- induced DNA damage and repair. A review. Photochem Photobiol Sci 1(4):225–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Rastogi RP, Richa, Kumar A, Tyagi MB, Sinha RP (2010) Molecular mechanisms of ultraviolet radiation induced DNA damage and repair. J Nucleic Acids 592980:p32Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Tronnier H (1971) Photoallergy and photosensitization due to cosmetics. Med Klin 65(11):510–514PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Foote CS (1991) Definition of type I and type II photosensitized oxidation. Photochem Photobiol 54(5):659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Kuamagai Y, Kanada H, Shinkai Y, Toyama T (2013) The role of the Keap1/Nrf2 pathway in the cellular response to methylmercury. Oxidative Med Cell Longev 848279:p8Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Dodson M, Redmann M, Rajasekaran NS, Darley-Usmar V, Zhang J (2015) KEAP1-NRF2 signalling and autophagy in protection against oxidative and proteotoxicity. Biochem J 469(3):347–355PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Ghattas MH, Chuang LT, Kappas A, Abraham NG (2002) Protective effect of HO-1 against oxidative stress in human hepatoma cell line (HepG2) is independent of telomerase enzyme activity. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 34(12):1619–1628PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Jaramillo MC, Zhang DD (2013) The emerging role of the Nrf2-Keap1 signaling pathway in cancer. Genes Dev 27:2179–2219PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kansanen E, Kuosmanen SM, Leinonen H, Levonen AL (2013) The Keap1/Nrf2 pathway: mechanism of activation and dysregulation in cancer. Redox Biol 1(1):45–49PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Son Y, Cheong YK, Kin NH, Chung HT, Kang DG, Pae HO (2011) Mitogen-activated protein kinases and reactive oxygen species: how can ROS activate MAPK pathways? J Signal Transduct 2011:792639 p6PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Groot D, Beverdam EG, Ayong Ch T, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP (1988) The role of contact allergy in the spectrum of adverse effects caused by cosmetics and toiletries. Arch Dermatol 124:1525–1529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Galiotte MP, Kohler P, Mussi G, Gattas GJ (2008) Assessment of occupational genotoxic risk among Brazilian hairdressers. Ann Occup Hyg 52:645–651PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Sanjose S, Benavente Y, Nicters A, Foretova L, Maynadie M, Cocco PL et al (2006) Association between personal use of hair dyes and lymphoid neoplasm in Europe. Am J Epidermiol 164:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Zhang Y, Kim C, Zheng T (2012) Hair dye use and risk of human cancer. Front Biosci 4:516–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Asschenfeldt BL, Huegel R, Brasch J (2005) Anaphylactic reaction caused by the UV-A absorber disodium phenyldibenzimidazole tetra sulfonate. Acta Derm Venereol 85:280–281Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Fernandez-Garcie E (2014) Skin protection against UV-light by dietary antioxidants. Food Funct 5(9):1994–2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Minamoto K (2010) Skin sensitizers in cosmetics and skin care products. Nihon EiseiqaknZasshi 65(1):20–29Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Tomankova K, Kejlova K, Binder S, Daskova A, Zapletalova J, Bendova H, Kolarova H, Jirova D (2011) In vitro cytotoxicity and phototoxicity study of cosmetics colorants. Toxicol In Vitro 25(6):1242–1250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Amouroux I, Pesando D, Noel H, Girard JP (1999) Mechanism of cytotoxicity by cosmetic ingredients in sea urchin eggs. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 36(1):28–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Chen R, Chen J, Cheng S, Qin J, Lui W, Zhang L, Jiao H, Yu X, Zhang X, Lahu BT, Xiang AP (2010) Assessment of embryotoxicity of compounds in cosmetics by the embryonic stem cell test. Toxicol Mech Methods:1–7Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Huncharech M, Kupelnick B (2005) Personal use of hair dyes and the risk of bladder cancer: result of meta-analysis. Public Health Rep 120:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Syed Faiz Mujtaba
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ajeet K. Srivastav
    • 1
    • 3
  • Shikha Agnihotry
    • 4
  • Sandeep Negi
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jaya Upadhayay
    • 3
  • Ratan S. Ray
    • 2
  1. 1.Photobiology DivisionC.S.I.R-Indian Institute of Toxicology ResearchLucknowIndia
  2. 2.Department of Zoology, Faculty of ScienceShia P.G. College, University of LucknowLucknowIndia
  3. 3.Babu Banarasi Das UniversityLucknowIndia
  4. 4.Department of Biomedical-InformaticsSanjay Gandhi Post Graduate InstituteLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations