Numerical Modeling of Pavement Slab Subjected to Blast Loading

  • Jun Wu
  • Hao Wu
  • Hong Wei Andy Tan
  • Soon Hoe Chew
Part of the Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering book series (SPRTRCIENG)


The numerical analysis of the conventional pavement system and the proposed multi-layer pavement system under blast load will be conducted. The key results from numerical models will be discussed based on the parametric study for the proposed multi-layer pavement system. The design chart for proposed multi-layer pavement system under different blast energies will be further developed.


  1. AUTODYN (2003). Theory Manual, Century Dynamics, IncGoogle Scholar
  2. Benson DJ (1992) Computational methods in lagrangian and eulerian hydrocodes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 99:235–394MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bessette G C, Littlefield DL (1998) Analysis of transverse loading in long-rod penetrations by oblique plates. shock compression of condensed matter. American Institute of Physics Press, New York, S 937–940Google Scholar
  4. Bischoff P, Perry S (1991) Compressive Behaviour of Concrete at High Strain Rates. Materials and Structures, 24(6):425–450Google Scholar
  5. CEB-FIP (2008) Constitutive modelling of high strength/high performance concreteGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen WF (1982) Constitutive equations for engineering materials. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen WF (1994) Constitutive Equations for Engineered Materials Vol 2 Plasticity and Modeling, Elsevier Science B.V. Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  8. Comite Euro-International du Beton (1993) CEP-FIP Model Code 1990. Redwood Books, TrowbridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gebbeken N, Greulich S, Pietzsch A (2006) Hugoniot properties for concrete determined by full-scale detonation experiments and flyer-plate-impact test. Int J Impact Eng 32:2017–2031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hansson H, Skoglund P, Unosson M (2001) Structural protection for stationary/mobile tactical behaviour weapons and protection, TumbaGoogle Scholar
  11. Malvar LJ, Crawford JE, Wesevich JW (1996) A new concrete material model for DYNA3D release II: shear dilation and directional rate enhancements. Defense Nuclear Agency, AlexandriaGoogle Scholar
  12. Karihaloo BL, Nallathambi P (1990) Effective crack model for the determination of fracture toughness (Kice) of concrete. Eng Fract Mech 35(4/5):637–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim KW, Hussein ME (1997) Variation of fracture toughness of asphalt concrete under low temperature. Constr Build Mater 11:403–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee SC (2006). Finite element modeling of hybrid-fiber ecc targets subjected to impact and blast. Ph.D Thesis, National University of SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  15. Li QM, Meng H (2003) About the dynamic strength enhancement of concrete-like materials in a split Hopkinson pressure bar test. Int J Solids Struct 40:343–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lok TS, Pei JS (1997) Steel fibre reinforced concrete panels subjected to blast loading. Proceeding of 8th international symposium on interaction of the effect of munitions with structures. McLean, VA, USA. IB: 701–711Google Scholar
  17. Loria M, Hopperstad OS, Borvik T, Berstad T (2008) Numercial Predictions of Ballistic Limit for Concrete Slabs Using a Modified Version of the HJC Concrete Model. Int J of Impact Eng 35:290–303Google Scholar
  18. LSDYNA (2007). LSDYNA keyword user’s manual, livermore software technology corporation (LSTC). Livermore, California.Google Scholar
  19. Lu YB, Li QM (2011) About the dynamic uniaxial tensile strength of concrete-like materials. Int J Impact Eng 38:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maalej M, Quek ST, Zhang J (2005) Behavior of hybrid-fiber engineered cementitious composites subjected to dynamic tensile loading and projectile impact. J Mater Civ Eng 17(2):143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Magallanes JM et al. (2010) Recent improvements to release III of the K&C concrete model. 11th international LSDYNA users conference. Detroit, USA. 3: 37–48Google Scholar
  22. Malvar LJ, Crawford JE (1998) Dynamic increase factors for steel reinforcing bars twenty-eighth department of defense explosives safety seminar Orlando. Macmillan Publishers, FL, USAGoogle Scholar
  23. Malvar LJ, Ross CA (1998) Review of strain rate effects for concrete in tension. ACI Material Journal 95(6):735–739Google Scholar
  24. Malvar LJ et al (1997) A plasticity concrete material model for DYNA3D. Int J Impact Eng 19(9–10):847–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nyström U, Gylltoft K (2011) Comparative numerical studies of projectile impacts on plain and steel-fibre reinforced concrete. Int J Impact Eng 38:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ottosen NS, Ristinmaa M (2005) The mechanics of constitutive modeling. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  27. Park DW et al (2005) Characterization of permanent deformation of an asphalt mixture using a mechanistic approach. KSCE J Civ Eng 9(3):213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ross CA, Jerome DM, Tedesco JW (1996) Moisture and strain rate effects on concrete strength. ACI Mater J 93(3):293–300Google Scholar
  29. Ross CA, Thompson PY, Tedesco JW (1989) Split-hopkinson pressure bar test on concrete strength. ACI Mater J 86(5):475–481Google Scholar
  30. Sadd MH et al (2007) Interfacial failure behavior of concrete-asphalt bi-materials. sem annual conference and exposition on experimental and applied mechanics: 1421–1430Google Scholar
  31. Schwerv LE, Day J (1991) Computational techniques for penetration of concrete and steel targets by oblique impact of deformable projectiles. Nucl Eng Des 125(2): 215–238Google Scholar
  32. Seibi AC et al (2001) Constitutive relations for asphalt concrete under high rates of loading. transportation research record 1767. Washington D.C, National Research Council, S 111–119Google Scholar
  33. Showichen A (2008) Numerical analysis of vehicle bottom structures subjected to anti-tank mine explosions. Ph.D thesis PhD, Cranfield UniversityGoogle Scholar
  34. Tan SA., Low BH, Fwa TF (1994) Behavior of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures in Triaxial Compression. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 22(3): 195–203Google Scholar
  35. Tang WH, Ding YQ, Yuan XY (2009) The HJC model parameters of an asphalt mixture. DYMAT 2009 – 9th international conference on the mechanical and physical behaviour of materials under dynamic loading. 2: 1419–1423Google Scholar
  36. Tashman L et al (2005) A microstructure-based viscoplastic model for asphalt concrete. Int J Plast 21:1659–1685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tekalur SA et al (2009) Mechanical characterization of a bituminous mix under quasi-static and high-strain rate loading. Constr Build Mater 23:1795–1802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang F Lim, CH, Soh TB (2010) Explosive testing, numerical and analytical modelling of a modular blast wall system. The 3rd international conference on design and analysis of protective structures. Singapore: 392–401Google Scholar
  39. Wang S (2011) Experimental and numercial studies on behavior of plain and fiber-reinforced high strength concrete subjected to high strain rate loading. Ph.D Thesis, National University of SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  40. Whirley RG, Engelmann BE (1992) Slidesurfaces with adaptive new definitions (sand) for transient analysis. winter annual meeting of the american society of mechanical engineers Anaheim, California ASME: 65–71Google Scholar
  41. Wright A, French M (2008) The response of carbon fibre composites to blast loading via the Europa CAFV programme. J Mater Sci 43:6619–6629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Xiao H (2009) Yielding and failure of cement treated soil. Ph.D Thesis, National University of SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhou XQ, Hao H (2008) Modelling of compressive behaviour of concrete-like materials. Int J Solids Struct 45:4648–4661CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jun Wu
    • 1
  • Hao Wu
    • 2
  • Hong Wei Andy Tan
    • 3
  • Soon Hoe Chew
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Urban Rail TransportationShanghai University of Engineering ScienceShanghaiChina
  2. 2.College of Civil EngineeringTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Land Transport AuthoritySingaporeSingapore
  4. 4.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations