Advertisement

The Thumb pp 321-330 | Cite as

Non-microsurgical Reconstruction

  • Sae Hwi Ki
Chapter

Abstract

The thumb is a very important part that is responsible about 40% of the functionality of the hand. The surgeon should be considered important aims for thumb reconstruction: (1) the appropriate length of the thumb, (2) stability, (3) the proper position for opposition, (4) the sense, (5) proper mobility and strength. Recently, with advance in microsurgical procedure, various microsurgical method of the thumb reconstruction, which is considered as the first choice for the thumb reconstruction has shown excellent results. However, if there are improper conditions such as, the patient’s age and poor vascular condition, improper microsurgical instruments with a microscope, and a microsurgical non-trained surgeon, because it is very are difficult to perform the microsurgical thumb reconstruction, hand surgeons have to know and get used to. Without microsurgical reconstruction technique, the surgeon should consider there are many methods and many factors to reconstruct the thumb, according to the remaining length of the thumb, function of the thenar muscle, carpometacarpal joint function, and others.

Keywords

Thumb Reconstruction Non-microsurgical method 

References

  1. 1.
    Del Piñal F, Pennazzato D, Urrutia E. Primary thumb reconstruction in a mutilated hand. Hand Clin. 2016;32(4):519–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Littler JW. Finger pollicization for traumatic loss. In: McCarthy J, editor. Plastic surgery: the hand, vol. 8. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1990. p. 5135–52.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vedder NB, Friedrich JB. Thumb reconstruction: nonmicrosurgical techniques. In: Chang J, Neligan PC, editors. Plastic surgery, vol. 6. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2013. p. 282–94.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wei FC, El-Gammal TA, Lin CH, Chuang CC, Chen HC, Chen SH. Metacarpal hand: classification and guidelines for microsurgical reconstruction with toe transplants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:122–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Michon J, Merle M, Bouchon Y, Foucher G. Functional comparison between pollicization and toe-to-hand transfer for thumb reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1984;1(2):103–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lister G. The choice of procedure following thumb amputation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;195:45–51.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Campbell-Reid DA, McGrouther DA. Pollicization. In: Campbell-Reid DA, McGrouther DA, editors. Surgery of the thumb. London: Butterworths; 1986. p. 92–105.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muzaffar AR, Chao JJ, Friedrich JB. Posttraumatic thumb reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:103–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lazar A, Abimelec P, Dumontier C. Full thickness skin graft for nail unit reconstruction. J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30(2):194–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foucher G, Braun JB. A new island flap transfer from the dorsum of the index to the thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63:344–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muyldermans T, Hielmer R. First dorsal metacarpal artery flap for thumb reconstruction; a retrospective clinical study. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2009;4(1):27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    El-Khatib HA. Clinical experiences with extended first dorsal metacarpal artery island flap for thumb reconstruction. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1998;23:647–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Segu SS, Athavale SN, Maniunath P. Osteoplastic reconstruction for post traumatic thumb amputations around metacarpophalangeal joint. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(8):11–3.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Matev IB. Thumb reconstruction through metacarpal bone lengthening. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1980;5(5):482–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Littler JW. Neurovascular skin island transfer in reconstructive hand surgery. Edinburgh: E&S Livingstone; 1960.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bravo CJ, Horton T, Moran SL, Shin AY. Traumatized index finger pollicization for thumb reconstruction. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2008;33:257–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pet MA, Ko JH, Vedder NB. Reconstruction of the traumatized thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:1235–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ozer K. Pollicization of the second metacarpal based on dorsal metacarpal arteries. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2016;41(9):317–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Friedrich JB, Vedder NB. Thumb Reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2011;38:697–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zimmerman R, Sailer R, Pechlaner S, Gabl M. Functional outcome with special attention to the DASH questionnaire following callus distraction and phalangization of the thumb after traumatic amputation in the middle one third. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003;123(10):521–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Amir H, Taghinia AH, Upton J. Index finger pollicization. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2011;36:333–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Graham D, Bhardwaj P, Sabapathy SR. Secondary thumb reconstruction in a mutilated hand. Hand Clin. 2016;32(4):533–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brunelli G, Brunelli G. Reconstruction of traumatic absence of the thumb in the adult by pollicization. Hand Clin. 1992;8(1):41–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sae Hwi Ki
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryInha University HospitalIncheonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations