Advertisement

History of “Making a Thumb”

  • Suk Joon Oh
Chapter

Abstract

The thumb plays an important role in the hand function. Routine work related to pinch, grip, grasp, and precision handling can be easily accomplished with opposable thumb.

Attempts to restore thumb function were recorded as early as 1874, when Huguier (Arch Gen Med. 1, 78, 1874) reported on the phalangization of the thumb metacarpal. In 1900, Nicoladoni (Arch Klin Chir. 61, 606–14, 1900) described a reconstruction procedure following traumatic amputation of the thumb in which a staged, pedicled transfer of the great toe was performed.

The causes of thumb deficiency are traumatic loss and congenital anomalies. In the late nineteenth century, three basic methods of thumb restoration were established for various levels of amputation. There were digital transplantation, variable reconstruction, and use of hand structures such as phalangization and pollicization.

Congenital thumb anomalies, such as duplication, hypoplasia, and agenesis, are common and have a significant impact on the important functional role of the thumb. In the last century, they were classified and reconstructed with adequate variable techniques.

Keywords

History Thumb surgery Phalangization Digital transplantation Pollicization 

References

  1. 1.
    Huguier PC. Du remplacement du pouce par son metacarpien, par l’agrandissement du premier espace interosseux. Arch Gen Med. 1874;1:78.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Littler JW. On making a thumb: one hundred years of surgical effort. J Hand Surg Am. 1976;1(1):35–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nicoladoni C. Daumenplastik und organischer Ersatz der Fingerspitze (Anticheiroplastik und Daktyloplstik). Arch Klin Chir. 1900;61:606–14.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buncke HJ Jr, Buncke CM, Schulz WP. Immediate Nicoladoni procedure in the Rhesus monkey, or hallux-to-hand transplantation, utilising microminiature vascular anastomoses. Br J Plast Surg. 1966;19(4):332–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cobbett JR. Free digital transfer. Report of a case of transfer of a great toe to replace an amputated thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1969;51(4):677–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Graham DJ, Venkatramani H, Sabapathy SR. Current reconstruction options for traumatic thumb loss. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2016;41:1159–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Littler JW. Reconstruction of the thumb in traumatic loss. In: Converse JM, editor. Reconstructive plastic surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1977. p. 3352.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lister G. The choice of procedure following thumb amputation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;195:45–51.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moberg E. Aspects of sensation in reconstructive surgery of the upper extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964;46:817–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Littler JW. Neurovascular pedicle transfer of tissue in reconstructive surgery of the hand. J Bone Joint Surg. 1956;38A:917.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Woo SH, Lee GJ, Kim KC, et al. Immediate partial great toe transfer for the reconstruction of composite defects of the distal thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(6):1906–15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Piñal F, Moraleda E, de Piero HG, Ruas J, Galindo C. Onycho-osteo-cutaneous defects of the thumb reconstructed by partial hallux transfer. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2014;39(1):29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Foucher G, Khouri RK. Digital reconstruction with island flaps. Clin Plast Surg. 1997;24(1):1–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gurdin M, Pangman JW. The repair of surface defects of fingers by trans-digital flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1950;5:368–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoskins DH. The versatile cross-finger pedicle flap. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1960;42:261–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Costa H, Soutar DS. The distally based island posterior interosseous flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1988;41(3):221–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Groenevelt F, Schoorl R. The reversed forearm flap using scarred skin in hand reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1985;38(3):398–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harii K, Omori K, Torii S, Murakami F, Kasai Y. Free groin skin flaps. Br J Plast Surg. 1975;28(4):225–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oh SJ, Koh SH, Chung CH. Wide thumb and the first web reconstruction using a neurovascularised instep free flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:1565–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ivy RH. Who originated the Z-plasty? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;41(1):67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Woolf RM, Broadbent TR. The four flap Z-plasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1972;49(1):48–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marble K, Fudem G. First web space release with the dorsal hand rotation flap: closing the donor site. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;35(1):83–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Woo SH, Choi BC, Oh SJ, Seul JH. Classification of the first web space free flap of the foot and its applications in reconstruction of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:508–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McGregor IA, Jackson IT. The groin flaps. Br J Plast Surg. 1972;25(1):3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kelleher JC, Sullivan JG, Baibak GJ, Dean RK. “On-top plasty” for amputated fingers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;42(3):242–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Matev IB. Thumb reconstruction through metacarpal bone lengthening. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1980;5(5):482–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yim K, Wei FC, Lin C. A comparison between primary and secondary toe-to-hand transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(1):107–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wei FC, Chen HC, Chuang CC, Noordhoff MS. Reconstruction of the thumb with a trimmed-toe transfer technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82:506–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morrison WA, O’Brien BM, MacLeod AM. Thumb reconstruction with a free neurovascular wrap-around flap from the big toe. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1980;5(6):575–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Biemer E. Thumb replacement by transplantation of the second toe. Handchirugie. 1981;13(1–2):31–5.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    McGregor I, Simonetta C. Reconstruction of thumb by composite bone-skin flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1964;17:37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Noesske K. Uber den plastischen ersatz von ganz oder teilweise verlorene fingern, insbesondere des daumens, und iiber handtellerplastik. Munch Med Wochenschr. 1909;56:1403.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pierce GW. Reconstruction of thumb after total loss. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1927;45:825.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shepelmann: Plastischer ersatz bei totaldefekt des rechten daumens. Z Orthop Chir. 34:1914; 35:1916; 39:1919.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Albee F. Synthetic transplantation of tissue to form a new finger with restoration of the function of the hand. Ann Surg. 1919;69:379.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Eo SR, Kim YS, Kim JYS, Oh SJ. The Versatility of the dorsalis pedis compound free flap in hand reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;61:157–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Moberg E. Discussion of paper, in Brooks, D.: Nerve grafting in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1955;37:299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Oh SJ, Koh SH, Chung CH. Twin digital and in-step neurovascularised free flap for reconstruction of the degloved mutilated hand. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:1853–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gosset J. La Pollicisation de L’index (technique chirurgicale). J Chir (Paris). 1949;65:403–11.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Iselin M. Reconstruction of the thumb. Surgery. 1937;2:619.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hilgenfeldt 0. Operativer daumenersatz, Stuttgart, 1950, F ManagementGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dautel G. Strategy for congenital thumb differences in paediatric patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103:125–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wassel HD. The results of surgery for polydactyly of the thumb. A review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1969;64:175–93.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dautel G, Barbary S. Duplications du pouce. Chir Main. 2008;27(Suppl. 1):S82–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Dobyns JH, Lipscomb PR, Cooney WP. Management of thumb duplication. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;195:26–44.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tada K, Yonenobu K, Tsuyuguchi Y, Kawai H, Egawa T. Duplication of the thumb. A retrospective review of two hundred and thirty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1983;65:584–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bilhaut M. Guerison d’un pouce bifide par un nouveau procede.operatoire. Congrés Francais de. Chirurgie. 1889;4:576–80.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tonkin MA, Bulstrode NW. The Bilhaut-Cloquet procedure for Wassel types III, IV and VII thumb duplication. J Hand Surg Eur. 2007;32:684–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Müller W. Die angeborenen Fehlbildungen der menschlichen Hand. Leipzig: Thieme; 1937.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Blauth W. Der hypoplastische Daumen. Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1967;62:225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Strauch B. Dorsal thumb flap for release of adduction contracture of the first web space. Bull Hosp Joint Dis. 1975;36(1):34–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Camitz H. Über die beHandlung der Opposition-lähmung. Acta Chir Scand. 1929;65:77.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Royle NO. An operation for paralysis of the intrinsic muscles of the thumb. JAMA. 1938;111:612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Huber E. Hilfsoperation bei Medianuslahmung. Dtsch Z Chir. 1921;162:271–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lister G. The hand: diagnosis and indications. 2nd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1984. p. 312–51.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Matthews D. Congenital absence of functioning thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1960;26:487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zancolli E. Transplantation of the index finger in congenital absence of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1960;42:658.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Buck-Gramcko D. Pollicization of the index finger method and results in aplasia and hypoplasia of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53:1605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suk Joon Oh
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Hallym University College of MedicineChuncheonSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Plastic and Burn Reconstructive SurgeryBestian Seoul HospitalSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations