Advertisement

The Conceptualisation of austerity in the Portuguese, Spanish and Irish Press

  • Augusto Soares da SilvaEmail author
  • Maria Josep Cuenca
  • Manuela Romano
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Cultural Linguistics book series (CL)

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to analyse the conceptualisation of austerity in three different European cultures by identifying metaphorical expressions used in one representative newspaper of the Portuguese, the Spanish and the Irish press between 2011 and 2012. The metaphors were identified by searching for three keywords from the field of economy and politics (austeridade-austeridad-austerity, corte-recorte-cut and dívida-deuda-debt) and were then classified according to the type of schema they instantiate, namely, propositional schema, image schema or event schema. Assuming the general framework of Cultural Linguistics and corpus-based and discourse-based approaches to conceptual metaphor, the study highlights how metaphor can be a powerful conceptual and discourse strategy to frame economic, political and social issues and to serve emotional and ideological purposes. Through metaphor, the strongly mediatised political and economic debate about austerity measures and policies becomes effectively persuasive and manipulative. The analysis shows that the newspapers resort to the same schemas and metaphors. However, the differences in the frequency of the types of schema and the specific metaphors suggest that different socio-historical and cultural conceptualisations result in the different types and rates of metaphors in the three cultures under analysis, i.e. a deep conservative morality of self-discipline and punishment, in the case of Portugal; a strong sense of outrage against austerity measures and their creditors, in Spain; and the idea that the crisis and its effects were hitting the country but not as seriously as others, in Ireland.

Keywords

Cultural linguistics Conceptual metaphor Cultural conceptualisation Propositional schemas Image schemas Event schemas Austerity Portugal Spain Ireland 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Augoustinos, M., Walker, I., & Donaghue, N. (2006). Social cognition: An integrated introduction. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Barlow, M. (2000). Usage, blends, and grammar. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 315–345). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Bernárdez, E. (1995). Teoría y epistemología del texto. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
  4. Bernárdez, E. (2008a). El lenguaje como cultura. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
  5. Bernárdez, E. (2008b). Collective cognition and individual activity: Variation, language and culture. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke, & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language, and mind. Vol. 2. Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 137–166). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  6. Bernárdez, E. (2016). From butchers and surgeons to the linguistic method. On language and cognition as supraindividual phenomena. In M. Romano & M. D. Porto (Eds.), Exploring discourse strategies in socio-cognitive interaction: A multimodal and cross-linguistic approach (pp. 21–38). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  7. Brandt, L., & Brandt, P. A. (2005). Making sense of a blend. A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 216–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric. The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charteris-Black, J. (2013). What is the purpose of metaphor in political discourse? An answer from critical metaphor analysis. In A. Soares da Silva, C. Martins, L. Magalhães, & M. Gonçalves (Eds.), Comunicação política e económica: Dimensões cognitivas e discursivas (pp. 69–87). Braga: Aletheia, Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.Google Scholar
  11. Chilton, P. (1996). Security metaphors, cold war discourse from containment to common European home. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  12. Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Díaz-Vera, J. (2015). Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures: Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dirven, R., Polzenhagen, F., & Wolf, H. G. (2007). Cognitive linguistics, ideology, and critical discourse analysis. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 1222–1240). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Frank, R. M. (2008). The language-organism-species analogy: A complex adaptative systems approach to shifting perspectives on “language”. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language and mind. Vol 2. Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 215—262). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  16. Frank, R. M. (2015). Cultural linguistics and the future agenda for research on language and culture. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 493–512). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Frank, R. M., Dirven, R., Ziemke, T., & Bernárdez, E. (Eds.), (2008). Body, language, and mind. Vol 2. Sociocultural situatedness. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  18. Geeraerts, D. (2006). Methodology in cognitive linguistics. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics. Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 21–49). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  19. Geeraerts, D., & Grondelaers, S. (1995). Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In J. R. Taylor & R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp. 153–179). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  20. Geeraerts, D., Grondelaers, S., & Bakema, P. (1994). The structure of lexical variation. Meaning, naming, and context. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  21. Geeraerts, D., Kristiansen, G., & Peirsman, Y. (Eds.). (2010). Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  22. Glynn, D., & Fischer, K. (Eds.). (2010). Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  23. Hart, C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hart, C. (2014). Discourse, grammar and ideology: Functional and cognitive perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  25. Hart, C. (2015). Discourse. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 322–346). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  26. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Koller, V. (2004). Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koller, V. (2013). Socio-cognitive approaches to corporate discourse. In A. Soares da Silva, C. Martins, L. Magalhães, & M. Gonçalves (Eds.), Comunicação política e económica: Dimensões cognitivas e discursivas (pp. 89–103). Braga: Aletheia, Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.Google Scholar
  29. Koller, V. (2014). Cognitive linguistics and ideology. In J. Littlemore & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics (pp. 234–252). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  30. Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor. A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kövecses, Z. (2009). The effect of context on the use of metaphor in discourse. Iberica, 17, 11–24.Google Scholar
  32. Kövecses, Z. (2010). A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 663–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kristiansen, G., & Dirven, R. (Eds.). (2008). Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  35. Kristiansen, G., Dirven, R., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (Eds.). (2006). Applications of cognitive linguistics: Foundations and fields of application. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  36. Kristiansen, G., & Geeraerts, D. (2013). Contexts and usage in cognitive sociolinguistics. Journal of Pragmatics, 52, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics. How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an Elephant! Know your values and frame the debate: The essential guide for progressives. New York: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
  39. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  41. Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Langacker, R. (1994). Culture, cognition, and grammar. In M. Pütz (Ed.), Language contact and language conflict (pp. 25–53). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Langacker, R. (2001). Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), 143–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lindblom, J., & Ziemke, T. (2002). Social situatedness of natural and artificial intelligence: Vigotsky and beyond. Adaptive Behaviour, 11(2), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moreno Lara, M. A. (2008). La metáfora en el lenguaje político de la prensa americana. Comares: Modelos cognitivos y formación de significado. Granada.Google Scholar
  46. Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse. Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Musolff, A., & Zinken, J. (Eds.). (2009). Metaphor and discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  48. Palmer, G. B. (1996). Towards a theory of cultural linguistics. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
  49. Pishwa, H. (Ed.). (2009). Language and social cognition. Expression of the social mind. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  50. Pütz, M., Robinson, J. A., & Reif, M. (Eds.). (2014). Cognitive sociolinguistics: Social and cultural variation in cognition and language use. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  51. Quinn, N. (1987). Convergent evidence for a cultural model of American marriage. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 173–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Quinn, N., & Holland, D. (Eds.). (1987). Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Reif, M., Robinson, J. A., & Pütz, M. (Eds.). (2013). Variation in language and language use. Linguistic, socio-cultural and cognitive perspectives. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  54. Rojo López, A. M., & Orts Llopis, M. A. (2010). Metaphorical pattern analysis in financial texts: Framing the crisis in positive or negative metaphorical terms. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 3300–3313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Romano, M., & Porto, M. D. (2016). Exploring discourse strategies in socio-cognitive interaction: A multimodal and cross-linguistic approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  56. Sardinha, T. B. (2011). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 11(2), 329–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Shank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale/New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  59. Sharifian, F. (2008). Distributed, emergent cultural cognition, conceptualization and language. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke, & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language and mind. Vol. 2. Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 109–136). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  60. Sharifian, F. (2009). On collective cognition and language. In H. Pishwa (Ed.), Language and social cognition: Expression of the social mind (pp. 163–180). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  61. Sharifian, F. (2011). Cultural conceptualizations and language: Theoretical framework and applications. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sharifian, F. (2015). Cultural linguistics. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 473–492). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Sharifian, F. (2017). Cultural linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  64. Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 53–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Soares da Silva, A. (2006). O mundo dos sentidos em português: Polissemia, semântica e cognição [The world of senses in Portuguese: Polysemy, semantics and cognition]. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
  66. Soares da Silva, A. (2013). O que sabemos sobre a crise económica, pela metáfora. Conceptualizações metafóricas da crise na imprensa portuguesa [What we know about the economic crisis through metaphor. Metaphorical conceptualizations of the crisis in the Portuguese press]. Revista Media & Jornalismo, 23(1), 11–34.Google Scholar
  67. Soares da Silva, A. (2016). The persuasive (and manipulative) power of metaphor in ‘austerity’ discourse: A corpus-based analysis of embodied and moral metaphors of austerity in the Portuguese Press. In M. Romano & M. D. Porto (Eds.), Exploring discourse strategies in socio-cognitive interaction: A multimodal and cross-linguistic approach (pp. 79–108). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  68. Steen, G. J. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor—Now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Steen, G. J. (2014). The cognitive-linguistic revolution in metaphor studies. In J. Littlemore & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics (pp. 117–142). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  70. Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 1–16). Berlin/NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  71. Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2006). Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Vereza, S. C. (2007). Metáfora e argumentação: Uma abordagem cognitivo-discursiva [Metaphor and argumentation: A cognitive-discursive approach]. Linguagem em (Dis)curso, 7(3), 487–506.Google Scholar
  73. Vereza, S. C. (2013). Discourse, cognition and figurative language: Exploring metaphors in political editorials. In A. Soares da Silva, C. Martins, L. Magalhães, & M. Gonçalves (Eds.), Comunicação política e económica: Dimensões cognitivas e discursivas (pp. 395–406). Braga: Aletheia, Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia da Universidade Católica Portuguesa.Google Scholar
  74. Zlatev, J. (1997). Situated embodiment: Studies in the emergence of spatial meaning. Stockholm: Gotab.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Augusto Soares da Silva
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maria Josep Cuenca
    • 2
  • Manuela Romano
    • 3
  1. 1.Catholic University of PortugalBragaPortugal
  2. 2.University of ValenciaValenciaSpain
  3. 3.Universidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options