Advertisement

Cognitive Evaluation in Patients with Vascular Cognitive Impairment

  • Jae-Sung LimEmail author
Chapter
  • 25 Downloads
Part of the Stroke Revisited book series (STROREV)

Abstract

Cognitive evaluation in patients with vascular cognitive impairment differs in some aspects from those of other neurodegenerative patients with dementia. Appropriate and sensitive evaluation tools should be used to assess the cognitive function, as there are differences in the cognitive domains initially affected by the disease. In addition, some patients with vascular cognitive impairment have accompanying physical disabilities, such as unilateral paralysis or a visual field defect, so it is necessary for the examiner to check carefully whether the test results are purely due to a decline in cognitive function or due to a physical impairment. In this chapter, we will discuss the various cognitive function assessment methods currently in use for patients with vascular cognitive impairment and discuss their advantages and disadvantages. In addition, we will briefly discuss the neuropsychological construct in patients with vascular cognitive impairment and the characteristics of longitudinal cognitive changes.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT) (No.2017R1C1B5018132).

References

  1. 1.
    Sachdev PS, Lo JW, Crawford JD, et al. STROKOG (stroke and cognition consortium): an international consortium to examine the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neurocognitive disorders in relation to cerebrovascular disease. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2017;7:11–23.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eskes GA, Lanctot KL, Herrmann N, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: mood, cognition and fatigue following stroke practice guidelines, update 2015. Int J Stroke. 2015;10(7):1130–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hachinski V, Iadecola C, Petersen RC, et al. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards. Stroke. 2006;37(9):2220–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lim JS, Oh MS, Lee JH, et al. Prediction of post-stroke dementia using NINDS-CSN 5-minute neuropsychology protocol in acute stroke. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017;29(5):777–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Godefroy O, Gibbons L, Diouf M, et al. Validation of an integrated method for determining cognitive ability: implications for routine assessments and clinical trials. Cortex. 2014;54:51–62. Epub 2014/03/19PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wong A, Law LS, Liu W, et al. Montreal cognitive assessment: one cutoff never fits all. Stroke. 2015;46(12):3547–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sachdev P, Kalaria R, O’Brien J, et al. Diagnostic criteria for vascular cognitive disorders: a VASCOG statement. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2014;28(3):206–18.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wind AW, Schellevis FG, Van Staveren G, et al. Limitations of the Mini-Mental State Examination in diagnosing dementia in general practice. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1997;12(1):101–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40(9):922–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kang Y, Park J, Yu KH, et al. A reliability, validity, and normative study of the Korean-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (K-MoCA) as an instrument for screening of vascular cognitive impairment. Korean J Clin Psychol. 2009;28(2):549–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pendlebury ST, Mariz J, Bull L, et al. MoCA, ACE-R, and MMSE versus the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network Vascular Cognitive Impairment Harmonization Standards Neuropsychological Battery after TIA and stroke. Stroke. 2012;43(2):464–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wong A, Nyenhuis D, Black SE, et al. Montreal Cognitive Assessment 5-minute protocol is a brief, valid, reliable, and feasible cognitive screen for telephone administration. Stroke. 2015;46(4):1059–64.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pendlebury ST, Chen PJ, Welch SJ, et al. Methodological factors in determining risk of dementia after transient ischemic attack and stroke: (II) effect of attrition on follow-up. Stroke. 2015;46(6):1494–500.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koski L. Validity and applications of the Montreal cognitive assessment for the assessment of vascular cognitive impairment. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;36(1):6–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Julayanont P, Brousseau M, Chertkow H, et al. Montreal Cognitive Assessment Memory Index Score (MoCA-MIS) as a predictor of conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(4):679–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mioshi E, Dawson K, Mitchell J, et al. The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;21(11):1078–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Imai Y, Hasegawa K. The revised Hasegawa’s Dementia Scale (HDS-R): evaluation of its usefulness as a screening test for dementia. J Hong Kong Coll Psychiatr. 1994;4:20–4.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jarvenpaa T, Rinne JO, Raiha I, et al. Characteristics of two telephone screens for cognitive impairment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2002;13(3):149–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barber M, Stott DJ. Validity of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) in post-stroke subjects. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004;19(1):75–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gorelick PB, Scuteri A, Black SE, et al. Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42(9):2672–713.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen X, Wong A, Ye R, et al. Validation of NINDS-CSN neuropsychological battery for vascular cognitive impairment in Chinese stroke patients. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Godefroy O, Leclercq C, Roussel M, et al. French adaptation of the vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards: the GRECOG-VASC study. Int J Stroke. 2012;7(4):362–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yu KH, Cho SJ, Oh MS, et al. Cognitive impairment evaluated with Vascular Cognitive Impairment Harmonization Standards in a multicenter prospective stroke cohort in Korea. Stroke. 2013;44(3):786–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dichgans M, Leys D. Vascular cognitive impairment. Circ Res. 2017;120(3):573–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jorm AF. A short form of the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE): development and cross-validation. Psychol Med. 1994;24(1):145–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982;17(1):37–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barbay M, Taillia H, Nedelec-Ciceri C, et al. Prevalence of poststroke neurocognitive disorders using National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network, VASCOG criteria (vascular behavioral and cognitive disorders), and optimized criteria of cognitive deficit. Stroke. 2018;49(5):1141–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Levine DA, Galecki AT, Langa KM, et al. Trajectory of cognitive decline after incident stroke. JAMA. 2015;314(1):41–51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    del Ser T, Barba R, Morin MM, et al. Evolution of cognitive impairment after stroke and risk factors for delayed progression. Stroke. 2005;36(12):2670–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lim JS, Noh M, Kim BJ, et al. A methodological perspective on the longitudinal cognitive change after stroke. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;44(5–6):311–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang J, Logovinsky V, Hendrix SB, et al. ADCOMS: a composite clinical outcome for prodromal Alzheimer’s disease trials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(9):993–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Diener HC, Sacco RL, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of aspirin plus extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel and telmisartan on disability and cognitive function after recurrent stroke in patients with ischaemic stroke in the Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes (PRoFESS) trial: a double-blind, active and placebo-controlled study. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(10):875–84.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pearce LA, McClure LA, Anderson DC, et al. Effects of long-term blood pressure lowering and dual antiplatelet treatment on cognitive function in patients with recent lacunar stroke: a secondary analysis from the SPS3 randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(12):1177–85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hicks SL, Sharma R, Khan AN, et al. An eye-tracking version of the trail-making test. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e84061.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Oliveira CR, Lopes Filho BJ, Sugarman MA, et al. Development and feasibility of a virtual reality task for the cognitive assessment of older adults: the ECO-VR. Span J Psychol. 2016;19:E95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Oliveira CR, Lopes Filho BJP, Esteves CS, et al. Neuropsychological assessment of older adults with virtual reality: association of age, schooling, and general cognitive status. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1085.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurologyHallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym Neurological Institute, Hallym University College of MedicineAnyang-siSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations