Advertisement

“Humanity” Within the Contemporary Context of International Law Dealing with Crimes Against Humanity

  • Rustam AtadjanovEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Criminal Justice Series book series (ICJS, volume 22)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the existing legal theories of crimes against humanity. It breaks the analytical classification into two sub-categories (conceptual and normative) and further proceeds to laying out the conceptual grounds for the proposed theory of humanness. The chapter also explains what the expression “a theory of crimes against humanity” means, i.e., it tries to clarify what key components such a theory has to possess. In this case, those components would be the theory’s “purpose” and “justification”. This chapter furthermore looks at how the relevant criminal law doctrines were or were not used in the considered theoretical normative descriptions, and suggests in which direction they would be better off going, with a view to providing a more comprehensive view. At the end the chapter offers a preliminary assessment of the relationship, or correlation, between the constituent elements of humanness and the individual acts of crimes against humanity as well as the so-called “contextual element” as established in the Rome Statute of the ICC.

Keywords

Theories of crimes against humanity Conceptual and normative questions Theory of humanness Elements of humanness Individual acts Contextual element 

References

  1. Ambos K (2014) Treatise on ICL, Vol. II. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Arendt H (1977) Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Aristotle (2004) Nicomachean ethics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Assembly of States Parties (2002) Official Records of the 1st session, New York, 3–10 September 2002. https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/Documents/ElementsOfCrimesEng.pdf. Accessed 26 November 2018
  5. Atadjanov R (2016) Book review of Norman Geras’ “Crimes against humanity”: Birth of a concept. Journal of International Criminal Justice 14(1):227–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bassiouni C (2005) The legislative history of the International Criminal Court: Introduction, analysis and integrated text, Vol. I. Transnational Publishers, Ardsley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Bassiouni C (2011) Crimes against humanity: Historical evolution and contemporary application. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Bauman R (2000) Human rights in Ancient Rome. Routledge, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Broomhall B (2004) International justice and the International Criminal Court: Between sovereignty and the rule of law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassese A (2003) ICL, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Corrias L (2016) Crimes against humanity, dehumanization and rehumanization: Reading the case of Duch with Hannah Arendt. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 2:351–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cryer R et al (2010) An introduction to ICL and procedure, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. deGuzman M (2011) Crimes against humanity. In: Schabas W, Bernaz N (eds) Routledge Handbook of ICL. Routledge, London, New York, pp. 121–137Google Scholar
  14. Descartes R (1988) Selected philosophical writings, rev. edn. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Dubler (2008) What is in a name? A theory of crimes against humanity. Australian International Law Journal 15:85Google Scholar
  16. Geras N (2011) Crimes against humanity: Birth of a concept. Manchester University Press, Manchester/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gierhake K (2005) Begründung des Völkerstrafrechts auf der Grundlage der Kantischen Rechtslehre. Duncker and Humblot, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  18. Hauser M (2009) Origin of the mind. Scientific American 3:301Google Scholar
  19. International Military Tribunal (1947) Trial of the major war criminals before the International Military Tribunal, 14 November 1945 – 1 October 1946, Vol. 5. International Military Tribunal, NurembergGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuschnik B (2008) Deutscher Sand im völkerstrafrechtlichen Getriebe? Eine Betrachtung des §153f StPO im Lichte des in §1 VStGB festgeschriebenen Weltrechtsprinzips. Journal of International Law of Peace and Armed Conflict 21:230–237Google Scholar
  21. Kuschnik B (2010) Humaneness, humankind and crimes against humanity. Goettingen Journal of International Law 2:501–530Google Scholar
  22. Lesaffer R (2011) Law and history: Law between past and present. In: van Klink B, Taekema S (eds) Law and method: Interdisciplinary research into law. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp. 133–152Google Scholar
  23. Luban D (2004) A theory of crimes against humanity. Yale Journal of International Law 29:85–167Google Scholar
  24. Macleod C (2010) Towards a philosophical account of crimes against humanity. European Journal of International Law 21(2):281–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marshall J (2009) Personal freedom through human rights law? Autonomy, identity and integrity under the European Convention of Human Rights. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  26. May L (2005) Crimes against humanity: A normative account. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. May L et al (2006) Symposium: Crimes against humanity. 20 Ethics and International Affairs 20:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nussbaum M (1999) Sex and social justice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Oberleitner G (2015) Human rights in armed conflict: Law, practice, policy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Pictet J (1979) The fundamental principles of the Red Cross. Commentary. International Review of the Red Cross 19:130–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Radbruch G (1947) Zur Diskussion über die Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20800911.pdf. Accessed 26 November 2018
  32. Renzo M (2010) A criticism of the international harm principle. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4:267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Renzo (2012) Crimes against humanity and the limits of ICL. Law and Philosophy 31(4):443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Robertson G (2002) Crimes against humanity. The struggle for global justice, 2nd edn. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Rodley N, Pollard M (2009) The treatment of prisoners under international law, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Sayapin S (2017) Torture. In: Beauvallet O (ed), Dictionnaire encyclopédique de la justice pénale internationale. Berger Levrault, Boulogne-Billancourt, pp. 926–927Google Scholar
  37. Schabas W (2008) State policy as an element of international crimes. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 98(3):953Google Scholar
  38. Schwelb E (1946) Crimes against humanity. British Yearbook of International Law 23:178Google Scholar
  39. Tochilovsky V (2018) Crimes against “Humaneness”? The Russian interpretation of crimes against humanity. JICJ  https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqy059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. United Nations General Assembly (1948) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly at its 183rd plenary session on 10 December 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. A/RES/217(III)AGoogle Scholar
  41. Vernon R (2002) What is a crime against humanity? Journal of Political Philosophy 10:231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vernon R (2013) Crime against humanity: A defense of the “subsidiarity” view. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 26:229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Werle G, Jessberger F (2014) Principles of ICL, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  44. Zysset A (2016) Refining the structure and revisiting the relevant jurisdiction of crimes against humanity. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 29:245CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the author 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations