Agile Tyre Mobility: Observation and Control in Severe Terrain Environments

  • V. Vantsevich
  • D. Gorsich
  • A. Lozynskyy
  • L. Demkiv
  • T. Borovets
  • S. Klos
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics book series (NAPSB)


This research study develops fundamentals for a new ground vehicle technology to radically improve and protect off-road vehicle mobility by providing agile (fast, exact and pre-emptive) responses and advanced mobility controls in severe terrain conditions.

The current framework of terrain vehicle mobility that estimates a vehicle capability “to go through” or “not to go through” the given terrain conditions cannot provide an analytical basis for novel system design solutions. Indeed, modern traction control and other mobility related electronic control systems possess control response time within the range of 100–120 milliseconds and greater. With this response time, the actual control occurs after the vehicle has reached a critical motion situation, e.g., a wheel(s) is/are spinning and the vehicle is already losing its mobility. In this study, the developed methods allowed for estimating tyre mobility and controlling tyre motion before the tyre starts spinning. As shown in the conducted analysis, the response time, which occurs within the longitudinal tyre relaxation time constant of 40–60 ms, is sufficient for a tyre to avoid spinning and to maintain its required mobility.

Most common traditional approaches to observation of data supplied by virtual sensors were simulated and improved by means of machine learning algorithms. Computational simulations of an one-wheel-locomotion module driven by an electric driveline system demonstrated a sufficient performance of the proposed observation method to estimate mobility margins of the module in real time.

A hybrid intelligent control algorithm was designed, in which reinforcement learning was used to fine-tune the parameters of a fuzzy logic controller. A new wheel mobility index was utilized as a cost function to guarantee a designed behavior of the locomotion module. A fuzzy corrector was additionally designed to take into account both the dynamic state of the system and the dynamics of the tyre-terrain interaction. The fuzzy corrector supports upper level controls of autonomous vehicle dynamics by decreasing tyre slippage on severe terrains.

Computer simulations testified both stability of the controller (due to utilization of fuzzy logic polynomial control) and its desired performance (due to application of reinforcement learning). The fine-tuned controller requires minimal online computations.

This paper provides an extended summary of the above-listed research studies. Further details can be found in publications referenced in the paper.


Agile terrain mobility Real-time observer and controller 



This study has been supported by a grant of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Programme: MYP SPS G5176 “Agile Tyre Mobility for Severe Terrain Environments”.


  1. 1.
    Vantsevich V, Gorsich D, Lozynskyy A, Demkiv L, Borovets T, Klos S (2019b) Reference torque history for sustainable mobility and energy efficiency under target velocity profiles. In: Proceedings of the ISTVS 15 th European-african regional conference, Prague, Czech Republic, September 9–11, 2019 (in print)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vantsevich VV, Lozynskyy A, Demkiv L, Holovach I (2017) Fuzzy logic control of agile dynamics of a wheel locomotion module, Dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks Vol 1: Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks (IAVSD 2017), 14–18 August 2017, Rockhampton, Queensland, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vantsevich VV, Lozynskyy A, Demkiv L, Klos S (2017a) A foundation for real-time tire mobility estimation and control. In: Joint 19th Iiternational & 14th european-african regional conference, Budapest. ISBN:978–1–942112-49-5Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vantsevich V, Lozynskyy A, Demkiv L (2017b) A wheel rotational velocity control strategy for an open-Link locomotion module. In: 19th international & 14th european-african regional conference of the ISTVSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vantsevich VV, Demkiv LI, Klos SR (2018) Analysis of tire relaxation constants for modeling vehicle traction performance and Handling. In ASME 2018 dynamic systems and control conference. American Society of Mechanical EngineersGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vantsevich V, Gorsich D, Lozynskyy A, Demkiv L, Klos S (2019d) A reinforcement-learning algorithm with relaxation time constant-based boundaries for real-time off-road traction control. The 26th iavsd international symposium on dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks (IAVSD), 12–16 August 2019, Gothenburg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vantsevich V, Gorsich D, Lozynskyy A, Demkiv L, Borovets T (2019a) State observers for terrain mobility controls: a technical analysis. In: IFToMM world congress on mechanism and machine science. Springer, Cham, pp 3681–3690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lozynskyy AO, Demkiv LI, Vantsevich VV, Borovets TV, Gorsich DJ (2019) An estimation accuracy of state observers under uncertain initial conditions. Math. Model. Comput. 6(2):320–332Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lozynskyy A, Demkiv L (2016) Application of dynamic systems family for synthesis of fuzzy control with account of non-linearities. Adv Electr Electron Eng 14(5):543–550Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paldan JR, Gray JP, Vantsevich VV (2015) Sensor signal limitations in wheel rotational kinematics estimation model. In: ASME 2015 dynamic systems and control conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp V003T45A001–V003T45A001Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Andreev AF, Kabanau V, Vantsevich V (2010) Driveline systems of ground vehicles: theory and design. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lozynskyy A, Vantsevitch V, Demkiv L (2018) Enhancement of dynamical characteristics of a fuzzy control system by using unstable subsystem. IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy SystemsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Vantsevich
    • 1
  • D. Gorsich
    • 2
  • A. Lozynskyy
    • 3
  • L. Demkiv
    • 3
  • T. Borovets
    • 3
  • S. Klos
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Army CCDC Ground Vehicle Systems CenterWarrenUSA
  3. 3.Lviv Polytechnic National UniversityLvivUkraine

Personalised recommendations