Advertisement

Assessment of the Evacuation Capacity of a Crowd, Including People with Disabilities

  • Mykola KhvorostEmail author
  • Karyna Danova
Conference paper
  • 25 Downloads
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Abstract

Vulnerability of population in the terrorist threat is the main idea of the article. Regardless of the threat source, the probability to rescue people of different ages, health conditions and other factors is different. The purpose of this study is to gather information, based to make managerial decisions in optimization of the protective measures for buildings, which can be referred to “soft targets”. The goal of optimization is to provide maximum opportunities for rescuing people with different evacuation capacity, taking into account the characteristics of individual groups. This will improve the level of safety of people’s staying in public premises.

Keywords

Soft targets Evacuation route Persons with disabilities 

References

  1. 1.
    Terrorism in Europe, Statistics & Facts Homepage, https://www.statista.com/statistics/738562/fatal-terrorist-attacks-in-the-eu/, last accessed 2018/08/22
  2. 2.
    The Global Terrorism Index 2017 (2017) Measuring and understanding the impact of terrorism, The Institute for Economics & Peace (IEP), from: http://visionofhumanity.org/app/uploads/2017/11/Global-Terrorism-Index-2017.pdf
  3. 3.
    The European Union’s Policies on Counter-Terrorism; Relevance, Coherence and Effectiveness: European Parliament (2017) Directorate General for Internal Policies, from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/583124/IPOL_STU(2017)583124_EN.pdf
  4. 4.
    Kalvach Z et al (2016) Basics of soft targets protection – guidelines. 2nd version. Soft Targets Protection Institute, z.ú, PragueGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kurdi A, Al-Megren H, Althunyan S, Almulifi RA (2018) Effect of exit placement on evacuation plans. Eur J Oper Res 269:749–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jing-jing L, Hong-ya Z (2018) A risk-based model of evacuation route optimization under fire. Process Eng 211:365–371Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qi-miao X, Jin-hui W, Peng-cheng W, Wei-li W, Yu J, JinGuo (2018) The optimization for location of building evacuation exits considering the uncertainty of occupant density using polynomial chaos expansion and genetic algorithm. Process Eng 211:818–829Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kasereka S, Kasoro N, Kyamakya K, Doungmo Goufo E-F, Chokki P, Yengo M (2018) Agent-based modelling and simulation for evacuation of people from a building in case of fire. Proc Comput Sci 130:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang X (2017) Study on rapid evacuation in high-rise buildings. Eng Sci Technol, Int J 20:1203–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu J, Kang J, Wang C (2018) A crowd route choice evacuation model in large indoor building spaces. Front Archit Res 7(2):135–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Souza JC, Brombilla DC (2014) Humanitarian logistics principles for emergency evacuation of places with many people. Proc – Soc Behav Sci 162:24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vorst H (2010) Evacuation models and disaster psychology. Process Eng 3:15–21Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li F, Chen S, Wang X, Feng F (2014) Pedestrian evacuation modeling and simulation on metro platforms considering panic impacts. Proc – Soc Behav Sci 138:314–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wanga J, Yan W, Zhi Y, Jiang J (2016) Investigation of the panic psychology and behaviors of evacuation crowds in subway emergencies. Process Eng 135:128–137Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhu K, Shi Q (2016) Experimental study on choice behavior of pedestrians during building evacuation. Process Eng 135:207–216Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kasereka S, Kasoro N, Kyamakya K, Goufo E-FD, Chokki A, Yengo M (2018) Agent-based modelling and simulation for evacuation of people from a building in case of fire. Proc – Comput Sci 130:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hofinger G, Zinke R, Künzer L (2014) Human factors in evacuation simulation, planning, and guidance. Transport Res Proc 2:603–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang G, Wu F, Si J, Zeng Q, Lin P (2018) The study of the impact of obstacle on the efficiency of evacuation under different competitive conditions. Process Eng 211:699–708Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gutierrez-Milla A, Borges F, Suppi R, Luque E (2015) Crowd evacuations SaaS: an ABM approach. Proc – Comput Sci 51:473–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    CFPA Europe Homepage, CFPA-E Guideline No 19:2009 F. Fire safety engineering concerning evacuation from buildings, http://www.cfpa-e.eu/wp-content/uploads/files/guidelines/CFPA_E_Guideline_No_19_2009.pdf, last accessed 2018/08/05
  21. 21.
    Ahn C, Kim J, Lee S (2016) An analysis of evacuation under fire situation in complex shopping center using evacuation simulation modeling. Proc – Soc Behav Sci 218:24–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions, Action Plan to support the protection of public spaces. Brussels, 18.10.2017 COM (2017) 612 final Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-security/20171018_action_plan_to_improve_the_protection_of_public_spaces_en.pdf, last accessed 2018/08/07
  23. 23.
    Cisek M, Kapalka M (2014) Evacuation route assessment model for optimization of evacuation in buildings with active dynamic signage system. Transport Res Proc 2:541–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in KharkivKharkivUkraine

Personalised recommendations