Advertisement

Advanced Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Behavior Structural Materials Including Dynamic Conditions of Fracture for Needs of Designing Protective Structures

  • Michal GrazkaEmail author
  • Leopold Kruszka
  • Wojciech Mocko
  • Maciej Klosak
Conference paper
  • 20 Downloads
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Abstract

The article presents the discussion of modern experimental and numerical techniques used to the design critical infrastructure protection structures. The article presents also the results of experimental researches on S235 steel sheet. The S235 steel sheets were tested using the Hopkinson Bar Technic and perforation tests. In researches were used 3D scanners and numerical controlled measuring machine for checking the final shape after the deformation. The article also presents the results of FEM analysis made using explicit solver. Full-scale CAD model was used in numeric calculations.

Keywords

Steel perforation Ballistic FEM analysis CNC measuring 

References

  1. 1.
    PWN (2018) Great Polish dictionaryGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Council Directive 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection, European Union (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sventekova E, Leitner B, Dvorak Z (2017) Transport critical infrastructure in Slovak republic. In: IMCIC 2017 – 8th International Multi-Conference on Complexity, Informatics and Cybernetics, Proceedings 2017-March, pp 212–215Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leitner B, Môcová L, Hromada M (2017) A new approach to identification of critical elements in railway infrastructure. Process Eng 187:143–149Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Figuli L, Kavický V, Picot S (2017) Analysis of the different approaches to protection of critical infrastructures in France and Slovakia. In: Lecture notes in mechanical engineering PartF11. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp 120–128Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manas P (2017) The protection of critical infrastructure objects – technical principles. In: Lecture notes in mechanical engineering PartF11. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp 239–248Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Loveček T, Velas A, Kampová K, Mariš L, Mózer V (2013) Cumulative probability of detecting an intruder by alarm systems. In: Proceedings – International Carnahan Conference on Security TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bedon C, Zhang X, Santos F, Honfi D, Kozłowski M, Arrigoni M, Figuli L, Lange D (2018) Performance of structural glass facades under extreme loads – design methods, existing research, current issues and trends. Constr Build Mater 163:921–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Figuli L, Jangl Š, Papán D (2016) Modelling and testing of blast effect on the structures. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 44(5):052051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    European Standard EN10025:2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Klosak M, Rusinek A, Bendarma A, Jankowiak T, Lodygowski T (2017) Experimental study of brass properties through perforation test using a thermal chamber for elevated temperatures. Latin Am J Solid Struct.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78254346
  12. 12.
    Moćko W, Janiszewski J, Radziejewska J, Grazka M (2015) Analysis of deformation history and damage initiation for 6082-T6 aluminium alloy loaded at classic and symmetric Taylor impact test conditions. Int J Impact Eng 75:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grazka M, Janiszewski J (2012) Identification of Johnson-Cook equation constants using finite element method. Eng Trans 60(3):215–223Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Panowicz R, Janiszewski J, Kochanowski K (2017) The influence of non-axisymmetric pulse shaper position on SHPB experimental data. J Theo Appl Mech (Poland) 56(3):873–886Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kruszka L, Janiszewski J (2015) Experimental analysis and constitutive modelling of steel of A-IIIN strength class. EPJ Web Conf 94:05007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leitner B, Lusková M, Dvořák Z, Sventekova E (2017) Fatigue damage prediction as a part of technical systems reliability assessment. Key Eng Mater 755:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leitner B, Figuli L (2017) Fatigue life prediction of mechanical structures under stochastic loading. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 157, 22nd Slovak-Polish Scientific Conference on Machine Modelling and Simulations, MMS 2017Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Military University of TechnologyWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Motor Transport InstitutionWarsawPoland
  3. 3.Technical University, UniversiapolisAgadirMorocco

Personalised recommendations