• David D. Franks
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Sociology book series (BRIEFSSOCY)


Data are presented about the recent growth of neuroscience. Next, I describe why and how the book is addressed to different readers. Reservations that some sociologists have about neuroscience are reviewed and shown to be unfounded. The differences of the halves of the brain separated by the corpus callosum are described along with how this dovetails with important sociological concepts. This is followed by a discussion of the social nature of the brain. If this is true, sociologists should know about it even though it goes against our westernized notion of the self separated from others. The idea of reductionism seen by many as essential to science is challenged and contrasted with mind as an emergence. Important generalizations about the nature of the brain are presented. Following this is a discussion of the history of the term “neurosociology” started in the early 1970s by TenHouten. His top-down treatment, i.e., culture working down to affect the brain, is contrasted with Davis’s cybernetic (top-down/bottom-up) approach. The chapter ends with a discussion of theory and methods in neuroscience and briefly describes the book’s chapters.


Neuroism Accounts Corpus callosum Vocabulary of motives Units of analysis Agency Reductionism Self-consciousness Social control Determinism Reductionism Emergence Linguistic turn Astonishing hypothesis Plasticity Synapses Persistent inequality fMRI TMS Wada test 


  1. Baumeister, R. (1986). Identity: Cultural change and the struggle for self. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brothers, L. (1997). Friday’s footprint: How society shapes the human mind. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Brothers, L. (2001). Mistaken identity: The mind-brain problem reconsidered. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cacioppo, J., & Berntson, G. (1992). Social psychological contributions to the decade of the brain: Doctrine of multilevel analysis. American Psychologist, 47(8), 1019–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cacioppo, J., & Berntson, G. (2002). Social neuroscience: Understanding the pieces fosters understanding the whole and vice versa. American Psychologist, 57(11), 819–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter, R. (1999). Mapping the mind. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cozolino, L. (2006). The neuroscience of human relationships: Attachment and the developing social brain. London: Norton Press.Google Scholar
  8. Crick, F. (1994). The astonishing hypothesis. The scientific search for the soul. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  9. Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam Press.Google Scholar
  10. Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza. Boston: The Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, J. (2013). In D. Franks & J. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of neurosociology. Persistent inequality: A neurosociological perspective (p. 333). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: The Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Edelman, G. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Edelman, G. (2004). Wider than the sky: The phenomenal gift of consciousness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Elias, N. (1982). In H. Martins & R. Whitley (Eds.), Scientific establishments and hierarchies (Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  16. Franks, D. (2010). Neurosociology: The nexus between neuroscience and social psychology. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Franks, D., & Heffernan, S. (1998). The pursuit of happiness: Contributions from the social psychology of emotions. In W. Flack & J. D. Laird (Eds.), Emotions in psychopathology: Theory and research (p. 145). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Franks, D., & Smith, T. (2005). Mind, “brain and society: Toward a neurosociology of emotion”. In Social perspectives on emotion. (Vol. 5). Stanford: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gazzaniga, M. (1985). The social brain. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  20. Gazzaniga, M. (2006). Human: The science behind what makes us unique (1st ed.). New York: Ecco.Google Scholar
  21. Geertz, C. (Ed.). (1974). Myth, symbol and culture. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  22. Gibbs, R. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Iacoboni, M. (2008). Mirroring people: The new science of how we connect with others. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
  24. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  25. LeDoux, J. (1996). The emotional brain. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  26. LeDoux, J. (2003). The synaptic self. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  27. Lyng, S., & Franks, D. (2002). Sociology and the real world. Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  28. Markova, I. (2003). Constitution of the self: Intersubjectivity and dialogicality. Culture and Psychology, 9, 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Massey, D. (2002). “A brief history of human society: The origin and role of emotion in social life:” 2001 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 67(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self & society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: The University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
  31. Murphy, R., et al. (2003). Functional neuroanatomy of emotions. Journal of Cognitive Affective Behavioral Neurosciences, 9(3), 207–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramachandran, V. S. (2011). The Tell-Tale Brain: A neuroscientists’ quest for what makes us human. New York: W Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  33. Sampson, E. (1981, July). Cognitive psychology as ideology. American Psychologist., 36(7), 730–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sampson, E. (1988). The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning. American Psychologist, 43(1), 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scheff, T. (1990). Microsociology: Discourse, emotion, and social structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Schwartz, J., & Begley, S. (2002). The mind and the brain: Neuroplasticity and the power of mental force. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  37. Scott, M., & Lyman, S. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 31, 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shibutani, T. (1961). Society and personality: An interactionist approach to social psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sperry, R. W. (1965). Mind, brain and humanist values. In J. R. Platt (Ed.), New man views of the nature of man (p. 71). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. TenHouten, W., & Kaplan, C. (1973). Science and its mirror image: A theory of inquiry. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Tuan, Y. (1982). Segmented worlds and self: Group life and individual consciousness. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wentworth, W. M., & Yardley, D. (1994). Deep sociality: A bioevolutionary perspective on the sociology of human emotions. In W. M. Wentworth & J. Ryan (Eds.), Social perspectives on emotion. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  43. Westen, D. (1985). Self and society: Narcissism, collectivism, and the development of morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • David D. Franks
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations