Advertisement

Toward a Foundation: The Ex Mechanicis Proof of the Law of Chords

  • Jochen Büttner
Chapter
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science book series (BSPS, volume 335)

Abstract

In a letter to Guidobaldo del Monte written in November 1602, Galileo mentioned having found a proof for the so-called law of chords, i.e. the statement that fall along any chord inscribed in the same circle and sharing either its apex or nadir is completed in equal time. The proof alluded to in the letter is identified with one of the proofs Galileo provided for this proposition in the Discorsi. It is set apart from all other proofs regarding naturally accelerated motion contained in the Discorsi in that it makes a dynamical argument. This chapter reconstructs and discusses in great detail the sequence of steps by which in 1602 Galileo initially established the dynamical argument forming the basis of this proof. Contrary to the widely accepted opinion that Galileo constructed this argument while still holding the assumption characteristic of his older De Motu Antiquiora that motion along inclined planes is in principle uniform, it is thus shown that the argument was constructed only after he had come to accept that falling motion was naturally accelerated. It is, moreover, demonstrated that Galileo was already aware of the law of chords when he first constructed a dynamical argument in support of it. The new proof could be considered to rest on fundamental principles and Galileo indeed earmarked it as being intended to replace a proof of the same proposition he had constructed earlier. The way in which Galileo may have come to accept the law of chords as a heuristic in the first place is discussed.

References

  1. Büttner, J. (2009). Wie auf Erden, so im Himmel: Zwei Welten – eine Physik. Sterne und Weltraum, 4: 52–62.Google Scholar
  2. Büttner, J., Renn, J., Damerow, P., & Schemmel, M. (2003). The challenging images of artillery: Practical knowledge at the roots of the scientific revolution. In W. Lefèvre, J. Renn, & U. Schoepflin (Eds.), The power of images in early modern science (pp. 3–28). Basel: Birkhäuser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Damerow, P., Renn, J., & Rieger, S. (2001). Hunting the white elephant: When and how did Galileo discover the law of fall? In J. Renn (Ed.), Galileo in context (pp. 29–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Damerow, P., Freudenthal, G., McLaughlin, P., & Renn, J. (2004). Exploring the limits of preclassical mechanics. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Descartes, R. (2001). Discourse on method, optics, geometry and meteorology (Reprint ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Drake, S. (1978). Galileo at work: His scientific biography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Galilei, G., Crew, H., & Salvio, A.D. (1954). Dialogues concerning two new sciences. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Galluzzi, P. (1979). Momento. Rome: Ateneo e Bizzarri.Google Scholar
  9. Giusti, E. (2004). A master and his pupils: Theories of motion in the Galilean school. In C.R. Palmerino & J.M.M.H. Thijssen (Eds.), The reception of the Galilean science of motion in seventeenth-century Europe (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 239, pp. 119–135). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  10. Hooper, W.E. (1992). Galileo and the problems of motion. Dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  11. Hooper, W. (1998). Inertial problems in Galileo’s preinertial framework. In P. Machamer (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Galileo. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Humphreys, W. (1967). Galileo, falling bodies and inclined planes: an attempt at reconstructing Galileo’s discovery of the law of squares. British Journal for the History of Science, 3(11), 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Laird, W.R. (2001). Renaissance mechanics and the new science of motion. In J. Montesinos & C. Solís (Eds.), Largo campo di filosofare: Eurosymposium Galileo 2001 (pp. 255–267). La Orotava: Fundación Canaria Orotava de Historia de la Ciencia.Google Scholar
  14. Mersenne, M. (1963). Harmonie universelle, contenant la théorie et la pratique de la musique. Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique.Google Scholar
  15. Naylor, R.H. (1974). Galileo and the problem of free fall. The British Journal for the History of Science, 7(2), 105–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Naylor, R.H. (2003). Galileo, Copernicanism and the origins of the new science of motion. The British Journal for the History of Science, 36(2), 151–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Settle, T. (1966). Galilean science: Essays in the mechanics and dynamics of the Discorsi. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  18. Souffrin, P. (1990). Galilée et la tradition cinématique pré-classique. La proportionnalité momentum-velocitas revisitée. Cahier du Séminaire d’Epistémologie et d’Histoire des Sciences, 22, 89–104.Google Scholar
  19. Souffrin, P. (2001). Proceedings of the XXth international congress of history of science: (Liège, 20–26 July 1997) Bd. 08: Medieval and classical traditions and the Renaissance of physico-mathematical sciences in the 16th century. In P.D. Napolitani & P. Souffrin (Eds.), De diversis artibus (Vol. 50, p. 149). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  20. Souffrin, P., & Gautero, J.L. (1992). Note sur la démonstration ‘mécanique’ du théorème de l’isochronisme des cordes du cercle dans les ‘Discorsi’ de Galilée. Revue d’histoire des sciences et de leurs applications, 45, 269–280.Google Scholar
  21. Torricelli, E. (1919). De motu gravium naturaliter descendentium, et projectorum. In G. Loria & G. Vassura (Eds.), Opera di Evangelista Torricelli (Vol. 2). Faenza: Montanari.Google Scholar
  22. Wisan, W.L. (1974). The new science of motion: A study of Galileo’s De motu locali. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 13, 103–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jochen Büttner
    • 1
  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for the History of ScienceBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations