By 2050, a Possible Strengthening of the Regional Dependence on Agricultural Imports

  • Agneta ForslundEmail author
  • Chantal Le Mouël
  • Stéphane Manceron
  • Elodie Marajo-Petitzon
  • Bertrand Schmitt


As we highlighted in the previous chapter, the large increase in agricultural imports in the Middle East-North Africa region between 1961 and 2011 is the result of a combination of several factors. A population explosion has combined with dietary changes and has led to a strong growth in demand for food and feed. Growth in regional agricultural production, although significant, could not meet this demand, in particular because of insufficient improvements in yields, and the limited availability of cultivable land and access to water for irrigation. The extension of these past trends for each component of the regional agricultural and food system, which we will now examine in terms of the effects on the balance between food needs and agricultural resources in 2050, is likely to result in a strengthening of the dependence on imports.


  1. Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J (2012) World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. ESA Working paperGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanc P, Abis S (2015) Egypte. Entre insecurites alimentaires et inconnues geopolitiques. Demeter 2015:193–249Google Scholar
  3. Bouwman AF, Van der Hoek KW, Eickhout B, Soenario I (2005) Exploring changes in world ruminant production systems. Agric Syst 84:121–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brunelle T (2014) Climate change as a driver of land uses, Working paper for the Agrimonde-Terra Foresight, 37 pGoogle Scholar
  5. CIHEAM (2007) Tensions méditerranéennes sur les ressources en eau. In: Watch Letter n°1 – avril 2007. Montpellier, CIHEAM, 8 pGoogle Scholar
  6. Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Meisner C, Wheeler D, Yan J (2007) The impact of Sea Level Rise on developing countries: a comparative analysis, World Bank policy research working paper, n°4136, 51 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dumas P (2014) GlobAgri: disagregation and reaggregation of livestock data. Working paper for the Agrimonde-Terra foresight, 8 pGoogle Scholar
  8. FAO (2012) Country Programming Framework (CPF) Government of Egypt 2012–2017., February 2012Google Scholar
  9. Fisher G, Nachtergaele FO, Prieler S, Teixeira E, Tóth G, van Velthuizen H Verelst L, Wiberg D (2012) Global Agro‐Ecological Zones (GAEZ v3.0): model documentation. IIASA and FAO, Laxenburg, Austria and Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  10. Hare WL, Cramer W, Schaeffer M, Battaglini A, Jaeger CC (2011) Climate hotspots: key vulnerable regions, climate change and limits to warming. Reg Environ Chang 11(Suppl 1):S159–S166Google Scholar
  11. Herrero M, Havlik P, Valin H, Notenbaret A, Rufino MC, Thornton PK, Blümmel M, Weiss F, Grace D, Obersteiner M (2013) Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. PNAS 110(52):20888–20893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, 1535 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Müller C, Robertson RD (2014) Projecting future crop productivity for global economic modeling. Agric Econ 45:37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mutin G (2006) Quel avenir hydraulique pour l’Egypte ? Confluences Méditerranées 3(58):115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Niang I, Ruppel OC, Abdrado MA, Essel A, Lennard C, Padgham J, Urquhart P (2014) 2014 Africa. In: Barros VR, Field CB, Dokken DJ, Mastrandea MD, Mach KJ, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandea PR, White LL (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: Regional aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, pp 1199–1265Google Scholar
  16. UNO (2013) World population prospects: the 2012 revision, key findings and advance tables. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division, New-York, 50 pGoogle Scholar
  17. Zabel F, Putzenlechner B, Mauser W (2014) Global agricultural land resources: a high resolution suitability evaluation and its perspectives until 2100 under climate change conditions. Plos One 9(9):e107522CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Éditions Quæ 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Agneta Forslund
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chantal Le Mouël
    • 2
  • Stéphane Manceron
    • 3
  • Elodie Marajo-Petitzon
    • 2
  • Bertrand Schmitt
    • 3
  1. 1.UAR Département SAE2INRARennesFrance
  3. 3.DEPEINRAParisFrance

Personalised recommendations