Advertisement

The Policy of Non-Alignment

  • W. F. Van Eekelen

Abstract

In the past fifteen years the primary concern of newly independent nations was the assertion of a national identity after their previous colonial existence and foreign policy became the main instrument for expressing their new dignity. The postwar international situation provided an opportunity to gain a position of influence which exceeded the realities of economic and military power. But diplomatic action was strongly conditioned by the domestic scene.1 International relations were spread as widely as possible since partiality towards any group of nations, and particularly towards the former colonial powers, would have carried the risk of losing control over the nationalist movement. As both camps in the cold war gradually accepted the existence of non-aligned nations and were prepared to aid them economically a neutralist position acquired considerable attraction for countries in need of substantial assistance.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    See: Scalapino, A., Neutralism in Asia.Google Scholar
  2. 1.
    cf. Morgenthau, H. J., Neutrality and Neutralism; G. Schwarzenberger, The scope of neutralism.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    Foreign policy resolution of Jaipur Session, Dec, 1948. See also p. 21, note 1.Google Scholar
  4. 1.
    Nehru, J., India today and tomorrow, Indian Council for Cultural Relations 1959. See also “The Basic Approach,” A.I.C.C. Economic Review, No. 201–202 (Aug. 15, 1958).Google Scholar
  5. 2.
    Basham, A. L., The Wonder that was India, Grove Press, New York, 1954, p. 123. The movement of Indian nationalism coincided with a Hindu reformation largely based on the Bhagavad Gita, the conversation between Arjuna and Krishna on the eve of battle. Although intended as a defence of the established order in which everyone should fulfil his class function to the best of his ability, its message of action, directed to ordinary people, lent itself to a revolutionary interpretation. Its conception of the ideal man stressed the person of equable mind acting without personal desire or attachment and directing his efforts towards the welfare of the world. The Gita also foresaw the inevitable decay of all institutions and the necessity of change to restore the harmony of life.Google Scholar
  6. 3.
    Fisher, L., Gandhi, p. 38–39.Google Scholar
  7. 1.
    Nehru, J., The discovery of India, p. 97. Ahimsa is the Indian term for non-violence.Google Scholar
  8. 2.
    Lok Sabha Debates, Dec. 6, 1950. The Lok Sabha is the House of the People in the Indian Parliament, the Rajya Sabha the House of States.Google Scholar
  9. 3.
    Fisher, L., op. cit., p. 69.Google Scholar
  10. 4.
    The Times, June 18, 1962.Google Scholar
  11. 1.
    E.g. Suri, Surindar, “Economics,” Seminar, No. 19, p. 31–34.Google Scholar
  12. 2.
    Levi, W., The evolution of India’s foreign policy. T.B.W.A. (1958), p. 117.Google Scholar
  13. 3.
    Mansergh, N., Survey of British Commonwealth Affairs, p. 357.Google Scholar
  14. 4.
    Bajpai, G. S., “Ethical stand on world issues,” The Hindu, Jan. 26, 1950.Google Scholar
  15. 5.
    Address to Indian Council of World Affairs, April 5, 1960.Google Scholar
  16. 6.
    Kundra, J. C., Indian Foreign Policy 1947–1954, p. 89–90.Google Scholar
  17. 7.
    Lok Sabha Secretariat, Military Alliances 1947–57, p. 14.Google Scholar
  18. 1.
    Tanya Zinkin, “Indian foreign policy,” World Politics VII (1955) 179; Nehru in U.S. Congress Oct. 13, 1949; Nehru’s speeches 1949–53, p. 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 2.
    Speeches of Dec. 4, 1947, March 22, 1949 and July 7, 1950 quoted in Gupta, K., India’s Foreign Policy, p. 15 and 20 and Kundra, op. cit., p. 55.Google Scholar
  20. 3.
    The Economist, May 12, 1956, p. 587.Google Scholar
  21. 1.
    Brecher, M., Nehru, a political biography, p. 559.Google Scholar
  22. 2.
    Rusett, A. de, “On understanding India’s foreign policy”; with reply by A. Appadorai. International Relations, I (1959) 229–261 and II (1960) 69–79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. F. Van Eekelen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations