Advertisement

Toward a Chronology Standard for Project CRER

  • Erle G. Kauffman
Chapter
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (ASIC, volume 304)

Abstract

To develop global-scale historical records of the Cretaceous requires reliable and refined systems of chronology and correlation. To produce the needed systems, Coordinating Committee 1 proposes a two-phase program. The short-term objective is to provide an initial chronological standard that will combine revisions of the existing chronologies with new data of all kinds: biostratigraphic, magnetostratigraphic, radiometric, and event stratigraphic. The longer-term objective is to construct a high-resolution chronology that is capable of dating to less than 100 Kyr. Cyclostratigraphy (de Boer and Fischer, this volume) and graphic correlation are promising new avenues to achieve the needed high-resolution. In addition, the use of lineage evolution can increase the resolution of biostratigraphy and sequence and event stratigraphy can also make significant contributions to a refined chronology.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Birkelund, T., Hancock, J.M. Hart, M.B., Rawson, P.F., Remane, J., Robaszynski, F., Schmid, F., and Surlyk, F., 1984, Cretaceous stage boundaries - proposals. Bull, Geol. Soc. Denmark, 33, 1–20.Google Scholar
  2. Edwards, L.E., 1984, Insights on why graphic correlation (Shaw’s method) works. Jour. Geol., 92, 583–597.Google Scholar
  3. Edwards, L.E., 1989, Supplemented graphic correlation: A powerful tool for palentologists and nonpaleontologists. Palaios, 4, 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hart, M.B., 1987, Micropaleontology of Carbonate Environments, Halsted Press, 296 p.Google Scholar
  5. Haq, B.V., Hardenbol, J., and Vail P.R., 1987, Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic. Science, 235, 1156–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harland, W.B., 1982, A geologic time scale. Cambridge, England, and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp 1–131.Google Scholar
  7. Hazel, J.E., 1989 (in press)Google Scholar
  8. Kauffman, E.G., 1970, Population systematics, radiometrics, and zonation–A new biostratigraphy. Proc.,N. American Paleont. Cony. I, pt. F, 612–666.Google Scholar
  9. Kauffman, E.G., 1988, Concepts and methods of high-resolution event stratigraphy. Ann. Rev. Earth, Planet. Sci., 16, 605–654.Google Scholar
  10. Miller, F.X. 1977, The graphic correlation method in biostratigraphy. In Kauffman, E.G., and Hazel J.E. (eds.), Concepts and methods of biostratigraphy; Stoudsburg, PA, Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross Pub., 187–212.Google Scholar
  11. Shaw, A.B. 1964. Time Stratigraphy. McGraw-Hill Co. New York, 365 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erle G. Kauffman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geological SciencesUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations