Advertisement

Paleogeographic Maps, a Status Report

  • William W. Hay
  • Christopher N. Wold
  • Christopher A. Shaw
  • Kevin M. Wilson
Chapter
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (ASIC, volume 304)

Abstract

The factors which most critically affect paleogeographic maps are: 1) the spatial resolution of the data base; 2) the map projection; 3) the initial fits and rotations of the major continental blocks; 4) the number of plates rotated independently for the reconstruction; 5) the number of terranes shown; 6) palinspastic reconstruction of continental margins and interiors, and palinspastic reconstruction of terranes; and 7) the reference frame. Because refinements arecontinually being made as new data becomes available and incorporated into the reconstructions, it is impossible to set specific rules to be followed. Most importantly, text accompanying the reconstructions should describe the factors listed above. The basis for paleogeographic features, such as the shoreline, topography and paleobathymetry should also be explicitly stated. The sea level position used to plot the shoreline, whether at maximum transgression, some intermediate or average position, or at regression, should be clearly stated.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews, J. A. (1985): True polar wander: an analysis of Cenozoic and Mesozoic paleomagnetic poles. - Jour. Geophys. Res., 90, 7737–7750.Google Scholar
  2. Auboin, J., Le Pichon, X., u. Monin, A.S. (editors) (1986)@ Evolution of the Tethys. Tectonophysics, 123, 1–315, 10 pls.Google Scholar
  3. Barron, E. J., (1987): Cretaceous plate tectonic reconstructions. Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology, 59, 3–29.Google Scholar
  4. Barron, E.J., Harrison, C.G.A., Sloan, J.L.,II, u. Hay, W.W. (1981): Paleogeography, 180 million years ago to the present.–Eclogae Geol. Helv., 74, 443–470.Google Scholar
  5. Briden, J.C., Drewry, G.E. u. Smith, A.G. (1974): Phanerozoic Equal-Area World Maps. Jour. Geol., 82, 555–574.Google Scholar
  6. Bullard, E., Everett, J., u. Smith, A. (1965): The fit of the continents around the Atlantic. - Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., London, (A), 258, 41–51.Google Scholar
  7. Dietz, R.S. u. Holden, J.C. (1970): Reconstruction of Pangaea: breakup and dispersion of continents, Permian to Present. - Jour. Geophys. Res., 75, 4939–4956.Google Scholar
  8. Firstbrook, P.L., Funnell, B.M., Hurley, A.M. u. Smith, A.G. (1979): Paleoceanic Reconstructions, 160–0 Ma. La Jolla, Deep Sea Drilling Project, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 1–39.Google Scholar
  9. Harrison, C.G.A., and Lindh, T., (1982): A polar wandering curve for North America during the Mesozoic and Cenozoic. - Jour. Geophys. Res., 87B, 903–1920.Google Scholar
  10. Hay, W.W. (1984): The breakup of Pangaea; Climatic, erosional, and sedimentological effects. Proceedings 27th International Geological Congress, Moscow, 6 (Geology of Ocean Basins), 15–38.Google Scholar
  11. Hay, W.W., Shaw, C.A., u. Wold, C.N. (in press): Mass-balanced paleogeographic reconstructions. - Geologische Rundschau.Google Scholar
  12. Klitgord, K.D., and Schouten, H. (1987): Plate kinematics of the central Atlantic. -in Vogt, P.R., and Tucholke, B.E., editors, Western North Atlantic Region, in The Geology of North America, vol. M, Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, 351–378.Google Scholar
  13. McElhinney, M. (1973): Paleomagnetism and Plate Tectonics. - Cambridge University Press, London, 358 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Morgan, W.J. (1981): Hotspot tracks and the opening of the Atlantic and Indian Oceans.–in Emiliani, C. (editor), The Sea, v. 7, The Oceanic Lithosphere, John Wiley u. Sons, New York, 443–487.Google Scholar
  15. Pindell, J.L. (1985): Alleghenian reconstruction and subsequent evolution of the Gulf of Mexico, Bahamas, and proto-Caribbean. Tectonics, 4, 1–39.Google Scholar
  16. Pindell, J.L., and Dewey, J.F. (1982): Permo-Triassic reconstruction of western Pangaea and the evolution of the Gulf of Mexico/Caribbean region.–Tectonics, 1, 179–211.Google Scholar
  17. Pitman, W.C., and Talwani, M. (1972): Sea-floor spreading in the North Atlantic. - Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 83, 619–646.Google Scholar
  18. Sengor, A.M.C. (1987): Tectonics of the Tethysides: Orogenic collage development in a collisional setting. - Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 15, 213–244.Google Scholar
  19. Shaw, C.A. (1987): Balanced Paleogeographic Reconstructions of the Northwestern Gulf of Mexico Margin and its Western-central North American Source Area Since 65 Ma. - M.S. Thesis, University of Colorado, 285 p.; also available as an U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Report.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, A.G. u. Briden, J.C. (1977): Mesozoic and Cenozoic Paleocontinental Maps. - Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 63 p.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, A.G., Briden, J.C., u. Drewry, G.E. (1973): Phanerozoic World Maps. In: Hughes, N.F. (editor), Paleont. Assoc., Special Papers in Paleontology, 12, 1–42.Google Scholar
  22. Snyder, J.P. (1982): Map projections used by the U.S. Geological Survey.–U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 1532, 1–313.Google Scholar
  23. Sprinsky, W.H., and Snyder, J.P. (1986): The Miller Oblated Stereographic projection for Africa, Europe, Asia and Australia. - American Cartographer, 13, 253–261.Google Scholar
  24. Vinogradov, A.P. (1967): Atlas of the Lithological Paleogeographical Maps of the USSR, 4, Paleogene, Neogene and Quaternary. - Moscow, Ministry of Geology of the USSR, 55 sheets.Google Scholar
  25. Vinogradov, A.P. (1968a): Atlas of the Lithological Paleogeographical Maps of the USSR, 1, Precambrian, Cambrian, Ordovician and Silurian Periods. Moscow, Ministry of Geology of the USSR, 52 sheets.Google Scholar
  26. Vinogradov, A.P. (1968b): Atlas of the Lithological Paleogeographical Maps of the USSR, 3, Triassic, Jurassic, and Cretaceous. - Moscow, Ministry of Geology of the USSR, 71 sheets.Google Scholar
  27. Vinogradov, A.P. (1969): Atlas of the Lithological Paleogeographical Maps of the USSR, 2, Devonian, Carboniferous and Permian. Moscow, Ministry of Geology of the USSR, 65 sheets.Google Scholar
  28. Wilson, K.M., (1987): Circum-Pacific suspect terranes and lost microcontinents: chips off the old blocks.–Proc. Pacific Rim Congr. 87, Aus. I. M. M., 927–930.Google Scholar
  29. Wilson, K.M., Rosol, M.J., u. Hay, W.W. (in press): Global Mesozoic reconstructions using revised continental data and terrane histories: a progress report. In: Hillhouse, J.W. (editor), Deep Structure and Past Kinematics of Accreted Terranes, Amer. Geophys. Union, Geodynamics Series.Google Scholar
  30. Ziegler, A.M., Scotese, C.R., u. Barrett, S.F. (1982): Mesozoic and Cenozoic paleogeographic maps. In: Brosche, P., and Sunderman, J. (editors), Tidal Friction and the Earth’s Rotation, New York, Springer Verlag, 240–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • William W. Hay
    • 2
    • 1
  • Christopher N. Wold
    • 3
    • 1
  • Christopher A. Shaw
    • 4
    • 1
  • Kevin M. Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.Museum, Department of Geology Research in Environmental SciencesUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Institut für Palaeontologie und historische GeologieLudwig-Maximillians UniversitätMünchen 2BRD
  3. 3.Institute für Allgemeine und Angewandte GeophysikLudwig-Maxmillians UniversitätMünchenBRD
  4. 4.U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Sedimentary ProcessesDenver Federal CenterDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations