Advertisement

Correlation between the Electrical Properties and Morphological Characteristics in the Smooth Muscle Cells during Culture

  • T. Maruyama
Chapter

Abstract

Electrophysiological properties of smooth muscle cells have been extensively studied in various smooth muscle tissues. These distinct membrane properties of smooth muscle cells are based on the studies of organic tissues. Studies on the electrical properties of the smooth muscle cells from intact tissues raise certain problems because of the neural elements within the tissues, and because of the low electrical coupling between the smooth muscle cells. Furthermore, the presence of diffusion barriers and the intercellular current make it impossible to measure accurately the electrical properties of a single smooth muscle cell. To overcome such problems, researchers have described electrophysiological measurements on the cultured smooth muscle cell in vitro (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). We re-investigated the cultured smooth muscle cells from guinea-pig taenia coli to elucidate the electrical properties of cultured smooth muscle cells.

Keywords

Smooth Muscle Cell Gastrointestinal Motility Smooth Muscle Tissue Spontaneous Action Potential Spontaneous Electrical Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Purves, R.D., Mark, G.E. and Burnstock, G. (1973). The electrical activity of single isolated smooth muscle cells. Pliigers Arch. ges. Physiol., 341, 325–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Purves, R.D. (1974). Muscarinic excitation: a microelectrophoretic study on cultured smooth muscle cells. Br. J. Pharmac., 52, 77–86.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mclean, M.J. and Speralakis, N.S. (1976). Electrophysiological recording from spontaneously contracting reaggregates of cultured vascular smooth muscle cells from chick embryos. Expl. Cell Res., 104, 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kimes, B.W. and Brandt, B.L. (1976). Characterization of two putative smooth muscle cell lines from rat thoracic aorta. Expl. Cell Res., 98, 336–347.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sinback, C.N. and Shain, W. (1979). Electrophysiological properties of human oviduct smooth muscle cells in dissociated cell culture. J. Cell Physiol., 98, 377–394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Campbell, G, R., Chamley, J. H. and Burnstock, G. (1974). Development of smooth muscle cells in tissue culture. J. Anat., 117, 295–312.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chamley, J. H., Campbell, G. R. and Burnstock, G. (1974). Dedifferentiation, redifferentiation and bundle formation of smooth muscle cells in tissue culture: the influence of cell number and nerve fibers. J. Embryol. exp. Morph., 32, 297–323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chamley-Campbell, J., Campbell, G. R. and Ross, R. (1979). The smooth muscle cell in culture. Physiol. Rev. 59, 1–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Campbell, R. G., Uehara, Y., Mark, G. and Burnstock, G. (1971). Fine structure of smooth muscle cells grown in tissue culture. J. Cell Biol., 49, 21–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ross, R. (1971). The smooth muscle cell. II Growth of smooth muscle in culture and formation of elastic fibers. J. Cell Biol., 50, 172–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tornita, T. (1966). Membrane capacity and resistance in mammalian smooth muscle. J. theor. Biol., 12, 216–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burnstock, G., Holman, M. E. and Prosser, C. L. (1963). Electrophysiology of smooth muscle. Physiol. Rev., 43. 482–527.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bülbring, E. (1954). Membrane potentials of smooth muscle fibres of the taenia coli of the guinea-pig. J. Physiol., 125, 302–315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bülbring, E. and Kuriyama, H. (1963). Effect of changes in ionic environment on the action of ACh and adrenaline on smooth muscle cells of the guinea-pig taenia coli. J. Physiol., 166, 59–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    BUlbring, E. and Kuriyama, H. (1963). Effect of changes in the external sodium and calcium concentration on spontaneous electrical activity in smooth muscle of guinea-pig taenia coli. J. Physiol., 166, 29–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tornita, T. (1981). Electrical activity (spikes and slow waves) in gastrointestinal smooth muscles. In: Bülbring, E., Brading, A. F., Jones, A. W. and Tornita, T. Ed. Smooth muscle: an assessment of current knowledge. pp. 127–156. (london: Edward Arnold)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MTP Press Limited 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Maruyama

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations