Advertisement

Intestinal Transit time is Related with Different Anorectal Motility Patterns in Chronic Non-Organic Constipation

  • G. A. Lanfranchi
  • G. Bazzocchi
  • M. Campieri
  • C. Brignola
  • F. Fois
  • L. Marzio
  • G. Labò

Abstract

Constipation is a symptom common to many and different dis eases. It is due, at any rate, to an altered transit of intestinal contents, but it can be a secondary symptom in an organic intestinal and extraintestinal disease, or it can be caused by a primary motor disorder of the bowel. Also in this latter case constipation may be either the main or the only symptom, or it may belong to the wide range of the irritable bowel syndrome. On the other hand, even the definition of constipation is controversial: constipation may be defined as a reduced frequency of evacuations, as a difficulty in stools expulsion or as expulsion of too small stools. For all these reasons, the patients suffering from constipation do not make a homogeneous group. The studies aiming at investigating the intestinal motor alterations responsible for constipation, should consider this problem and should therefore be carried out for cases selected according to clear nosological criteria.

Keywords

Irritable Bowel Syndrome Transit Time Gastrointestinal Motility Internal Anal Sphincter Intestinal Transit Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Corazziari, E. et al. (1982). Italian Cooperative Study on Chronic Constipation. In: Wienbeck, M. (ed). Motility of the digestive tract. pp. 52. 3–526 ( New York: Raven Press )Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Devroede, G. (1978). Constipation: mechanisms and manage ment. In: Sleisinger, N.H. and Fordtran, J.S. (eds). Castro intestinal Disease. pp. 368–383. ( Philadelphia–Londo-n–Toronto. WB Saunders Company ).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Preston, D.M. and Lennard Jones, J.E. (1982). Does fail ure of bisacodyl-induced colonic peristalsis indicate in trinsic nerve damage? Gut, 23, A 891.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arhan,P. et al. (1981). Segmental colonic transit time. Dis. Col. e Rect., 24, 625–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lanfranchi, G.A. et al. (1983). Motor function and dysfun ctions of the large bowel and the rectum. Colo-proct., 1, 19–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MTP Press Limited 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. A. Lanfranchi
  • G. Bazzocchi
  • M. Campieri
  • C. Brignola
  • F. Fois
  • L. Marzio
  • G. Labò

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations