Advertisement

Development of indwelling sensors for continuous electrolyte monitoring

  • Robert C. Eberhart
  • Gabor Szabo
  • Timothy S. Thomasson
  • Mark S. Munro
Chapter
Part of the Developments in Critical Care Medicine and Anaesthesiology book series (DCCA, volume 1)

Abstract

Continuous measurement of ionic activity with inexpensive, reliable, and robust instrumentation poses a continuing challenge in intensive care medicine. Conventional ion-sensing glass electrodes are bulky, fragile, and expensive. In general they require off-line use. Despite their inherent problems, they are used widely in many industries including medicine.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Janata J, Huber RJ: Ion sensitive field effect transistors. Ion Sel Electrode Rev 1: 31–79, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cheung PW, Fleming DG, Ko WH, Neuman MR: Theory, design and biomedical applications of solid state chemical sensors. West Palm Beach FL: CRC Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Esashi M, Matsuo T: Integrated micro multi-ion sensor using field effect of semiconductor. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 25: 184–192, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McKinley BA, Wong KC, Janata J, Westenskow D, Jordan WS: In vivo continuous monitoring of ionized calcium in dogs using ion sensitive field effect transistors. Crit Care Med 9:333– 339, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McKinley BA, Houtchens BA, Janata J: Continuous monitoring of interstitial fluid potassium during hemorrhagic shock in dogs. Crit Care Med 9: 845–851, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Siu WM, Cobbold RSC: Basic properties of the electrolyte-SiO-Si system: physical and theoretical aspects. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 26: 1805 - 1815, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zemel JN: Ion sensitive field effect transistors and related devices. Anal Chem 47: 255a, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Griffiths GH, Moody GJ, Thomas JDR: An investigation of the optimum composition of PVC matrix membranes used for ion selective electrodes. Analyst 97: 420, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abe H, Esashi M, Matsuo T: ISFETs using inorganic gate thin films. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 26: 1939–1944, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moss SD, Johnson CC, Janata J: Hydrogen, calcium and potassium ion-sensitive FET transducers: a preliminary report. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 25: 49–54, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koryta J: Ion selective electrodes. Cambridge Monogr Phys Chem no. 2, 1975.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ross JW: Calcium selective electrode with liquid ion exchanger. Science 156: 1378–1379, 1967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hill JL, Gettes LS, Lynch MR, Hebert NC: Flexible valinomycin electrodes for on-line determination of intravascular and myocardial K+. Am J Physiol 235: H455–H459, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Edbon L, Ellis AT, Corfield GC: Ion sensitive polymeric membrane electrodes with immobilized ion exchange sites. I. Development of a calcium electrode. Analyst 104: 730–738, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Munro MS, Quattrone AJ, Ellsworth SR, Kulkarni P, Eberhart RC: Alkylsubstituted polymers with enhanced albumin affinity. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 27: 499–503, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eberhart RC, Lynch ME, Bilge FH, Wissinger JF, Munro MS, Ellsworth SR, Quattrone AJ: Protein adsorption on polymers: visualization, study of fluid shear and roughness effects and methods to enhance albumin binding. Adv Chem Ser 199 (in press, 1982).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grinnell F, Feld MK: Adsorption characteristics of plasma fibronectin in relationship to biological activity. J Biomed Mater Res 15:363–382, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Inhlenfeld JV, Mathis TR, Mosher DF, Cooper SL, etal: Transient in vivo thrombus deposition onto polymeric bio- materials: role of plasma fibronectin. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 24: 727–735, 1978.Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    Mori Y, Nagaoka S, Masubuchi Y, Itoga M, Tanzawa H, et al: The effect of released heparin from the heparinized hydrophilic polymer (HRSD) on the process of thrombus formation. Trans Am Soc Intern Organs 24: 736–745, 1978.Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    Ebert C, McRea JC, Kim SW: Controlled release of antithrombotic agents from polymer matrices. In: Baker R (ed) Controlled release of bioactive agents. New York: Academic Press, 1980, pp 107 - 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 20.
    Cheung PW: Chemical sensors. In: Gravenstein JS, Newbower RS, Ream AK, Smith NT (eds) Essential noninvasive monitoring in anesthesia. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1980.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert C. Eberhart
  • Gabor Szabo
  • Timothy S. Thomasson
  • Mark S. Munro

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations